Literature DB >> 31473796

Significant Differences in Body Plethysmography Measurements Between Hospitals in Patients Referred for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.

Jorrit B A Welling1,2,3, Jorine E Hartman4,5, Nick H T Ten Hacken4,5, Sonja W S Augustijn4,5, Huib A M Kerstjens4,5, Dirk-Jan Slebos4,5, Karin Klooster4,5.   

Abstract

During the evaluation of potential bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) candidates in our hospital, we frequently observe patients with a lower residual volume (RV) value compared to the value measured in their referring hospital, although both measured by body plethysmography. We explored to what degree RV and other pulmonary function measurements match between referring hospitals and our hospital. We retrospectively analyzed a total of 300 patients with severe emphysema [38% male, median age 62 years (range 38-81), median forced expiratory volume in 1 s 29% (range 14-65) of predicted, and a median of 40 packyears (range 2-125)]. We measured a median RV of 4.47 l (range 1.70-7.57), which was a median 310 ml lower than in the referring hospitals (range - 3.04 to + 1.94), P < 0.001). In conclusion, this retrospective analysis demonstrated differences in RV measurements between different hospitals in patients with severe emphysema. Overestimation of RV can lead to unnecessary referrals for BLVR and potential treatment failures. To avoid disappointment and unnecessary hospital visits, it is important that body plethysmography measurements are accurately performed by applying preferably the unlinked method in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body plethysmography; Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction; Emphysema; Residual volume

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473796     DOI: 10.1007/s00408-019-00265-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung        ISSN: 0341-2040            Impact factor:   2.584


  15 in total

1.  Discrepancies between pediatric laboratories in pulmonary function results from healthy children.

Authors:  James Paton; Caroline Beardsmore; Aidan Laverty; Caroline King; Cara Oliver; David Young; Janet Stocks
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2011-10-28

Review 2.  Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes.

Authors:  J Wanger; J L Clausen; A Coates; O F Pedersen; V Brusasco; F Burgos; R Casaburi; R Crapo; P Enright; C P M van der Grinten; P Gustafsson; J Hankinson; R Jensen; D Johnson; N Macintyre; R McKay; M R Miller; D Navajas; R Pellegrino; G Viegi
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Differences in plethysmographic lung volumes. Effects of linked vs unlinked spirometry.

Authors:  J H Williams; H Z Bencowitz
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation - Update 2017.

Authors:  Felix J F Herth; Dirk-Jan Slebos; Gerard J Criner; Pallav L Shah
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.580

5.  Methods for Measuring Lung Volumes: Is There a Better One?

Authors:  Claudio Tantucci; Damiano Bottone; Andrea Borghesi; Michele Guerini; Federico Quadri; Laura Pini
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.580

6.  Determining the Role of Dynamic Hyperinflation in Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Karin Klooster; Nick H T ten Hacken; Jorine E Hartman; Frank C Sciurba; Huib A M Kerstjens; Dirk-Jan Slebos
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.580

7.  A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE).

Authors:  Gerard J Criner; Richard Sue; Shawn Wright; Mark Dransfield; Hiram Rivas-Perez; Tanya Wiese; Frank C Sciurba; Pallav L Shah; Momen M Wahidi; Hugo Goulart de Oliveira; Brian Morrissey; Paulo F G Cardoso; Steven Hays; Adnan Majid; Nicholas Pastis; Lisa Kopas; Mark Vollenweider; P Michael McFadden; Michael Machuzak; David W Hsia; Arthur Sung; Nabil Jarad; Malgorzata Kornaszewska; Stephen Hazelrigg; Ganesh Krishna; Brian Armstrong; Narinder S Shargill; Dirk-Jan Slebos
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation - Update 2019.

Authors:  Felix J F Herth; Dirk-Jan Slebos; Gerard J Criner; Arschang Valipour; Frank Sciurba; Pallav L Shah
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 9.  Lung volume reduction for emphysema.

Authors:  Pallav L Shah; Felix J Herth; Wouter H van Geffen; Gaetan Deslee; Dirk-Jan Slebos
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Endobronchial Valves for Emphysema without Interlobar Collateral Ventilation.

Authors:  Karin Klooster; Nick H T ten Hacken; Jorine E Hartman; Huib A M Kerstjens; Eva M van Rikxoort; Dirk-Jan Slebos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.