Literature DB >> 31475794

Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Scott D Solomon1, John J V McMurray1, Inder S Anand1, Junbo Ge1, Carolyn S P Lam1, Aldo P Maggioni1, Felipe Martinez1, Milton Packer1, Marc A Pfeffer1, Burkert Pieske1, Margaret M Redfield1, Jean L Rouleau1, Dirk J van Veldhuisen1, Faiez Zannad1, Michael R Zile1, Akshay S Desai1, Brian Claggett1, Pardeep S Jhund1, Sergey A Boytsov1, Josep Comin-Colet1, John Cleland1, Hans-Dirk Düngen1, Eva Goncalvesova1, Tzvetana Katova1, Jose F Kerr Saraiva1, Małgorzata Lelonek1, Bela Merkely1, Michele Senni1, Sanjiv J Shah1, Jingmin Zhou1, Adel R Rizkala1, Jianjian Gong1, Victor C Shi1, Martin P Lefkowitz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril-valsartan led to a reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The effect of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is unclear.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 4822 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure, ejection fraction of 45% or higher, elevated level of natriuretic peptides, and structural heart disease to receive sacubitril-valsartan (target dose, 97 mg of sacubitril with 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or valsartan (target dose, 160 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was a composite of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. Primary outcome components, secondary outcomes (including NYHA class change, worsening renal function, and change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ] clinical summary score [scale, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations]), and safety were also assessed.
RESULTS: There were 894 primary events in 526 patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 1009 primary events in 557 patients in the valsartan group (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.01; P = 0.06). The incidence of death from cardiovascular causes was 8.5% in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 8.9% in the valsartan group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.16); there were 690 and 797 total hospitalizations for heart failure, respectively (rate ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00). NYHA class improved in 15.0% of the patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 12.6% of those in the valsartan group (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.86); renal function worsened in 1.4% and 2.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.77). The mean change in the KCCQ clinical summary score at 8 months was 1.0 point (95% CI, 0.0 to 2.1) higher in the sacubitril-valsartan group. Patients in the sacubitril-valsartan group had a higher incidence of hypotension and angioedema and a lower incidence of hyperkalemia. Among 12 prespecified subgroups, there was suggestion of heterogeneity with possible benefit with sacubitril-valsartan in patients with lower ejection fraction and in women.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril-valsartan did not result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes among patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction of 45% or higher. (Funded by Novartis; PARAGON-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920711.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31475794     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  370 in total

Review 1.  Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis in Nonischemic Heart Disease, Part 3/4: JACC Focus Seminar.

Authors:  Javier Díez; Arantxa González; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Left atrial assist device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: initial results with torque control mode in diastolic heart failure model.

Authors:  Chihiro Miyagi; Barry D Kuban; Christine R Flick; Anthony R Polakowski; Takuma Miyamoto; Jamshid H Karimov; Randall C Starling; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Update on the Impact of Comorbidities on the Efficacy and Safety of Heart Failure Medications.

Authors:  Christine Chow; Robert J Mentz; Stephen J Greene
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-04-09

4.  Commentary to Impact of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment on Diastolic Function in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Agata Buonacera; Benedetta Stancanelli; Lorenzo Malatino
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training, Moderate Continuous Training, or Guideline-Based Physical Activity Advice on Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stephan Mueller; Ephraim B Winzer; André Duvinage; Andreas B Gevaert; Frank Edelmann; Bernhard Haller; Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher; Paul Beckers; Anna Bobenko; Jennifer Hommel; Caroline M Van de Heyning; Katrin Esefeld; Pia von Korn; Jeffrey W Christle; Mark J Haykowsky; Axel Linke; Ulrik Wisløff; Volker Adams; Burkert Pieske; Emeline M van Craenenbroeck; Martin Halle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effect of a Strategy of Comprehensive Vasodilation vs Usual Care on Mortality and Heart Failure Rehospitalization Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure: The GALACTIC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nikola Kozhuharov; Assen Goudev; Dayana Flores; Micha T Maeder; Joan Walter; Samyut Shrestha; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Mucio Tavares de Oliveira Junior; Zaid Sabti; Beat Müller; Markus Noveanu; Thenral Socrates; Ronny Ziller; Antoni Bayés-Genís; Alessandro Sionis; Patrick Simon; Eleni Michou; Samuel Gujer; Tommaso Gori; Philip Wenzel; Otmar Pfister; David Conen; Ioannis Kapos; Richard Kobza; Hans Rickli; Tobias Breidthardt; Thomas Münzel; Paul Erne; Christian Mueller; Nisha Arenja
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Vericiguat in worsening heart failure: agonising over, or celebrating, agonism in the VICTORIA trial.

Authors:  Ninian N Lang; Stephen J H Dobbin; Mark C Petrie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  On the search for the right definition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka; Karolina Kupczyńska; Piotr Dobrowolski; Błażej Michalski; Miłosz J Jaguszewski; Waldemar Banasiak; Paweł Burchardt; Łukasz Chrzanowski; Szymon Darocha; Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz; Jarosław Drożdż; Marcin Fijałkowski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Marcin Gruchała; Ewa A Jankowska; Piotr Jankowski; Jarosław D Kasprzak; Wojciech Kosmala; Piotr Lipiec; Przemysław Mitkowski; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec; Piotr Szymański; Agnieszka Tycińska; Wojciech Wańha; Maciej Wybraniec; Adam Witkowski; Piotr Ponikowski; On Behalf Of "Club 30" Of The Polish Cardiac Society
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.737

9.  Renal Denervation to Treat Heart Failure.

Authors:  Thomas E Sharp; David J Lefer
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 19.318

Review 10.  Device-based therapies for arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Lucas Lauder; Michel Azizi; Ajay J Kirtane; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.