Literature DB >> 31474269

Influence of maxillary canine impaction characteristics and factors associated with orthodontic treatment on the duration of active orthodontic traction.

Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén1, Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo2, Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora3, Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas4, Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic traction of a maxillary impacted canine (MIC) increases the orthodontic treatment time. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of MIC characteristics and factors associated with orthodontic treatment on the duration of active orthodontic traction.
METHODS: This follow-up and retrospective study included 45 MICs orthodontically tractioned into the occlusal plane with the use of a standardized protocol. MIC characteristics, including type, sector, side, location, height, and complexity of impaction, as well as α and β angles and canine root length and area were measured. Likewise, factors associated with orthodontic treatment, including sex, age, malocclusion, premolar extractions, previous incisor root resorption, ANB, APDI, and SNA angles, and PNS-ANS distance were also evaluated. The statistical analysis included multiple linear regressions to estimate the influence of all variables on the duration of traction (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: Sex had significant influence (P = 0.027) on the time of traction; in female patients, the time was 2.05 months more than in male patients. Bilateral impaction treatment increased the time by 2.74 months compared with unilateral cases (P = 0.001). Traction of bicortically centered impacted canines increased the duration of traction by 2.85 months (P = 0.001). Finally, the traction time increased in 2.35 months (P = 0.046) when the impaction sectors were 4 or 5 (close to the midline).
CONCLUSIONS: The duration of active orthodontic traction of MIC is mainly influenced by sex, bilateral type, bicortically centered location, or when MIC is located in sector 4 or 5 close to midline, increasing the traction time by some months.
Copyright © 2019 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31474269     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  3 in total

1.  A new guide using CBCT to identify the severity of maxillary canine impaction and predict the best method of intervention.

Authors:  Fadia M Alhummayani; Zeinab A Mustafa
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2021-02-19

2.  Immediate Post-Extraction Short Implant Placement with Immediate Loading and without Extraction of an Impacted Maxillary Canine: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  José Antonio Moreno-Rodríguez; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Miguel Ramón Pecci-Lloret
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Reducing the Burden of Care: Multidisciplinary Management of Late-Manifested Crouzon Syndrome-A Case Report.

Authors:  Sarah Achterrath; Teresa Kruse; Julia Neuschulz; Isabelle Graf; Joachim Zöller; Bert Braumann
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.