| Literature DB >> 31474994 |
Morganna C Lima1, Leila R de Mendonça1, Antonio M Rezende1, Raquel M Carrera2, Conceição E Aníbal-Silva1, Matthew Demers3, Leonardo D'Aiuto3, Joel Wood3, Kodavali V Chowdari3, Michael Griffiths2, Antonio R Lucena-Araujo4, Manoel Barral-Netto5, Elisa A N Azevedo1, Renan W Alves1, Pablo C S Farias1, Ernesto T A Marques1,6, Priscila M S Castanha6, Claire L Donald7, Alain Kohl7, Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar3,8, Rafael F O Franca1.
Abstract
Zika virus (ZIKV) infection during pregnancy is associated with microcephaly, a congenital malformation resulting from neuroinflammation and direct effects of virus replication on the developing central nervous system (CNS). However, the exact changes in the affected CNS remain unknown. Here, we show by transcriptome analysis (at 48 h post-infection) and multiplex immune profiling that human induced-neuroprogenitor stem cells (hiNPCs) respond to ZIKV infection with a strong induction of type-I interferons (IFNs) and several type-I IFNs stimulated genes (ISGs), notably cytokines and the pro-apoptotic chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10. By comparing the inflammatory profile induced by a ZIKV Brazilian strain with an ancestral strain isolated from Cambodia in 2010, we observed that the response magnitude differs among them. Compared to ZIKV/Cambodia, the experimental infection of hiNPCs with ZIKV/Brazil resulted in a diminished induction of ISGs and lower induction of several cytokines (IFN-α, IL-1α/β, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-15), consequently favoring virus replication. From ZIKV-confirmed infant microcephaly cases, we detected a similar profile characterized by the presence of IFN-α, CXCL10, and CXCL9 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples collected after birth, evidencing a sustained CNS inflammation. Altogether, our data suggest that the CNS may be directly affected due to an unbalanced and chronic local inflammatory response, elicited by ZIKV infection, which contributes to damage to the fetal brain.Entities:
Keywords: Zika congenital syndrome and cytokines; Zika virus; central nervous system; inflammation; interferonopathy; microcephaly; type-I interferon
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31474994 PMCID: PMC6707094 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 2ZIKV-dependent specific cellular processes induced in hiNPCs. (A) Specific networks induced by ZIKV/Brazil (right) and ZIKV/Cambodia (left) infected hiNPCs. Selected modules from the protein-protein interaction network were grouped according to KEGG pathways. Color gradient ranges from blue (down-regulated in infected cells) to red (up-regulated in infected cells), and it represents the mean fold change (log10) in expression levels relative to control (non- infected cells). (B) Gene network (from protein-protein interaction network) represented by a three-dimensional network topology view evidencing a strong upregulation of the interferon response in ZIKV/Brazil infected hiNPCs. (C) Gene network (from protein-protein interaction network) represented by a three-dimensional network topology view evidencing a strong upregulation of the interferon response in ZIKV/Cambodia infected hiNPCs. Color gradient represents the transcriptional activity of infected cells from blue (low activity) to red (high activity). (D) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis in “Biological Process” category statistically overrepresented among all differentially expressed genes. GO terms were represented by 2-fold enrichment value, with p-values <0.05. Infection experiments and control groups were performed in triplicate (n = 3).
Figure 1Transcriptional changes in hiNPCs induced by ZIKV infection. (A) Hierarchical clustering and heatmap of genes that are differentially expressed between non-infected control, ZIKV/Brazil and ZIKV/Cambodia infected hiNPCs. (B–E) Hierarchical clustering of heatmaps presented as normalized read-counts and represented according to different groups of KEGG analyzed pathways. (B) Adaptive immune response. (C) Cytokine and chemokine signaling. (D) Interferon response. (E) Cell death and growth. Heatmaps are representative of all identified expressed transcripts, scale bar represents gene expression of normalized reads counts for each individual triplicate. Color gradient ranges from blue (low RNA-Seq read counts) to red (high RNA-Seq read counts). Single panel lines are representative of individual infection experiments as stated for ZIKV/Brazil, ZIKV/Cambodia and control group (n = 3). Also see Figures S2–S4, which represent STRING functional protein networks analysis for the genes represented in the heatmaps.
Figure 3Induction of cytokine and chemokine production by ZIKV infection in hiNPCs. Individual cytokine and chemokine levels (as indicated on figures) were measured in hiNPCs cell-free supernatants from mock (non-infected), ZIKV/Brazil and ZIKV/Cambodia at 72 h post infection. Data indicate mean and SD of experiments performed in triplicate (n = 3), values are represented in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Groups were compared using non-parametric One-Way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, NS, non-significant.
Figure 4ZIKV replication in hiNPCs. Sequencing results of the infected hiNPCs were mapped to the reference genome of Zika virus (x-axis). The depth of coverage achieved from infected hiNPCs cultures and mock (non-infected control cultures) was calculated for each condition as the total number of reads (average depth), mapped against a reference genome. ZIKV/Brazil infected hiNPCs reads were mapped against the reference genome: ZIKV/Brazil/PE243/2015 (GenBank: , ZIKV/Cambodia infected hiNPCs were mapped against the reference genome ZIKV/Cambodia/FSS13025/2010 (GenBank: . (A) Mock–non-infected cells. (B) hiNPCs infected with ZIKV/Brazil, analyzed at 48 h post infection. (C) hiNPCs infected with ZIKV/Cambodia, analyzed at 48 h post infection. (D) hiNPCs were infected in triplicate (n = 3) with either ZIKV/Brazil or ZIKV/Cambodia at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1. Infectious virus recovery in supernatant at 48 h post infection was determined by plaque titration assay. Values are expressed as mean of plaque forming units per milliliter (PFU/mL). Bars are representative of individual infection experiments performed in triplicate (n = 3).
Figure 5ZIKV infection of human neuroblastoma cells results in cytokine release. (A) SH-SY5Y cells were infected with ZIKV/Brazil (MOI = 1), harvested at 2 days post-infection (dpi), stained with anti-flavivirus envelope (E) protein 4G2 and anti-mouse conjugated with FITC, and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS). (B) SH-SY5Y cells were infected with ZIKV/Brazil (MOI = 1) and the supernatants were processed for viral RNA extraction and qRT-PCR at different days post infection. (C) SH-SY5Y cells were infected with ZIKV/Brazil (MOI = 0.5), supernatants were harvested at 3 dpi and cytokines/chemokines production levels were quantified by Cytometric Bead Array. (D) RT-qPCR results of selected genes related to type-I IFN response. Relative expression (fold change) of mRNA transcripts are shown from infected SH-SY5Y cells (analyzed at 48 h after infection) relative to control group. Mock—cell not infected. Data are represented by mean ± SD. Figures are representative of three independent experiments, performed in triplicate (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, by unpaired Student's t-test.
Characteristics of patients included in the study.
| Male | 10 (37) | 22 (43) |
| Female | 17 (63) | 29 (57) |
| Pre-term | 5 (18.5) | 5 (9.8) |
| Term | 21 (77.8) | 44 (86.2) |
| Post-term | 1 (3.7) | 2 (4) |
| >2,500 g | 19 (70.4) | 39 (76.5) |
| >1,500–2,499.9 g | 8 (29.6) | 10 (19.6) |
| <1,500 g | 0 | 1 (1.95) |
| Not informed | 0 | 1 (1.95) |
| Normal | 27 (100) | 0 |
| <2 SD (microcephaly) | 0 | 11 (21.6) |
| <3 SD (severe microcephaly) | 0 | 40 (78.4) |
| No rash | 26 (96.3) | 35 (68.6) |
| First trimester | 0 | 9 (17.6) |
| Second trimester | 1 (3.7) | 1 (1.95) |
| Third trimester | 0 | 3 (5.9) |
| Yes, unknown period | 0 | 3 (5.9) |
A total of 27 neonates with a discarded diagnosis of microcephaly (healthy controls) were included in this study. Among the confirmed microcephaly and severe microcephaly cases, a total of 51 neonates, which had CSF samples available, were included for further cytokine investigation. All of the neonates had CSF samples collected no later than 4 weeks after birth.
Figure 6Cytokine and chemokine profiles in the CSF of control and microcephaly cases. Individual cytokine and chemokine levels (as indicated on figures) were measured in the CSF of control (n = 27) and ZIKV-induced microcephaly cases (n = 51), and are represented by Tukey box-and-whisker plots showing median, upper and lower quartile, minimum, and maximum values (picograms per milliliter-pg/mL). Outliers are represented by dots outside the 1.5 interquartile range of the 25 respective 75 percentile. Mean values are indicated by a plus (+) sign. Mann-Whitney unpaired test *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, vs. healthy control (exact p-values are described in figures). NS, non-significant vs. healthy control.