| Literature DB >> 31478001 |
Katarzyna Lisiecka1, Agnieszka Wójtowicz1, Dariusz Dziki1, Urszula Gawlik-Dziki2.
Abstract
Modern nutritional trends and looking for functional food and dedicated products for various consumers are a source of inspiration for scientists to develop new pro-health supplemented foods with high quality. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the selected properties of common wheat pasta fortified with dried Cistus incanus in amount from 1 to 5% as a replacement of wheat flour. Pasta was made with a spaghetti shape and dried. Supplemented pasta was tested for total phenolics content, the total activity against DPPH, the ability to neutralize free radicals to ABTS and the antioxidant capacity reduction power, using various extraction procedures. Selected physicochemical properties of pasta were evaluated: cooking time, cooking weight, cooking loss, hardness and color profile of dry and cooked pasta in CIE-Lab scale, as well as the sensory properties of supplemented products. The addition of C. incanus to fortify wheat pasta increased total phenolics content and antioxidant activity with some significant differences according to the extraction procedure used. Methanolic extraction was more efficient than buffer extraction. Increased addition of dry Cistus herb caused higher cooking weight, cooking loss and increased hardness of cooked pasta. Studies have shown that C. incanus addition had a slight effect on color change with the largest decrease in brightness, especially for cooked products. Finally, it was found that advisable application of C. incanus addition to achieve nutritionally improved composition of pasta should not exceed 3% due to the proper sensory characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Cistus incanus; Cooking quality; Extraction method; Pasta
Year: 2019 PMID: 31478001 PMCID: PMC6706516 DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03900-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0022-1155 Impact factor: 2.701
The content of polyphenols (mg GAE/g d.w.) in methanol extract (ME) and buffer extract (BE) of dry pasta depend on Cistus incanus participation
| Addition of | TPC in ME (mg GAE/g) | TPC in BE (mg GAE/g) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.64 ± 0.26c | 8.71 ± 0.61d |
| 1 | 8.45 ± 0.68ac | 11.04 ± 0.02a |
| 2 | 10.34 ± 0.22ab | 12.52 ± 0.28a |
| 3 | 11.13 ± 0.07ab | 15.73 ± 0.28b |
| 4 | 12.89 ± 0.85bd | 17.15 ± 0.33bc |
| 5 | 15.27 ± 0.59d | 18.28 ± 0.13c |
n = 3; mean ± SD
TPC total phenolic content, ME methanol extract, PBSE phosphate buffered saline extract
a–dMeans followed by the same letter within a column indicate no significant difference (p < 0.05) in Tukey test
Correlation matrix of selected properties of pasta supplemented with C. incanus
Significance level 0.05
ns not significant, AA additive amount of C. incanus, TPC total phenolic content, ME methanol extract, PBSE phosphate buffered saline extract, DPPH antiradical activity, ABTS antiradical activity, FRAP ferric reducing power, CWI cooking weight index, OCT optimum cooking time, CL cooking loss, H hardness, DP dry pasta, CP cooked pasta, L* brightness, a* redness–greenness balance, b* yellowness–blueness balance, App appearance, Col color, Aro aroma, Tas taste, Tex texture
Fig. 1Antioxidant activity of compounds contained in methanol extracts (ME) and phosphate buffered saline extracts (PBSE) of dry wheat pasta depend on Cistus incanus participation tested with DPPH, ABTS and FRAP method
Results of cooking characteristics and texture of dry and cooked wheat pasta depend on Cistus incanus participation
| Addition of C | CWI (−) | OCT (min) | CL (%) | Hardness (N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry pasta | Cooked pasta | ||||
| 0 | 3.29 ± 0.01b | 12.5 ± 0.5a | 5.7 ± 0.002b | 4.68 ± 2.89a | 0.26 ± 0.04a |
| 1 | 4.36 ± 0.13a | 12.0 ± 0.5a | 6.8 ± 0.001ab | 4.81 ± 1.15a | 0.29 ± 0.04ab |
| 2 | 4.12 ± 0.11a | 14.5 ± 0.5a | 6.7 ± 0.001ab | 5.00 ± 1.69a | 0.38 ± 0.10ab |
| 3 | 4.33 ± 0.04a | 14.5 ± 0.5a | 8.1 ± 0.003a | 5.16 ± 1.92a | 0.34 ± 0.07ab |
| 4 | 4.19 ± 0.13a | 12.0 ± 0.1a | 7.8 ± 0.001a | 4.33 ± 1.62a | 0.36 ± 0.12ab |
| 5 | 4.56 ± 0.09a | 12.0 ± .01a | 9.8 ± 0.005c | 2.79 ± 1.16b | 0.41 ± 0.08ab |
n = 3; mean ± SD
CWI cooking weight index, OCT optimum cooking time, CL cooking loss
a–cMeans followed by the same letter within a column indicate no significant difference (p < 0.05) in Tukey test
Mean values of color coordinates L*, a* and b* of pasta depend on Cistus incanus participation
| Addition of | Dry pasta | Cooked pasta | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 | 74.58 ± 2.79c | 2.54 ± 0.82a | 10.52 ± 0.34d | 52.22 ± 5.45c | 1.08 ± 0.97b | 6.66 ± 0.35c |
| 1 | 69.24 ± 1.47bc | 3.33 ± 0.46a | 14.83 ± 0.48a | 46.08 ± 2.01b | 4.38 ± 0.71a | 11.90 ± 1.52a |
| 2 | 68.45 ± 1.67abc | 3.60 ± 0.20ab | 15.32 ± 1.16ab | 44.00 ± 1.84ab | 3.40 ± 1.09a | 12.84 ± 1.01ab |
| 3 | 68.12 ± 1.33abc | 4.00 ± 1.27ab | 16.05 ± 0.21abc | 44.75 ± 2.90ab | 4.08 ± 0.89a | 13.88 ± 1.72ab |
| 4 | 62.12 ± 4.33ab | 3.76 ± 0.56ab | 16.68 ± 0.63bc | 43.36 ± 0.70ab | 4.75 ± 0.21a | 14.43 ± 0.29ab |
| 5 | 61.06 ± 5.03a | 5.12 ± 0.45b | 17.66 ± 1.14c | 40.02 ± 3.27a | 5.24 ± 1.52a | 14.95 ± 1.13b |
n = 5; mean ± SD
L* brightness, a* redness(+)–greenness(−) balance, b* yellowness(+)–blueness(−) balance
a–dMeans followed by the same letter within a column indicate no significant difference (p < 0.05) in Tukey test
Results of acceptability of dry and cooked wheat pasta supplemented with addition of dried Cistus incanus leaves
| Addition of | Dry pasta | Cooked pasta | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Color | Aroma | Overall acceptability | Appearance | Color | Aroma | Taste | Texture | Overall acceptability | |
| 0 | 8.00 ± 0.63b | 7.40 ± 0.49b | 7.24 ± 0.48b | 7.55 | 6.67 ± 0.82ab | 5.71 ± 0.98a | 7.04 ± 0.63a | 7.07 ± 0.85ab | 7.67 ± 0.67b | 6.83 |
| 1 | 8.07 ± 0.68b | 7.20 ± 0.75b | 7.13 ± 0.72b | 7.47 | 7.91 ± 0.75b | 7.28 ± 0.65b | 6.37 ± 0.90a | 7.44 ± 0.91b | 8.28 ± 0.78b | 7.46 |
| 2 | 7.93 ± 0.57b | 7.11 ± 0.92b | 7.04 ± 0.92b | 7.36 | 7.44 ± 0.72b | 6.67 ± 1.03ab | 6.13 ± 1.22a | 7.00 ± 0.92ab | 7.55 ± 0.88b | 6.96 |
| 3 | 6.27 ± 0.85ab | 4.24 ± 0.97a | 5.13 ± 0.98a | 5.21 | 5.33 ± 0.87ab | 5.71 ± 0.93a | 6.22 ± 1.01a | 6.53 ± 1.05ab | 7.27 ± 1.16b | 6.21 |
| 4 | 4.40 ± 0.95a | 4.09 ± 0.89a | 5.02 ± 1.13a | 4.50 | 5.29 ± 0.96ab | 5.53 ± 1.11a | 6.15 ± 1.89b | 6.40 ± 1.20ab | 6.33 ± 1.21b | 5.94 |
| 5 | 4.07 ± 0.85a | 3.95 ± 0.84a | 4.88 ± 0.79a | 4.30 | 2.95 ± 0.87a | 5.06 ± 0.83a | 5.58 ± 0.61a | 5.53 ± 0.91a | 3.31 ± 1.13a | 4.48 |
a–dMeans followed by the same letter within a column indicate no significant difference (p < 0.05) in Tukey test