Purpose: To evaluate the functional and morphological outcomes of patients with SO tamponade due to primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (primRD) and recurrent rhegmatogenous detachment (recRD). Methods: Seventy-five eyes were enrolled in this prospective study between January 2009 and December 2016. Patients with primRD and recRD were evaluated in a complete ophthalmic examination including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT before and after silicone oil removal (SOR). Results: The primRD group comprised 35 eyes and the recRD group 40 eyes with a duration of SO tamponade of 9 ± 4/12 ± 11 months in the primRD/recRD groups (p = .088). The preoperative OCT revealed a high rate of morphological changes such as ERM (primRD: 24%; recRD: 69%) and CME (primRD: 10%; recRD: 55%) in the recRD compared with the primRD group (ERM: p = .18; CME: p = .04). No such difference was observed postoperatively. Disruption of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) was similar in both groups (primRD: 52%; recRD: 72%) before SOR and was restored in 66%/58% (primRD/recRD) after SOR. No difference was found regarding pre- and postoperative VA (0.91 ± 0.54/0.90 ± 0.54logMAR primRD/recRD preoperative; 0.76 ± 0.56/0.71 ± 0.53logMAR primRD/recRD at the last follow-up; p = .96/p = .70). EZ integrity (0.43 ± 0.31logMAR) was associated with better functional results than an interrupted EZ (0.86 ± 0.43logMAR; p < .001). A significant positive correlation of the duration of SO tamponade and the final VA was found in the primRD (r = 0.396, p = .02) whereas none in the recRD group (r = 0.196; p = .31). Conclusion: Morphological changes including ERM and CME were more pronounced in the recRD group, but only before SOR. Interestingly, the pre- and postoperative BCVA were similar in both groups with EZ integrity being a factor of good functional outcome. The duration of SO tamponade had a statistically significant negative impact on the postoperative VA in the primary detachments.
Purpose: To evaluate the functional and morphological outcomes of patients with SO tamponade due to primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (primRD) and recurrent rhegmatogenous detachment (recRD). Methods: Seventy-five eyes were enrolled in this prospective study between January 2009 and December 2016. Patients with primRD and recRD were evaluated in a complete ophthalmic examination including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT before and after silicone oil removal (SOR). Results: The primRD group comprised 35 eyes and the recRD group 40 eyes with a duration of SO tamponade of 9 ± 4/12 ± 11 months in the primRD/recRD groups (p = .088). The preoperative OCT revealed a high rate of morphological changes such as ERM (primRD: 24%; recRD: 69%) and CME (primRD: 10%; recRD: 55%) in the recRD compared with the primRD group (ERM: p = .18; CME: p = .04). No such difference was observed postoperatively. Disruption of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) was similar in both groups (primRD: 52%; recRD: 72%) before SOR and was restored in 66%/58% (primRD/recRD) after SOR. No difference was found regarding pre- and postoperative VA (0.91 ± 0.54/0.90 ± 0.54logMAR primRD/recRD preoperative; 0.76 ± 0.56/0.71 ± 0.53logMAR primRD/recRD at the last follow-up; p = .96/p = .70). EZ integrity (0.43 ± 0.31logMAR) was associated with better functional results than an interrupted EZ (0.86 ± 0.43logMAR; p < .001). A significant positive correlation of the duration of SO tamponade and the final VA was found in the primRD (r = 0.396, p = .02) whereas none in the recRD group (r = 0.196; p = .31). Conclusion: Morphological changes including ERM and CME were more pronounced in the recRD group, but only before SOR. Interestingly, the pre- and postoperative BCVA were similar in both groups with EZ integrity being a factor of good functional outcome. The duration of SO tamponade had a statistically significant negative impact on the postoperative VA in the primary detachments.
Authors: Tisileli S Tuifua; Joseph R Abraham; Sunil K Srivastava; Peter K Kaiser; Jamie Reese; Justis P Ehlers Journal: Retina Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Mariantonia Ferrara; Giulia Coco; Tania Sorrentino; Kirti M Jasani; George Moussa; Francesco Morescalchi; Felipe Dhawahir-Scala; Francesco Semeraro; David H W Steel; Vito Romano; Mario R Romano Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 4.964