Literature DB >> 31476621

Cerebral blood volume and apparent diffusion coefficient - Valuable predictors of non-response to bevacizumab treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Lucie Petrova1, Panagiotis Korfiatis2, Ondra Petr3, Daniel H LaChance4, Ian Parney5, Jan C Buckner6, Bradley J Erickson7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. The core of standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM was established in 2005 and includes maximum feasible surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide, with subsequent temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields. Unfortunately, nearly all patients experience a recurrence. Bevacizumab (BV) is a commonly used second-line agent for such recurrences, but it has not been shown to impact overall survival, and short-term response is variable.
METHODS: We collected MRI perfusion and diffusion images from 54 subjects with recurrent GBM treated only with radiation and temozolomide. They were subsequently treated with BV. Using machine learning, we created a model to predict short term response (6 months) and overall survival. We set time thresholds to maximize the separation of responders/survivors versus non-responders/short survivors.
RESULTS: We were able to segregate 21 (68%) of 31 subjects into unlikely to respond categories based on Progression Free Survival at 6 months (PFS6) criteria. Twenty-two (69%) of 32 subjects could similarly be identified as unlikely to survive long using the machine learning algorithm.
CONCLUSION: With the use of machine learning techniques to evaluate imaging features derived from pre- and post-treatment multimodal MRI, it is possible to identify an important fraction of patients who are either highly unlikely to respond, or highly likely to respond. This can be helpful is selecting patients that either should or should not be treated with BV.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Bevacizumab; Cerebral blood volume; Glioblastoma multiforme; Glioma therapy response; Machine learning

Year:  2019        PMID: 31476621     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  6 in total

Review 1.  Radiomics for precision medicine in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Kiran Aftab; Faiqa Binte Aamir; Saad Mallick; Fatima Mubarak; Whitney B Pope; Tom Mikkelsen; Jack P Rock; Syed Ather Enam
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  The relationship between the degree of brain edema regression and changes in cognitive function in patients with recurrent glioma treated with bevacizumab and temozolomide.

Authors:  Xianglian Wang; Di Chen; Jianjian Qiu; Shihong Li; Xiangpeng Zheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-11

3.  Galectin-1 activates carbonic anhydrase IX and modulates glioma metabolism.

Authors:  Maheedhara R Guda; Andrew J Tsung; Swapna Asuthkar; Kiran K Velpula
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 9.685

4.  The role of c-Met and VEGFR2 in glioblastoma resistance to bevacizumab.

Authors:  Bruno Carvalho; José Manuel Lopes; Roberto Silva; Joana Peixoto; Dina Leitão; Paula Soares; Ana Catarina Fernandes; Paulo Linhares; Rui Vaz; Jorge Lima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Imaging-Genomics in Glioblastoma: Combining Molecular and Imaging Signatures.

Authors:  Dongming Liu; Jiu Chen; Xinhua Hu; Kun Yang; Yong Liu; Guanjie Hu; Honglin Ge; Wenbin Zhang; Hongyi Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Immune-Related lncRNA Correlated with Transcription Factors Provide Strong Prognostic Prediction in Gliomas.

Authors:  Yixin Tian; Yi-Quan Ke; Yanxia Ma
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.