Literature DB >> 31477479

STABLE II clinical trial on endovascular treatment of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection with a composite device design.

Joseph V Lombardi1, Thomas G Gleason2, Jean M Panneton3, Benjamin W Starnes4, Michael D Dake5, Stephan Haulon6, Peter J Mossop7, Mary-Margaret Seale8, Qing Zhou8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a composite device design (covered stent graft and bare metal stent) for the treatment of patients with acute, complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) presenting with aortic rupture and/or branch vessel malperfusion.
METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study, 73 patients (65.8% male; mean age, 60.7 years) with acute, complicated TBAD were enrolled between August 2012 and January 2015 to receive treatment with the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System (William Cook Europe, Aps, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) at institutions in the United States and Japan. The primary safety end point was the rate of freedom from major adverse events at 30 days, and the primary effectiveness end point was the rate of survival at 30 days. This article reports primary outcomes at 30 days and follow-up results through 1 year, reflecting study data as of March 2018.
RESULTS: Of 73 patients, 20 presented with aortic rupture (27%) and 57 presented with branch vessel obstruction/compromise (78%), including 4 patients presenting with both conditions. The covered stent graft was used in all patients (median, 1; range, 1-3; 1 stent graft used in 64.4%; 47/73), and the bare metal dissection stent was used in 58 of 73 patients (79.5%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in five patients (6.8%): one procedure related, three unrelated to dissection repair, and one indeterminate. Thirty-day major adverse events included myocardial infarction (1.4%), bowel ischemia (1.4%), renal insufficiency/renal failure requiring dialysis (6.8%), stroke (6.8%), paraplegia or paraparesis (5.5%), and prolonged ventilatory support (13.7%). Nine deaths occurred from 31 to 365 days (only one death related to dissection repair); the Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from all-cause mortality was 80.3% ± 4.7% at 1 year. Within 365 days, 9 of 73 patients (12.3%) underwent 10 secondary interventions; no patients required conversion to open surgery. At the 12-month follow-up, complete or partial thrombosis of the false lumen was seen in 100% of patients (46/46) within the stent graft region and in 97.4% of patients (38/39) within the dissection stent region. Growth (>5 mm) of the maximum transaortic diameter was observed in 14.9% of patients (7/47) in the stent graft region and in 38.5% of patients (15/39) within the dissection stent region at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day and 1-year results from the STABLE II study demonstrated favorable clinical and anatomical outcomes for the treatment of rupture and malperfusion in the setting of acute, complicated TBAD. Five-year follow-up is ongoing.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta; Aortic dissection; Dissection; False lumen; Malperfusion; Type B aortic dissection

Year:  2019        PMID: 31477479     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  7 in total

Review 1.  Narrative review on endovascular techniques for left subclavian artery revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair and risk factors for postoperative stroke.

Authors:  Mario D'Oria; Kevin Mani; Randall DeMartino; Martin Czerny; Konstantinos P Donas; Anders Wanhainen; Sandro Lepidi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

2.  STABILISE; treatment of aortic dissection, a single Centre experience.

Authors:  Goran Mitreski; Damian Flanders; Julian Maingard; Domenic Robinson; Jason Chuen; George Matalanis; Siven Seevanayagam; Hong Kuan Kok; Dinesh Ranatunga; Hamed Asadi; Duncan Mark Brooks
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2022-01-27

3.  Commentary: Beyond distal anastomosis new entry: Distal re-entry tears as well.

Authors:  Thomas M Beaver; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  Clinical Results and Aortic Remodeling After Endovascular Treatment for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection With the "Fabulous" Stent System.

Authors:  Ruihan Wang; Yuanqing Kan; Mou Yang; Hongkun Zhang; Xiaoming Zhang; Xiangchen Dai; Shuiting Zhai; Hejie Hu; Xiwei Zhang; Bing Chen; Jianhua Huang; Xiao Qin; Zhanxiang Xiao; Xinwu Lu; Wei Guo; Yi Si; Weiguo Fu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  Creating an appropriate access for endovascular repair by replacing a dissected femoral artery in aortic dissection.

Authors:  Kimihiro Kobayashi; Tetsuro Uchida; Atsushi Yamashita; Mitsuaki Sadahiro
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

6.  Placement of a Zenith® Dissection Endovascular System in the Descending Thoracic Aorta Can Hamper Further Surgical Aortic Operations.

Authors:  Eijiro Nogami; Yuki Takeuchi; Yuichi Koga; Takahiro Kitsuka; Sojiro Amamoto; Baku Takahashi; Motonori Uchino; Shuichiro Yoshitake; Masanori Takamatsu; Manabu Itoh; Junji Yunoki; Atsuhisa Tanaka; Keiji Kamohara
Journal:  EJVES Vasc Forum       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 7.  Role of Endoluminal Techniques in the Management of Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Konstantinos Spanos; Tilo Kölbel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.740

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.