| Literature DB >> 31477781 |
John R Weinstein1,2, Anaité Diaz-Artiga3, Neal Benowitz4, Lisa M Thompson5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Household air pollution from solid fuels is a leading risk factor for morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pregnant women's exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), two components of solid-fuel smoke, is associated with adverse birth outcomes. Even with improved solid-fuel stoves, exposure to PAHs and VOCs remains high. Therefore, cleaner cooking fuels need to be prioritized.Entities:
Keywords: Household air pollution; LPG stoves; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Solid fuel use; Urinary biomarkers; Volatile organic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31477781 PMCID: PMC7044065 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0163-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ISSN: 1559-0631 Impact factor: 5.563
Airborne exposures and the associated urinary metabolite measured by LC-MS/MS.
| Exposure | Metabolite (acronym) | |
|---|---|---|
| Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | Naphthalene | 2-naphthol |
| Fluorene | 1-hydoxyfluorene | |
| 2-hydroxyfluorene | ||
| 3-hydroxyfluorene | ||
| Phenanthrene | 1-hydroxyphenanthrene | |
| 2-hydroxyphenanthrene | ||
| 3,4-hydroxyphenanthrene | ||
| Pyrene | 1-hydroxypyrene | |
| Volatile organic compounds | Benzene | phenylmercapturic acid (PMA) |
| 1,3- butadiene | 4-hydroxy-2-buten-1-yl-mercapturic acid (MHBMA-3) | |
| Ethylene oxide, acrylonitrile, vinyl chloride | 2-hydroxyethylmercapturic acid (HEMA) | |
| Methylating agents | methylmercapturic acid (MMA) | |
| Acrylonitrile | 2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid (CNEMA) | |
| Acrolein | 3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (3HPMA) | |
| Propylene oxide | 2-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (2HPMA) | |
| Acrylamide | 2-carbamoylethylmercapturic acid (AAMA) | |
| Crotonaldehyde | 3-hydroxy-1-methyl-propylmercapturic acid (HPMMA) | |
Urinary concentration of urinary metabolites of PAHs and VOCs.
| 2-naphthol | 231.8 (137.8–351.4) | 142.7 (77.8–289.6) | −38% |
| 1-hydroxyfluorene | 7.3 (3.8–11.0) | 4.7 (2.3–10.0) | −36% |
| 2-hydroxyfluorene | 24.7 (13.3–33.9) | 17.5 (7.6–27.6) | −29% |
| 3-hydroxyfluorene | 7.8 (4.1–12.3) | 5.3 (2.2–10.3) | −32% |
| Σ hydroxyfluorenes | 42.5 (21.3–55.1) | 29.4 (11.7–47.1) | −31% |
| 1-hydroxyphenanthrene | 21.7 (11.51–30.22) | 19.9 (10.73–42.17) | −8% |
| 2-hydroxyphenanthrene | 8.05 (4.4–13.8) | 6.9 (3.6–14.5) | −14% |
| 3,4-hydroxyphenanthrene | 13.2 (8.0–18.5) | 10.2 (4.3–18.1) | −23% |
| Σ hydroxyphenanthrenes | 46.7 (23.8–65.4) | 37.0 (18.3–70.7) | −21% |
| 1-hydroxypyrene | 19.7 (10.6–27.9) | 16.9 (7.2–30.7) | −14% |
| Total PAH | 367.2 (196.8–520.4) | 234.5 (137.0–497.0) | −36% |
| PMA (benzene) | 0.7 (0.3–1.4) | 0.4 (0.2–0.9) | −40% |
| MHBMA-3 (1,3-butadiene) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) | 0% |
| HEMA (ethylene oxide) | 3.4 (2.4–5.0) | 3.0 (1.7–4.0) | −12% |
| MMA (methylating agents) | 30.5 (16.8–55.6) | 23.3 (15.4–43.1) | −24% |
| CNEMA (acrylonitrile) | 5.0 (2.8–11.0) | 3.1 (1.7–7.7) | −37.7% |
| 3HPMA (acrolein) | 264.0 (179.6–398.0) | 266.1 (224.3–387.8) | 1% |
| 2HPMA (propylene oxide) | 19.7 (14.5–24.1) | 19.4 (15.5–25.3) | −1% |
| AAMA (acrylamide) | 75.4 (58.9–98.1) | 81.5 (62.5–120.9) | 8% |
| HPMMA (crotonaldehyde) | 193.3 (130.3–307.7) | 185.8 (155.4–265.4) | −4% |
indicates significant difference between median urinary metabolite concentrations at baseline and follow-up by Wilcoxon sign-rank text (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.005)
Figure 1.Median and inter-quartile range of total PAH urinary metabolite concentration by fuel type, at baseline with wood stove (n=50) and at follow-up with exclusive LPG use (n=11) or mixed wood and LPG stove use (n=37).
* Indicates significant difference between median concentrations at follow-up period between those with exclusive LPG use and mixed wood and LPG stove use at follow-up by Wilcoxon rank sum test (* < 0.05; ** < 0.01; *** < 0.005)
Urinary metabolite concentrations (eα) and proportion (eβ) with fuel, temascal (wood-fired sauna bath) use and season from mixed-effects model on log-transformed data
| Concentration | Provided gas stove | Recent temascal use | Cold season | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-naphthol | 315.2 | 0.60 | 1.66 | 1.38 |
| Σ hydroxyfluorenes | 43.9 | 0.52 | 2.35 | 1.61 |
| Σ hydroxyphenanthrenes | 40.8 | 0.78 | 2.26 | 1.42 |
| 1-hydroxypyrene | 18.1 | 0.77 | 2.13 | 1.31 |
| Total PAH | 417.3 | 0.63 | 1.85 | 1.42 |
| PMA (benzene) | 1.1 | 0.51 | 1.61 | 1.73 |
| MHBMA-3 (1,3-butadiene) | 0.2 | 0.88 | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| HEMA (ethylene oxide) | 4.0 | 0.75 | 1.39 | 1.01 |
| MMA (methylating agents) | 29.2 | 0.80 | 1.86 | 0.80 |
| CNEMA (acrylonitrile) | 8.9 | 0.49 | 1.92 | 1.74 |
| 3HPMA (acrolein) | 305.9 | 0.96 | 1.13 | 1.19 |
| 2HPMA (propylene oxide) | 16.0 | 1.14 | 0.91 | 0.97 |
| AAMA (acrylamide) | 67.5 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 1.37 |
| HPMMA (crotonaldehyde) | 4.9 | 1.17 | 1.24 | 1.00 |
indicates significant α or β in the mixed-effects model (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.005)
Spearman correlation of urinary biomarker concentration with personal exposure to PM2.5 by fuel type and temascal (wood-fired sauna bath) use
| Fuel | Recent temascal use | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomarker | Overall (n=97) | Exclusive wood (n=50) | Provided gas stove (n=47) | Recent (n=31) | No recent (n=65) |
| 2-napthol | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.62 |
| 1-hydoxyfluorene | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.60 |
| 2-hydroxyfluorene | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 0.54 |
| 3-hydroxyfluorene | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.59 |
| Σ hydroxyfluorenes | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.57 |
| 1-hydroxyphenanthrene | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| 2-hydroxyphenanthrene | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.46 |
| 3,4-hydroxyphenanthrene | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.52 |
| Σ hydroxyphenanthrenes | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.41 |
| 1-hydroxypyrene | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.48 |
| Total PAH | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.59 |
| PMA | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.61 |
| MHBMA-3 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.16 |
| HEMA | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.33 |
| MMA | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.14 |
| CNEMA | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.60 |
| 3HPMA | 0.21 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| 2HPMA | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.10 |
| AAMA | 0.12 | 0.44 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.19 |
| HPMMA | 0.07 | −0.11 | 0.26 | 0.19 | −0.03 |
p < 0.05
p < 0.01
p < 0.005
Figure 2.Spearman correlation coefficients of urinary concentrations of PAH and VOC metabolites at baseline and follow-up.
Comparison of reductions in particulate matter and urinary metabolite concentrations among cookstove intervention studies
| Intervention, country: comparison | Concentration[ | % change[ | Method | Sample Collection time | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention/Control | Post-intervention | Difference[ | |||||
| Chimney wood stove, Peru: before (open fire; n=44) and after (n=44) | 133 (med) | 70 (med) | −63 | −47% | gravimetric | 48-hour | Li, 2011 |
| Chimney wood stove, Peru: control (open fire; n=179) and intervention (n=153) | 114.4 (GM) | 92.9 (GM) | −21.5 | −19% | GC-MS | Fasting | Li, 2016 |
| Chimney wood stove, Peru: before (open fire; n=57) and after (n=57) | 132.5 (med) | 69.4 (med) | −63.1 | −48% | GC-MS | Fasting | Li, 2011 |
| Chimney wood stove, Mexico: before (open fire; n=47) and after (n=47) | 110.3 (med) | 74.9 (med) | −35.4 | −32% | GC-MS | Fasting | Riojas-Rodriguez, 2011 |
| Σ | |||||||
| Chimney wood stove, Peru: control (open fire; n=179) and intervention (n=153) | 34.5 (GM) | 33.4 (GM) | −1.2 | −3% | GC-MS | Fasting | Li, 2016 |
| Σ | |||||||
| Chimney wood stove, Peru: control (open fire; n=179) and intervention (n=153) | 21.7 (GM) | 21.0 (GM) | −0.7 | −3% | GC-MS | Fasting | Li, 2016 |
| Chimney wood stove, Peru: control (open fire; n=179) and intervention (n=153) | 11.5 (GM) | 12.2 (GM) | 0.7 | +6% | GC-MS | Fasting | Li, 2016 |
| Chimney wood stove, Peru: before (open fire; n=57) and after (n=57) | 14.7 (med) | 11.5 (med) | −3.2 | −22% | GC-MS | Fasting | Li, 2011 |
| Chimney wood stove, Mexico: before (open fire; n=47) and after (n=47) | 16.1 (med) | 10.9 (med) | −5.2 | −32% | GC-MS | Fasting | Riojas-Rodriguez, 2011 |
| Chimney wood stove, Mexico: before (open fire; n=47) and after (n=47) | 59.2 (mean) | 42.4 (mean) | −16.8 | −28% | HPLC | - | Torres-Dosal, 2008 |
Measures of centrality: GM – geometric mean; med – median.
Difference calculated as the arithmetic difference or percent change between measure of centrality in two comparison groups.
Demographic characteristics of study participants (n=50)
| Age years, mean (range) | 25.4 (18.4–38.8) |
| Education, n (%) | |
| None | 13 (27) |
| Elementary school | 13 (27) |
| Middle school | 7 (14) |
| High school | 16 (33) |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | |
| Indigenous Mam | 42 (86) |
| Spanish-speaking | 3 (6) |
| Both | 4 (8) |
| Smoker in household, n (%) | 7 (14) |
| Kitchen in separate structure, n (%) | 44 (88) |
| Burns garbage in kitchen or around home, n (%) | 33 (66) |
| Primary stove, n (%) | |
| Open fire | 12 (29) |
| Stove without chimney | 3 (6) |
| Stove with chimney | 37 (74) |
| Cooking fuel type, n (%) | |
| Wood only | 7 (14) |
| Wood and crop residue | 22 (44) |
| Wood and plastic | 2 (4) |
| Wood, plastic and crop residue | 19 (38) |
| Weeks between gas stove installation and follow-up, mean (range) | 8.6 (2.6–14.9) |
| 48-hour particulate matter 2.5 (μg/m3), median (IQR) | |
| At baseline (exclusively wood) | 102 (64–211) |
| At follow-up (gas stove) | 45 (26–67) |
| % change (median (IQR)) | −56 (−85, −17) |