Literature DB >> 31478063

Improvement in tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life and psychological comorbidities by cochlear implantation in single-sided deaf patients.

S M Häußler1, S Knopke2, S Dudka2, S Gräbel2, M C Ketterer3, R-D Battmer4, A Ernst4, H Olze2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) lack the ability localize sound sources and have difficulty with speech-in-noise hearing. In addition, there is a high prevalence of tinnitus distress. These problems may result in reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological comorbidities. This study aimed to investigate the influence of treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) on HRQoL, tinnitus distress, psychological comorbidities, and audiological parameters in SSD patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 20 patients with postlingually acquired SSD (13 women, 7 men, mean age 57.0 years). Data on HRQoL were collected with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 Survey (SF-36). Tinnitus distress was assessed with the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), psychological comorbidities were evaluated with validated questionnaires, and speech perception and hearing ability were measured with validated speech tests.
RESULTS: Postoperatively, the mean total NCIQ score (p < 0.0001) and four subscores improved significantly, as did tinnitus distress (p < 0.05). Anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire, GAD-7) decreased significantly after CI. Speech perception improved significantly, particularly "hearing with background noise" (p < 0.05, Oldenburg Inventory, OI) and "localization" (p < 0.001, OI), as well as the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OlSa) scores for with vs. without CI when speech was presented from the SSD side and noise was presented from the normal hearing side (SSSDNNH; p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: CI in SSD patients is a powerful procedure to improve HRQoL, reduce tinnitus distress, and improve psychological comorbidities. Additionally, it is beneficial for hearing improvement, particularly in noise and for directional hearing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Cochlear implant; Correction of hearing impairment; Speech perception; Unilateral hearing loss

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31478063     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-0705-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  35 in total

1.  An initial experience of cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness after prior osseointegrated hearing device.

Authors:  Isaac D Erbele; Joshua G W Bernstein; Gerald I Schuchman; Douglas S Brungart; Arnaldo Rivera
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Bone-anchored hearing aids are effective and associated with a high degree of satisfaction.

Authors:  Ida Sofie Kristina Gardell; Kathrine Andresen; Christian Emil Faber; Jens Højberg Wanscher
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.240

3.  Etiology of single-sided deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Usami; Ryosuke Kitoh; Hideaki Moteki; Shin-Ya Nishio; Tomohiro Kitano; Masafumi Kobayashi; Jun Shinagawa; Yoh Yokota; Kenjiro Sugiyama; Kizuki Watanabe
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  [Audiological results with cochlear implants for single-sided deafness].

Authors:  R Jacob; Y Stelzig; P Nopp; P Schleich
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples.

Authors:  Herbert Fliege; Matthias Rose; Petra Arck; Otto B Walter; Rueya-Daniela Kocalevent; Cora Weber; Burghard F Klapp
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Cochlear implantation for unilateral deafness with and without tinnitus: a case series.

Authors:  Dayse Távora-Vieira; Roberta Marino; Jay Krishnaswamy; Jafri Kuthbutheen; Gunesh P Rajan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Tinnitus distress, anxiety, depression, and hearing problems among cochlear implant patients with tinnitus.

Authors:  Gerhard Andersson; Anders Freijd; David M Baguley; Esma Idrizbegovic
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Cochlear Implantation of Bilaterally Deafened Patients with Tinnitus Induces Sustained Decrease of Tinnitus-Related Distress.

Authors:  Steffen Knopke; Agnieszka J Szczepek; Sophia Marie Häussler; Stefan Gräbel; Heidi Olze
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neural activity of the auditory cortex predicts speech recognition of patients with asymmetric hearing loss after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Iva Speck; Susan Arndt; Johannes Thurow; Alexander Rau; Antje Aschendorff; Philipp T Meyer; Lars Frings; Ganna Blazhenets
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  [Validity and reliability of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in German].

Authors:  Michaela Plath; Matthias Sand; Philipp S van de Weyer; Kilian Baierl; Mark Praetorius; Peter K Plinkert; Ingo Baumann; Karim Zaoui
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 1.330

3.  Surgical management for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Daniele Starnoni; Lorenzo Giammattei; Giulia Cossu; Michael J Link; Pierre-Hugues Roche; Ari G Chacko; Kenji Ohata; Majid Samii; Ashish Suri; Michael Bruneau; Jan F Cornelius; Luigi Cavallo; Torstein R Meling; Sebastien Froelich; Marcos Tatagiba; Albert Sufianov; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Idoya Zazpe; Moncef Berhouma; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Jeroen B Verheul; Constantin Tuleasca; Mercy George; Marc Levivier; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy Thomas Daniel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Is the cochlear implant a successful long-term solution for single-sided deaf and asymmetric hearing-impaired patients?

Authors:  Iva Speck; Pascal Challier; Thomas Wesarg; Till Fabian Jakob; Antje Aschendorff; Frederike Hassepass; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Lateralization Pattern of the Weber Tuning Fork Test in Longstanding Unilateral Profound Hearing Loss: Implications for Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Mohamed Bassiouni; Sophia Marie Häußler; Stefan Gräbel; Agnieszka J Szczepek; Heidi Olze
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 6.  Short- and Long-Term Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Disabling Tinnitus in Single-Sided Deafness Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samar A Idriss; Pierre Reynard; Mathieu Marx; Albane Mainguy; Charles-Alexandre Joly; Eugen Constant Ionescu; Kelly K S Assouly; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Prospective study on health-related quality of life in patients before and after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Michaela Plath; Theresa Marienfeld; Matthias Sand; Philipp S van de Weyer; Mark Praetorius; Peter K Plinkert; Ingo Baumann; Karim Zaoui
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.