Literature DB >> 31477940

Outcome of Respiratory Distress in Neonates with Bubble CPAP at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital.

Sunil Raja Manandhar1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory distress is one of the commonest problem seen in neonates during admission in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Hyaline Membrane disease, Meconium Aspiration Syndrome, septicemia, congenital pneumonia, Transient Tachypnea of Newborn are the major causes of respiratory distress in neonates. Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure is a non-invasive respiratory support delivered to a spontaneously breathing newborn to maintain lung volume during expiration. The main objective of this study was to observe the outcome of respiratory distress in neonates with Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.
METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital over six months (October 2018 - March 2019) period. All preterm, term and post term babies with respiratory distress were included. Ethical clearance was received from Institutional Review Committee of Kathmandu Medical College and statistical analysis was done with SPSS 19 version.
RESULTS: Sixty three babies with respiratory distress were included in this study with 45 (71%) male predominance. The mean birth weight receiving Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure was 2661.75±84 gms and gestational age was 36.67±3.4 wks. The Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure was started at 8.05±2 hr of life and duration of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure required for settling respiratory distress was 95.71±3 hrs. Out of 63 babies, improvement of respiratory distress in neonates with Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure was 39 (61%) with confidence interval of 38% to 62% whereas 24 (39%) babies required mechanical ventilation and other modalities.
CONCLUSIONS: This study concludes usefulness of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in neonates with respiratory distress.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bubble CPAP; neonates; respiratory distress.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31477940      PMCID: PMC8827587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc        ISSN: 0028-2715            Impact factor:   0.406


INTRODUCTION

Respiratory distress is one of the most common problem occurring; 5% in term and 29% in preterm babies requiring admission in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) leading to 20% of neonatal deaths.[1-3] Saeed Z et al. described respiratory distress as the most common presenting problem encountered within the first 48–72 hours of life with a prevalence of 4.24% in neonates.[4] Hyaline Membrane Disease (HMD), Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS), septicemia, congenital pneumonia, Transient Tachypnea of Newborn (TTN) are the major causes of respiratory distress in preterm, term and post term neonates.[5] Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is an effective therapy for managing respiratory distress in preterm, term and post term neonates.[6] CPAP is the application of positive pressure (4–6 cm of water) to the airways of spontaneously breathing babies throughout the respiratory cycle to reduce work of breathing, preventing lung collapse by maintaining functional residual capacity.[7-10] The main objective of this study was to observe the outcome of respiratory distress in neonates with Bubble CPAP (B-CPAP).

METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study done at 10 bedded NICU of Pediatrics Department, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (KMCTH), Sinamangal, Kathmandu. Perinatal Mortality Rate (PMR) of this tertiary hospital is 10/1000 births and Neonatal mortality rate (NMR) is 4.5 /1000 live births.[11] Ethical clearance was received from Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of Kathmandu Medical College and written consent was taken from parents after explaining the baby's condition requiring B-CPAP therapy. B-CPAP is a non-invasive ventilation to deliver CPAP in a spontaneously breathing newborn to maintain lung volumes during expiration.[12] The study period was of six months (October 2018 to March 2019) duration. All preterm, term and post term babies born at KMCTH with respiratory distress due to any cause eg. Hyaline membrane disease (HMD), Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS), septicemia, congenital pneumonia, Transient Tachypnea of Newborn (TTN) and perinatal asphyxia were included in this study. Syndromic babies and lethal congenital anomalies (eg. meningomyelocel, anencephaly, gastroschisis and diaphragmatic hernia) were excluded. Sample size estimation: where, s= calculated sample size for infinite population n= sample size Z=1.96 for Confidence Interval of 95% p= prevalence of improvement of respiratory distress in neonates with B-CPAP, 50% q = 1- p N= definite population (70) d = margin of error considering 6% as a non-response rate, Total sample size was 63. Sixty three neonates were included in this study and convenient sampling method was applied. Respiratory distress was documented by fast breathing (Respiratory rate > 60/min) and followed by any one of the followings.[13] Low O2 saturation (SPO2 < 87%) Chest retraction Grunting Nasal flaring Severe chest indrawing. Severity of respiratory distress in neonates is assessed by Silverman's Anderson Respiratory Scoring. Silver-man's score 0 indicates no respiratory distress, 4–6 indicates moderate respiratory distress and 7–10 indicates severe respiratory distress. Silverman score > 4 were eligible for keeping babies under B-CPAP.[14] Details of birth history, type of delivery along with maternal variables eg. multiple births, Pregnancy Induced Hypertension, Prolonged Rupture of Membrane (PROM) were recorded. Babies variables eg. birth weight, ges-tational age, Apgar score at 1minute and 5 minute, delivery room management (oxygen, tactile stimulation, bag and mask ventilation and intubation), silverman's scoring before and after starting B-CPAP were also recorded. Following parameters were observed during the study period: time of starting B-CPAP, respiratory rate before, during and after B-CPAP, total duration required to wean off B-CPAP, any case of B-CPAP failure requiring mechanical ventilation. The other clinical data recorded are Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA), Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) and Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) (clinical and Echo proven), pneumothorax, culture positive sepsis, duration of hospital stay among the survivors. In this study, more term and normal birth weight babies could be studied, which could improve the outcome of B-CPAP. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 19 version.

RESULTS

There were total of 63 babies with respiratory distress included in this study. The mean birth weight of babies receiving B-CPAP was 2661.75±84 gms and mean gestational age was 36.67±3.4 weeks. Similarly, mean Silverman's score before starting B-CPAP was 5.03±1.13 and mean age of starting B-CPAP due to grunting and chest retraction was 8.05±26.03 hr of life. Total mean duration of B-CPAP required to settle respiratory distress in neonates with respiratory distress was 95.71±36.7 hrs. Mean duration of babies kept under mechanical ventilation was 15.06±42.1 hrs and mean hospital stay among the survivor neonates was 8±3.37 days (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographics and clinical parameters of babies under B-CPAP (n = 63).

S.N.VariablesMeanRange
1Gestational Age36.67±3.4(28–41) wks.
2Birth weight2661.75±84(800 −4500) gms
3Silverman's score before starting Bubble CPAP5.03±1.13(4–8)
4Mean age of Bubble CPAP started8.05±26.03(1–192 ) hrs
5Apgar Score at 1 min6.54±1.70(3–8)
6.Apgar Score at 5 min7.89±1.30(4–9)
7Mothers Age27.19±3.6(19–38 ) yrs.
8Mean duration of Maternal PROM (15 mothers)37±24.2(18–96) hrs
9SPO2 in room air84.73±2.16(80–88) %
10Total duration of Bubble CPAP required95.71±36.7(24–192) hrs
11Total duration of Mechanical Ventilation required due to B-CPAP failure (12 babies)15.06±42.1(0–240)hrs
12Total Hospital Stay (59 babies)8±3.37(3–15 )days
Forty five (71%) babies were term with male predominance 47 (75%). Out of 63 babies, 38 (60%) babies were of normal birth weight, regarding neonatal resuscitation, 42 (67%) babies did not require any form of resuscitation and only 4 (8%) babies required extensive neonatal resuscitation. The most common disease for starting B-CPAP was congenital pneumonia 15 (23%) followed by MAS 12 (19%) and Birth Asphyxia 8 (13%). There were 7 (11%) babies each had HMD and neonatal sepsis. Six babies (10%) were diagnosed as congenital acyanotic heart disease by Echo, out of which four had isolated ASD, one had ASD with VSD and one had ASD with PDA. During the study period, a total of 24 (39%) babies required additional treatment apart from B-CPAP. Twelve (19%) babies required mechanical ventilation due to B-CPAP failure and 4 (8%) babies with HMD required Surfactant Replacement Therapy (SRT). Similarly 6 (10%) babies received Frusemide for Echo proven severe pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), 1 (2%) baby was treated with water seal drainage for right sided Pneumothorax and 1 (2%) baby required sodium bicarbonate correction for severe metabolic acidosis with neonatal sepsis. Out of 63 babies, 59 (94%) babies were survived and only 4 (6%) babies were expired. Prevalance of improved respiratory distress with B-CPAP was 39 (61%) at 95% confidence interval [38%-62%]. Three babies died due to septicemia with DIC and one baby died due to pulmonary hemorrhage. The commonest complication of B-CPAP seen in 10 (16%) neonates was superficial skin abrasion under the nose and over the cheeks. Four (6%) babies each had gastric distension and acquired secondary infection whereas 1 (2%) each had right sided pneumothorax and recurrent apnea respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Neonatal Characteristics (n = 63).

S.N.Variablesn
1.Baby sex
Male47(75)
Female16(25)
Total63(100)
2.Gestation
Preterm18(29)
Term45(71)
Total63(100)
3.Birth weight
Extremely low birth weight (<1kg)2(3)
Very low birth weight (<1.5 kg)8(13)
Low birth weight (<2.5 kg)15(24)
Normal birth weight (2.5–4 kg)38(60)
Total63(100)
4.Resuscitation procedure done at birth
Not required42(67)
Tactile stimulation5(7)
Bag n Mask12(19)
Bag n Mask and Chest Compression1(2)
Bag n Mask, Chest Compression and Intubation2(3)
Bag n Mask, Chest Compression, Intubation and drug1 (2)
Total63 (100)
5.Mode of delivery
Emergency cesarean section41(65)
Elective cesarean section9(14)
Normal delivery13(21)
Total63(100)
6Causes of Respiratory Distress requiring Bubble CPAP
6.1Congenital Pneumonia
o Maternal history of PROM9(14)
o Maternal High Vaginal Swab (HVS) culture positive3(5)
o Other3(5)
Total15(23)
6.2Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS)12(19)
6.3Birth Asphyxia
○ HIE stage I2(3)
○ HIE stage II6(10)
Total8(13)
6.4Hyaline Membrane Disease (HMD)
○ Grade II2(3)
○ Grade III2(3)
○ Grade IV3(5)
Total7(11)
6.5Congenital Acyanotic Heart Disease
○ Atrial Septal Defect (ASD)4(6)
○ ASD with Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD)1(2)
○ ASD with PDA (Patent Ductus Arterious)1(2)
Total6(10)
6.6Neonatal Sepsis
○ Culture positive sepsis4(6)
○ Culture negative sepsis3(5
Total7(11)
6.7Transient Tachypnea of Newborn (TTN)6(10)
6.8Aspiration Pneumonia2(3)
Total63(100)
7Additional treatment required
Respiratory support by B-CPAP only39(61)
Mechanical ventilation for B-CPAP failure12(19)
Frusemide for severe Pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH)6(10)
Surfactant Replacement Therapy (SRT) for HMD4(6)
Water seal drainage for Pneumothorax1(2)
Sodium bicarbonate correction for severe metabolic acidosis with neonatal sepsis1(2)
Total63(100)
8Outcome of babies under Bubble CPAP
Survived59(94)
Expired4(6)
Total63(100)
9Cause of death
Pulmonary hemorrhage1(2)
Septicemia with DIC3(5)
Total4(6)
10Complication of Bubble CPAP
No complication43(68)
Superficial skin abrasion10(16)
Secondary infection4(6)
Gastric distension4(6)
Right sided Pneumothorax1(2)
Recurrent Apnea1(2)
Total63(100)
The study highlighted that mean duration of B-CPAP use within 24 hrs was 94.47±36.9 hrs and after 24 hrs was 128±13.8 hrs (Table 3).
Table 3

Time of starting B-CPAP with respect to its duration and time to wean.

Age of starting B-CPAPDuration of B-CPAP requiredTime required to wean off from B-CPAP
MeanRangeMeanRangeMeanRange
B-CPAP started within 24 hrs (n= 59)2.83±2.6(1–12) hrs94.47±36.9(24–192)hrs4.28±2.02(2–12)days
B-CPAP started after 24 hrs (n= 4)85±73.7(26–192)hrs128 ±13.8(120–144)hrs6.75±2.8(3–10)days
Before B-CPAP, the mean respiratory rate was 83.02±7/ min, which had decreased after 48–96 hrs of B-CPAP. Similarly, the initial PEEP required before B-CPAP was 5.63±0.6cm of water, which was decreased after 48–96 hrs of B-CPAP. It showed decreasing trend of respiratory rate and PEEP pressure requirement after the use of B-CPAP (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

This descriptive cross-sectional study included all newborns (preterm and term) with respiratory distress who were treated with B-CPAP as the primary respiratory support. The included newborns were mostly term (71%) and 60% babies were of normal weight (2.5–4 kg). The controversy of early vs delayed CPAP continues to have many trials favoring early CPAP were carried out to be better in the larger infants prior to routine use of antenatal steroids and postnatal surfactant.[15] The evidence suggested exogenous surfactant use with early CPAP with brief ventilation in extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW) babies had decreased the use of mechanical ventilation.[16] Similarly, this study also showed B-CPAP within 24 hrs (early CPAP) in neonates with respiratory distress was effective in reducing respiratory effort and required lesser duration (94.47±36.9 hrs) of B-CPAP as compared to after 24 hrs (128±13.8 hrs). This finding was also strongly supported by the study done by Mathai SS et al, in which B-CPAP use within 24 hrs had less duration of B-CPAP (44.93±24.56 hrs) required as compared to after 24 hrs (85.57±54.16 hrs).[17] This study described the commonest cause of respiratory distress requiring B-CPAP was congenital pneumonia (23%) followed by MAS (19%), birth asphyxia (13%) and HMD (11%). Mathur NB et al. postulated congenital pneumonia as the main cause of respiratory distress (68%) with maternal history of PROM >24 hrs as one of the risk factor for it.[18] This study also corroborated similar findings as out of 15 babies with congenital pneumonia, nine babies had maternal history of PROM highlighting it as one of the major risk factor. Lanieta et al successfully demonstrated the usefulness of B-CPAP in developing countries highlighting its cost effectiveness.[19] Similarly in this study, out of 63 babies with B-CPAP 39 (61%) babies were improved. Since, this is a single institutional study with convenient sampling, outcome might not be generalized. There are chances of selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes usefulness of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in neonates with respiratory distress.
Table 4

Clinical parameters under B-CPAP.

Respiratory RatePEEP requirement
MeanRangeMeanRange
Before B-CPAP83.02 ± 7.4 (n= 63)(68–110)/min5.63±0.6 (n=63)(4–7) cm of water
At 48 hrs of B-CPAP73.23 ± 9.3 (n= 61)(50–90) /min4.98 ±0.7 (n= 61)(4–7) cm of water
At 72 hrs of B-CPAP63.75 ±9.8 (n= 53)(46–86) /min4.87 ±0.7 (n= 53)(4–7) cm of water
At 96 hrs of B-CPAP59.91 ±9.9 (n= 35)(42–80) /min4.51 ±0.7 (n= 35)(4–7) cm of water
  14 in total

Review 1.  Complications in the transition from fetal to neonatal life.

Authors:  Debbie Fraser Askin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2002 May-Jun

2.  An evaluation of bubble-CPAP in a neonatal unit in a developing country: effective respiratory support that can be applied by nurses.

Authors:  Lanieta Koyamaibole; Joseph Kado; Josaia D Qovu; Samantha Colquhoun; Trevor Duke
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.165

Review 3.  Nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress in non-tertiary care centres: what is needed and where to from here?

Authors:  Adam Buckmaster
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.954

Review 4.  Respiratory distress in the newborn.

Authors:  Suzanne Reuter; Chuanpit Moser; Michelle Baack
Journal:  Pediatr Rev       Date:  2014-10

5.  Respiratory morbidity in late preterm births.

Authors:  Judith U Hibbard; Isabelle Wilkins; Liping Sun; Kimberly Gregory; Shoshana Haberman; Matthew Hoffman; Michelle A Kominiarek; Uma Reddy; Jennifer Bailit; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Victor Hugo Gonzalez Quintero; Christos G Hatjis; Helain Landy; Mildred Ramirez; Paul VanVeldhuisen; James Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Early versus delayed initiation of continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.

Authors:  J J Ho; D J Henderson-Smart; P G Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

7.  Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  H Verder; P Albertsen; F Ebbesen; G Greisen; B Robertson; A Bertelsen; L Agertoft; B Djernes; E Nathan; J Reinholdt
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Respiratory distress in neonates with special reference to pneumonia.

Authors:  N B Mathur; K Garg; S Kumar
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.411

Review 9.  Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants.

Authors:  P G Davis; D J Henderson-Smart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

Review 10.  Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates.

Authors:  A G De Paoli; P G Davis; B Faber; C J Morley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  1 in total

1.  Novel predictor markers for early differentiation between transient tachypnea of newborn and respiratory distress syndrome in neonates.

Authors:  Mohamed Shawky Elfarargy; Ghada M Al-Ashmawy; Sally Abu-Risha; Haidy Khattab
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.219

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.