Literature DB >> 31474135

Alternating operating theatre utilization is not associated with differences in clinical or economic outcome measures in primary elective knee arthroplasty.

William S Murphy1,2, Samantha Harris1,2, Vartan Pahalyants1,2, Mark M Zaki1,2, Ben Lin3, Tony Cheng3, Carl Talmo4, Stephen B Murphy4.   

Abstract

AIMS: The practice of alternating operating theatres has long been used to reduce surgeon idle time between cases. However, concerns have been raised as to the safety of this practice. We assessed the payments and outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed during overlapping and nonoverlapping days, also comparing the total number of the surgeon's cases and the total time spent in the operating theatre per day.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Limited Data Set (LDS) on all primary elective TKAs performed at the New England Baptist Hospital between January 2013 and June 2016. Using theatre records, episodes were categorized into days where a surgeon performed overlapping and nonoverlapping lists. Clinical outcomes, economic outcomes, and demographic factors were calculated. A regression model controlling for the patient-specific factors was used to compare groups. Total orthopaedic cases and aggregate time spent operating (time between skin incision and closure) were also compared.
RESULTS: A total of 3633 TKAs were performed (1782 on nonoverlapping days; 1851 on overlapping days). There were no differences between the two groups for length of inpatient stay, payments, mortality, emergency room visits, or readmission during the 90-day postoperative period. The overlapping group had 0.74 fewer skilled nursing days (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.26 to -1.22; p < 0.01), and 0.66 more home health visits (95% CI 0.14 to 1.18; p = 0.01) than the nonoverlapping group. On overlapping days, surgeons performed more cases per day (5.01 vs 3.76; p < 0.001) and spent more time operating (484.55 minutes vs 357.17 minutes; p < 0.001) than on nonoverlapping days.
CONCLUSION: The study shows that the practice of alternating operating theatres for TKA has no adverse effect on the clinical outcome or economic utilization variables measured. Furthermore, there is opportunity to increase productivity with alternating theatres as surgeons with overlapping cases perform more cases and spend more time operating per day. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1081-1086.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternating surgery; Arthroplasty; Cost; Knee; Outcomes; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31474135     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1485.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  3 in total

1.  Influence of team composition on turnover and efficiency of total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eli M Cahan; Henry C Cousins; Joshua T Steere; Nicole A Segovia; Matthew D Miller; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 2.  CORR Synthesis: What Is the Current Understanding of Overlapping Surgery in Orthopaedics, Particularly as it Relates to Patient Outcomes and Perceptions?

Authors:  Daniel Pereira; Donald H Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  The effect of overlapping surgical scheduling on operating theatre productivity: a narrative review.

Authors:  J J Pandit; S K Ramachandran; M Pandit
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 12.893

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.