| Literature DB >> 31474929 |
Hanne Stotesbury1, Jamie M Kawadler1, Patrick W Hales1, Dawn E Saunders1,2, Christopher A Clark1, Fenella J Kirkham1,3,4,5.
Abstract
It is well-established that patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at substantial risk of neurological complications, including overt and silent stroke, microstructural injury, and cognitive difficulties. Yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, partly because findings have largely been considered in isolation. Here, we review mechanistic pathways for which there is accumulating evidence and propose an integrative systems-biology framework for understanding neurological risk. Drawing upon work from other vascular beds in SCD, as well as the wider stroke literature, we propose that macro-circulatory hyper-perfusion, regions of relative micro-circulatory hypo-perfusion, and an exhaustion of cerebral reserve mechanisms, together lead to a state of cerebral vascular instability. We suggest that in this state, tissue oxygen supply is fragile and easily perturbed by changes in clinical condition, with the potential for stroke and/or microstructural injury if metabolic demand exceeds tissue oxygenation. This framework brings together recent developments in the field, highlights outstanding questions, and offers a first step toward a linking pathophysiological explanation of neurological risk that may help inform future screening and treatment strategies.Entities:
Keywords: anemia; cerebral hemodynamics; cerebrovascular reserve; oxygen extraction fraction; sickle cell disease; silent cerebral infarction; stroke; vascular instability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31474929 PMCID: PMC6705232 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Neurological complications. Time of flight angiography image overlaid on 3D rendered Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) image, edited to depict common neurological complications in SCD.
Figure 2Systems biology framework. Proposed Model of neurological risk emphasizing role for vascular instability. Highlighting several potential mutually enforcing pathways. Different colors used to differentiate different mechanistic pathways, and to distinguish them from outcomes.
Figure 3Watershed vulnerability. Results from collection of studies illustrating watershed vulnerability in SCD. (A) Top: SCI density map from 286 SCD children. Bottom: region encompassing 5.6% of brain volume in which 90% of SCI were confined [from Ford et al. (31)]. (B) Regions in which 20 SCD children without SCI demonstrated reduced white-matter density compared to 31 controls [from Baldeweg et al. (73)]. (C) Top: Ratiometric maps showing regions of elevated OEF derived from the ratio of SCD (n = 36) to control (n = 20) OEF values. (C) Middle: Region of high OEF (threshold 1.6, outlined in blue) overlaid on the average CBF map from the SCD cohort. (C) Bottom: Region of elevated OEF overlaid on SCI density map created from an independent cohort of 23 participants with SCD [from Fields et al. (166)].