Literature DB >> 31474141

Femoral lengthening using the Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system: outcome comparison following antegrade and retrograde nails.

Peter R Calder1, Joseph E McKay2, Anna J Timms1, Tracy Roskrow1, Sharon Fugazzotto1, Penina Edel1, W D Goodier1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system has demonstrated significant benefits over external fixation lengthening methods, leading to a paradigm shift in limb lengthening. This study compares outcomes following antegrade and retrograde femoral lengthening in both adolescent and adult patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was undertaken of a consecutive series of 107 femoral lengthening operations in 92 patients. In total, 73 antegrade nails and 34 retrograde nails were inserted. Outcome was assessed by the regenerate healing index (HI), hip and knee range of movement (ROM), and the presence of any complications.
RESULTS: The mean lengthening was 4.65 cm (1.5 to 8) in the antegrade group and 4.64 cm (1.6 to 8) in the retrograde group. Of the 107 lengthenings, 100 had sufficient datapoints to calculate the mean HI. This was 31.6 days/cm (15 to 108). There was a trend toward a lower (better) HI with an antegrade nail and better outcomes in adolescent patients, but these were not statistically significant. Hip and knee ROM was maintained and/or improved following commencement of femoral lengthening in 44 patients (60%) of antegrade nails and 13 patients (38%) of retrograde nails. In female patients, loss of movement occurred both earlier and following less total length achieved. Minor implant complications included locking bolt migration and in one patient deformity of the nail, but no implant failed to lengthen and there were no deep infections. Three patients had delayed union, five patients required surgical intervention for joint contracture.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms excellent results in femoral lengthening with antegrade and retrograde Precice nails. There is a trend for better healing and less restriction in hip and knee movement following antegrade nails. There are clinical scenarios, that mandate the use of a retrograde nail. However, when these are not present, we recommend the use of antegrade nailing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1168-1176.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antegrade; Bone healing index; Femoral lengthening; Precice lengthening nail; Range of movement; Retrograde

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31474141     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1271.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  15 in total

1.  What Factors Correlate With Length of Stay and Readmission After Limb Lengthening Procedures? A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Ashish Mittal; Sachin Allahabadi; Rishab Jayaram; Abhinav Nalluri; Matt Callahan; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  What Are the Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Magnetically Driven Antegrade Intramedullary Lengthening Nails for Femoral Lengthening to Treat Leg Length Discrepancy?

Authors:  Adrien Frommer; Robert Roedl; Georg Gosheger; Maike Niemann; Dominik Turkowski; Gregor Toporowski; Christoph Theil; Andrea Laufer; Bjoern Vogt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  All Internal Bone Transport: Use of a Lengthening Nail and Double Plating for Management of Femoral Bone Loss.

Authors:  Jonathan Wright; Peter Bates; Nima Heidari; Alexandros Vris
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2019 May-Aug

4.  Hip-Sparing Equalization Procedures for Leg-Length Discrepancy After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Asim M Makhdom; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-07-24

5.  Thromboprophylaxis in Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Surgery.

Authors:  Alexios D Iliadis; Anna Timms; Sharron Fugazzotto; Penina Edel; Simon Britten; Jonathan Wright; David Goodier; Peter Calder
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2020 Sep-Dec

6.  The Joint Angle Tool for Intraoperative Assessment of Coronal Alignment of the Lower Limb.

Authors:  Ahmed A-H Abood; Juozas Petruskevicius; Björn Vogt; Adrien Frommer; Robert Rödl; Jan Duedal Rölfing
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2020 Sep-Dec

7.  Intramedullary Antibiotic Depot Does Not Preclude Successful Intramedullary Lengthening or Compression.

Authors:  Jessica C Rivera; Philip K McClure; Austin T Fragomen; Samir Mehta; S Robert Rozbruch; Janet D Conway
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.884

8.  Combined antegrade femur lengthening and distal deformity correction: a case series.

Authors:  Achraf Jardaly; Shawn R Gilbert
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Comparison of Intramedullary Magnetic Nail, Monolateral External Distractor, and Spatial External Fixator in Femur Lengthening in Adolescents with Congenital Diseases.

Authors:  Szymon Pietrzak; Dariusz Grzelecki; Tomasz Parol; Jarosław Czubak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Systematic review of complications with externally controlled motorized intramedullary bone lengthening nails (FITBONE and PRECICE) in 983 segments.

Authors:  Markus W Frost; Ole Rahbek; Jens Traerup; Adriano A Ceccotti; Søren Kold
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.