| Literature DB >> 31474937 |
Feng Wang1, Elizabeth R Lesser2, Jeremy K Cutsforth-Gregory3, M Tariq Bhatti1,3, Khin P Kilgore1, David O Hodge2, Jonathan Graff-Radford3, Ronald C Petersen3, David S Knopman3, Michelle M Mielke4, Giuseppe Lanzino5, Jaqueline A Leavitt1, John J Chen1,3.
Abstract
Importance: Prior studies evaluating opening pressure (OP) have mostly involved lumbar puncture (LP) for diagnosis of neurologic disease or small cohorts of healthy volunteers and therefore the normal OP is not well-defined. Objective: The goal of this study was to establish the normal range of OP in a community-based population using the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and to evaluate factors that contribute to OP variability. Design: LP OP were obtained from participants aged 32-95 years between 11/1/07 and 10/1/17, as part of routine data collection for the MCSA, a longitudinal, population-based study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Setting: A longitudinal, population-based study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Participants: There were 639 participants (56.8% male; 98.5% white) who underwent LP with recorded OP as part of the MCSA. Intervention: LP. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): LP OP was recorded along with variables that could possibly influence its variability, including age, body mass index (BMI), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Entities:
Keywords: age; idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH); lumbar puncture (LP); mayo clinic study of aging; obesity; obstructive sleep apnea; opening pressure
Year: 2019 PMID: 31474937 PMCID: PMC6706777 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Demographic and clinical characteristics of all study participants.
| 639 | ||
| Mean (SD) | 71.0 (10.9) | |
| 639 | ||
| Mean (SD) | 28.0 (4.6) | |
| Male | 363 (56.8%) | |
| Missing | 252 | |
| White | 383 (99.0%) | |
| Asian | 1 (0.3%) | |
| Multiple | 3 (0.8%) | |
| 639 | ||
| Mean (SD) | 155.4 (41.9) |
Figure 1Histogram of opening pressures (n = 639).
Figure 2Scatter plots for OP vs. BMI. (A) Scatter plot of opening pressure (OP) against body mass index (BMI) showing an increase in OP with higher BMI. (B) Scatter plot of natural log of OP against BMI shows a Pearson Correlation of 0.5.
Figure 3Box plots for OP amongst BMI categories. (A) Box plot of OP against non-obese (BMI < 30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30). Obese patients had an average OP of 180.5 mmH2O (SD 41.9) compared to an average OP of 144.2 mmH2O (SD 36.7) among non-obese patients, p < 0.001. (B) Jitter plot of opening pressure (OP) compared with BMI categories. Average OP was 108.7 (SD 35.2) for patients with BMI < 18.5, 130.7 (SD 33.5) for BMI 18.5–25, 152.5 (SD 35.9) for BMI 25–30, and 180.5 (SD 41.9) for BMI ≥30, p < 0.001.
Figure 4Scatter plots and linear spline model for OP vs. Age. (A) Scatter plot of opening pressure (OP) against age showing a lower OP with higher age. (B) Scatter plot of natural log of OP against age shows a Pearson Correlation (R) of −0.45. (C) Scatter plot of OP against age fit with a linear spline with a knot at age 60. Age was associated with a decrease in OP amongst patients 60 years old or older (R = −0.42), but not associated with OP amongst patients younger than 60 years (R = 0.08).
Figure 5Box plots for OP amongst age categories. Box plot of opening pressure (OP) compared with age categories. Patients <60 years old had an average OP of 184.9 mmH2O (SD 40.6) compared to an average OP of 149.7 mmH2O (SD 39.7) among patients 60 years or older, p < 0.001.
Comparison of variables and their influence on opening pressure.
| <0.001 | |||
| No | 442 (69.2%) | 142 (60-272; 118, 168) | |
| Yes | 197 (30.8%) | 180 (80-314; 150, 210) | |
| 0.012 | |||
| No | 483 (75.6%) | 150 (60-310; 124, 180) | |
| Yes | 156 (24.4%) | 161 (124, 200) | |
| 0.32 | |||
| No | 203 (31.8%) | 158 (68-310; 127, 187) | |
| Yes | 436 (68.2%) | 150 (60-314; 124, 180) | |
| 0.002 | |||
| No | 456 (71.4%) | 157 (60-310; 127.5, 188) | |
| Yes | 183 (28.6%) | 148 (68-314; 120, 170) | |
| 0.62 | |||
| No | 346 (54.1%) | 151 (68-260; 124, 180) | |
| Yes | 293 (45.9%) | 156 (60-314; 126, 182) | |
| 0.029 | |||
| No | 266 (41.6%) | 160 (60-264; 130, 186) | |
| Yes | 373 (58.4%) | 150 (62-314; 124, 180) | |
| 0.070 | |||
| No | 485 (75.9%) | 156 (60-314; 124, 186) | |
| Yes | 154 (24.1%) | 150 (62-260; 124.5, 170) | |
| 0.15 | |||
| Missing | 44 | ||
| No | 471 (79.2%) | 150 (60-314; 124, 180) | |
| Yes | 124 (20.8%) | 158 (62-260; 124, 194.5) | |
| 0.99 | |||
| Missing | 44 | ||
| No | 552 (92.8%) | 152 (60-314; 124, 180.5) | |
| Yes | 43 (7.2%) | 152 (80-256; 128, 181) | |
| 0.19 | |||
| Missing | 1 | ||
| 0 | 1 (0.2%) | 114 (114, 114) | |
| 20 | 523 (82.0%) | 152 (60-310; 124, 182) | |
| 22 | 114 (17.9%) | 160 (68-314; 130.5, 185.5) | |
| 0.99 | |||
| Male | 363 (56.8%) | 152 (62-314; 124, 181) | |
| Female | 276 (43.2%) | 153 (60-310; 125.5, 182) | |
| N/A | |||
| Missing | 250 | ||
| White | 383 (99.0%) | 160 (60-314; 129, 188) | |
| Asian | 1 (0.3%) | 90 (90, 90) | |
| Multiple | 3 (0.8%) | 146 (118-180; 132, 163) |
Wilcoxon Test;
Kruskal Wallis Test. Because of the low frequency among racial groups, p-value was not calculated for race.
Figure 6Bland Altman plot for the 79 patients with multiple OPs measured within 2.5 years of each other.