Sean B Dolan1, Meredith S Berry2,3, Patrick S Johnson4, Matthew W Johnson1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 4. Department of Psychology, California State University, Chico, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using oxytocin as a pharmacotherapy for psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorder. Limited data exist regarding oxytocin's reinforcing efficacy, which is a necessary consideration for novel pharmacotherapies, especially in substance-using populations. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the potential reinforcing effects of intranasally administered oxytocin by assessing behavioral economic demand and subjective effects. METHODS: Healthy adults (n = 23) participated in a double-blind, repeated-measures, laboratory study wherein they received intranasal oxytocin (40 IU) or placebo in a randomized order across two sessions. Participants completed drug purchasing tasks at the conclusion of both sessions. Throughout both sessions, subjective and physiological effects were assessed. RESULTS: Demand-curve analysis of purchasing tasks revealed greater median purchasing for oxytocin relative to placebo. Physiological and subjective effects did not significantly differ between oxytocin and placebo. However, a nonsignificant trend was observed for moderately greater drug liking for oxytocin relative to placebo. There was a significant, positive correlation between the difference in drug liking (between oxytocin and placebo) and the difference in lowest-price purchasing (between oxytocin and placebo). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the potential for limited reinforcing and abuse-related subjective effects of intranasal oxytocin. Given the small sample, the greater drug liking of oxytocin compared to placebo, and the positive relation between demand and drug liking, it is possible that oxytocin may produce reinforcing effects in some participants. Therefore, additional studies of oxytocin reinforcement are warranted.
BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using oxytocin as a pharmacotherapy for psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorder. Limited data exist regarding oxytocin's reinforcing efficacy, which is a necessary consideration for novel pharmacotherapies, especially in substance-using populations. AIMS: This study aimed to determine the potential reinforcing effects of intranasally administered oxytocin by assessing behavioral economic demand and subjective effects. METHODS: Healthy adults (n = 23) participated in a double-blind, repeated-measures, laboratory study wherein they received intranasal oxytocin (40 IU) or placebo in a randomized order across two sessions. Participants completed drug purchasing tasks at the conclusion of both sessions. Throughout both sessions, subjective and physiological effects were assessed. RESULTS: Demand-curve analysis of purchasing tasks revealed greater median purchasing for oxytocin relative to placebo. Physiological and subjective effects did not significantly differ between oxytocin and placebo. However, a nonsignificant trend was observed for moderately greater drug liking for oxytocin relative to placebo. There was a significant, positive correlation between the difference in drug liking (between oxytocin and placebo) and the difference in lowest-price purchasing (between oxytocin and placebo). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the potential for limited reinforcing and abuse-related subjective effects of intranasal oxytocin. Given the small sample, the greater drug liking of oxytocin compared to placebo, and the positive relation between demand and drug liking, it is possible that oxytocin may produce reinforcing effects in some participants. Therefore, additional studies of oxytocin reinforcement are warranted.
Authors: Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Matthew J Baggott; John E Mendelson; Gantt P Galloway; Matthias E Liechti; Cédric M Hysek; Harriet de Wit Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Andrea Burri; Markus Heinrichs; Manfred Schedlowski; Tillmann H C Kruger Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2008-03-28 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Jillian M Rung; Marilyn Horta; Erin M Tammi; Eliany Perez; Marite C Ojeda; Tian Lin; Griffin Harris; Jessie Somerville; Dinia Salmeron; Susan E Beltz; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; David Feifel; Natalie C Ebner Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 4.415