| Literature DB >> 31475142 |
Tianzi Zhang1, John H Day1, Xiaojing Su1, Arthur G Guadarrama2, Nathan K Sandbo2, Stephane Esnault2, Loren C Denlinger2, Erwin Berthier1, Ashleigh B Theberge1,3.
Abstract
Mechanical forces have long been recognized as fundamental drivers in biological processes, such as embryogenesis, tissue formation and disease regulation. The collagen gel contraction (CGC) assay has served as a classic tool in the field of mechanobiology to study cell-induced contraction of extracellular matrix (ECM), which plays an important role in inflammation and wound healing. In a conventional CGC assay, cell-laden collagen is loaded into a cell culture vessel (typically a well plate) and forms a disk-shaped gel adhering to the bottom of the vessel. The decrement in diameter or surface area of the gel is used as a parameter to quantify the degree of cell contractility. In this study, we developed a microscale CGC assay with an engineered well plate insert that uses surface tension forces to load and manipulate small volumes (14 μL) of cell-laden collagen. The system is easily operated with two pipetting steps and the microscale device moves dynamically as a result of cellular forces. We used a straightforward one-dimensional measurement as the gel contraction readout. We adapted a conventional lung fibroblast CGC assay to demonstrate the functionality of the device, observing significantly more gel contraction when human lung fibroblasts were cultured in serum-containing media vs. serum-free media (p ≤ 0.05). We further cocultured eosinophils and fibroblasts in the system, two important cellular components that lead to fibrosis in asthma, and observed that soluble factors from eosinophils significantly increase fibroblast-mediated gel contraction (p ≤ 0.01). Our microscale CGC device provides a new method for studying downstream ECM effects of intercellular cross talk using 7- to 35-fold less cell-laden gel than traditional CGC assays.Entities:
Keywords: coculture; collagen gel contraction; dynamic; fibrosis; mechanobiology; microfluidics; paracrine signaling
Year: 2019 PMID: 31475142 PMCID: PMC6702460 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1Overview of device configuration and operation. (A) Overview of collagen gel contraction (CGC) device. (i,ii) Schematic drawing of an assembled CGC device, which consists of a collagen loading channel, a free-swing arm, and a retraction tube. (iii) Top down picture showing inserting an assembled CGC device in a 24-well plate. (B) Top view of CGC device operation work flow. (i) 14 μL of cell-laden collagen is loaded into the loading channel; after filling the loading channel, a collagen droplet is formed in between the loading channel and arm head. (ii,iii) 25 μL of cell culture media is pipetted in and out of retraction tube; the arm tail is pulled back into the retraction tube with the flow of the media, causing the collagen droplet to extend into a collagen bridge. (iv) The system is incubated at 37°C for 15 min for collagen to gel; cell culture media is loaded directly into the well plate from top. (v,vi) The top view of the device is captured to determine the angle at starting point (θ) and end point (θ), respectively. The change in θ reflects cell contractility. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 2CGC device characterization using fibroblast contraction in differential serum conditions. (A) Representative images showing the contracting angle, θ, of the same device immediately after loading the cell-laden gel and cell culture media (0 h, top) and after 24 h in culture (bottom), in both serum-free media (left) and media containing 10% FBS (right) (scale bars: 2 mm). (B) Fibroblasts (HFL-1) cultured in media containing 10% FBS contract collagen gel more than fibroblasts cultured in serum-free media. Each data point represents the average of three devices from an independent experiment; three independent experiments were performed. Error bars: SEM of three independent experiments; *indicates significantly different values according to a two-tailed paired Student's t-test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3CGC device application in a coculture system with human fibroblast cells (HFL-1) and eosinophil model cell line (AML14.3D10) to evaluate the effect of soluble factor signaling from eosinophils on fibroblast gel contraction. (A) Schematics of the coculture configuration and workflow. (i) Fibroblast-laden collagen is loaded into the CGC device in a 24-well plate. (ii,iii) Cell culture media is pipetted in and out of retraction tube and the arm tail is pulled back into the retraction tube. (iv) The system is incubated for the collagen to gel; eosinophils are suspended in serum-free F-12K media at a concentration of 3.5 × 107 cells/mL; 2 mL of serum-free media (for monoculture) or cell suspension (for coculture) is added into each well. (v,vi) Top view image is taken to measure θ and θ, respectively. (B) Coculture of fibroblasts with eosinophils augments HFL-1 collagen gel contraction in serum-free media. Each data point represents the average of three devices from an independent experiment; three independent experiments were performed. Error bars: SEM of three independent experiments; **indicates significantly different values according to a two-tailed paired Student's t-test (p ≤ 0.01).