Literature DB >> 31474576

Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review.

Hidemichi Kihara1, Wataru Hatakeyama2, Futoshi Komine3, Kyoko Takafuji2, Toshiyuki Takahashi2, Jun Yokota2, Kenta Oriso2, Hisatomo Kondo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The digitization of the dental field has been vigorously promoted in recent years. An impression using an intraoral scanner is considered to significantly change future dental treatment. The purpose of this review is to evaluate accuracy and practicality of various intraoral scanners and verification method of intraoral scanners. STUDY SELECTION: This review was based on articles searched through the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. The main keywords that were employed during the search were "Oral Scanner, Intraoral Scanners, Desktop Scanner, and Digital Impression". RESULT: It was reported that illuminance and color temperature affected trueness and precision of intraoral scanners. The repeatability of intraoral scanners indicated the possibility of producing fixed prostheses within the range of being partially edentulous. It is considered difficult to use intraoral scanners in fabricating cross-arch fixed prostheses. However, with intraoral scanners, it may be considered possible to fabricate mouth guards and dentures equivalent to those of desktop scanners. Current intraoral scanner scans are considered more comfortable than traditional impressions that use irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials.
CONCLUSION: Since the intraoral scanner is an evolving device, further improvement in accuracy is expected in the future. In addition, verification of the accuracy of intraoral scanners must be conducted accordingly.
Copyright © 2019 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Desktop scanner; Digital dentistry; Digital impression; Intraoral scanner

Year:  2019        PMID: 31474576     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont Res        ISSN: 1883-1958            Impact factor:   4.642


  24 in total

1.  [In vitro evaluation of the application of digital individual tooth tray in the impression making of mandibular full-arch crown abutments].

Authors:  X X Xu; Y Cao; Y J Zhao; L Jia; Q F Xie
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 2.  Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies.

Authors:  Lin Kong; Yabing Li; Zhijian Liu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods.

Authors:  Jiahui Ye; Shimin Wang; Zixuan Wang; Yunsong Liu; Yuchun Sun; Hongqiang Ye; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  In Vitro Comparison of Three Intraoral Scanners for Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses.

Authors:  Vitória Costa; António Sérgio Silva; Rosana Costa; Pedro Barreiros; Joana Mendes; José Manuel Mendes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria.

Authors:  Ivett Róth; Alexandra Czigola; Dóra Fehér; Viktória Vitai; Gellért Levente Joós-Kovács; Péter Hermann; Judit Borbély; Bálint Vecsei
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 6.  3D Digital Impression Systems Compared with Traditional Techniques in Dentistry: A Recent Data Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marco Cicciù; Luca Fiorillo; Cesare D'Amico; Dario Gambino; Emanuele Mario Amantia; Luigi Laino; Salvatore Crimi; Paola Campagna; Alberto Bianchi; Alan Scott Herford; Gabriele Cervino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Accuracy evaluation of 3D printed interim prosthesis fabrication using a CBCT scanning based digital model.

Authors:  Young Hyun Kim; Bock-Young Jung; Sang-Sun Han; Chang-Woo Woo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Can Dental Office Lighting Intensity Conditions Influence the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning?

Authors:  Anca Jivanescu; Andrei-Bogdan Faur; Raul Nicolae Rotar
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.932

9.  Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.

Authors:  Naiyu Cui; Jiayin Wang; Xingyu Hou; Shixun Sun; Qixuan Huang; Ho-Kyung Lim; HongXin Cai; Qi Jia; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.932

10.  Reliability of a Virtual Prosthodontic Project Realized through a 2D and 3D Photographic Acquisition: An Experimental Study on the Accuracy of Different Digital Systems.

Authors:  Luca Lavorgna; Gabriele Cervino; Luca Fiorillo; Giovanni Di Leo; Giuseppe Troiano; Marco Ortensi; Luigi Galantucci; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.