Literature DB >> 31474350

Days alive and out of hospital after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: an observational cohort study in 16 137 patients.

Christoffer C Jørgensen1, Pelle B Petersen2, Henrik Kehlet2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Days alive and out of hospital (DAH) has been proposed as a pragmatic outcome measure of surgical quality. However, there is a lack of procedure specific data or data within an optimised fast-track protocol. Furthermore, information about influence of follow-up duration and types of complications on DAH is limited.
METHODS: Observational multicentre cohort study of patients undergoing fast-track total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prospective information on comorbidity and complete 90 days follow-up was undertaken through the Danish National Patient Register and chart review.
RESULTS: For 16 137 procedures, of which 18.6% were high-risk (≥2 preoperative risk factors), the median length of stay was 2 days (inter-quartile range [IQR], 2-3), and 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 5.7% and 8.1%, respectively. Median DAH30 and DAH90 days were 27 (26-28) and 87 (85-88) vs 28 (27-28) and 88 (87-89) (P<0.001) in high-vs low-risk patients, respectively. The fraction with DAH ≤25 at 30 days and DAH ≤85 at 90 days was increased in high-vs low-risk patients: 23.3% vs 6.8% (odds ratio [OR]=4.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.73-4.65) and 26.0% vs 8.6% (OR=3.75; 95% CI, 3.38-4.16). There were relatively fewer 'surgical' complications in high- vs low-risk patients with DAH30 ≤25 (14.6% vs 25.8%) (OR=0.49; 95% CI, 0.37-0.65) and DAH90 ≤85 (16.9% vs 31.89%) (OR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.56). About 2% of patients had readmissions, but DAH was >25 and >85 at 30 and 90 days after operation, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Median DAH in fast-track THA/TKA patients is 28 at 30 days and 88 at 90 days after surgery. DAH in high-risk patients was only slightly reduced compared with low-risk patients, but they have relatively more 'medical' complications.
Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enhanced recovery; fast-track surgery; hip replacement; knee replacement; perioperative medicine; postoperative outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31474350     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  3 in total

Review 1.  History and future challenges in fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Kehlet
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  An evaluation of the outcome metric 'days alive and at home' in older patients after hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  A Wu; M T Fahey; D Cui; B El-Behesy; D A Story
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 12.893

3.  Quality of recovery after total hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa: a national prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ulla Plenge; Romy Parker; Shamiela Davids; Gareth L Davies; Zahnne Fullerton; Lindsay Gray; Penelope Groenewald; Refqah Isaacs; Ntambue Kauta; Frederik M Louw; Andile Mazibuko; David M North; Marc Nortje; Glen M Nunes; Neo Pebane; Chantal Rajah; John Roos; Paul Ryan; Winlecia V September; Heidi Shanahan; Ruth E Siebritz; Rian W Smit; Simon Sombili; Alexandra Torborg; Johan F van der Merwe; Nico van der Westhuizen; Bruce Biccard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.