Chongxiang Chen1, Tianmeng Wen2, Wei Liao1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. 2. School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sleep apnea probably brings poor outcomes of chronic heart failure (CHF), and some methods show benefit to patients with heart failure (HF) and central sleep apnea (CSA). Our study based on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to find out the most beneficial therapy of nocturnal support to decrease the apnea hypopnea index (AHI). METHODS: The PubMed, and the Web of Science were used to find out the included studies. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.1 were performed to this systemic review and network meta-analysis. RESULTS: After searching and screening the articles, finally we included 14 articles with total 919 patients, and 4 arms [adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), oxygen treatment, control]. Compared with the control group, the therapeutic regimens did not show significant difference in AHI. Ranking the different nocturnal supports in the order of estimated probabilities of each treatment by using the network meta-analysis, the result showed that ASV was the best one (87.8%), followed by oxygen (12.2%), CPAP (0%), and control (0%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, the adoptive servo ventilation is probably the best choice to down the AHI in patients with HF and CSA.
BACKGROUND: Sleep apnea probably brings poor outcomes of chronic heart failure (CHF), and some methods show benefit to patients with heart failure (HF) and central sleep apnea (CSA). Our study based on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to find out the most beneficial therapy of nocturnal support to decrease the apnea hypopnea index (AHI). METHODS: The PubMed, and the Web of Science were used to find out the included studies. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.1 were performed to this systemic review and network meta-analysis. RESULTS: After searching and screening the articles, finally we included 14 articles with total 919 patients, and 4 arms [adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), oxygen treatment, control]. Compared with the control group, the therapeutic regimens did not show significant difference in AHI. Ranking the different nocturnal supports in the order of estimated probabilities of each treatment by using the network meta-analysis, the result showed that ASV was the best one (87.8%), followed by oxygen (12.2%), CPAP (0%), and control (0%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, the adoptive servo ventilation is probably the best choice to down the AHI in patients with HF and CSA.
Authors: T Douglas Bradley; Alexander G Logan; R John Kimoff; Frédéric Sériès; Debra Morrison; Kathleen Ferguson; Israel Belenkie; Michael Pfeifer; John Fleetham; Patrick Hanly; Mark Smilovitch; George Tomlinson; John S Floras Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael Arzt; John S Floras; Alexander G Logan; R John Kimoff; Frederic Series; Debra Morrison; Kathleen Ferguson; Israel Belenkie; Michael Pfeifer; John Fleetham; Patrick Hanly; Mark Smilovitch; Clodagh Ryan; George Tomlinson; T Douglas Bradley Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 29.690