Literature DB >> 31473784

Ulnar trochlear notch articular surface has three morphological patterns: a neglected major anatomical feature.

Trifon Totlis1, Nikolaos Otountzidis2, Stavros Papadopoulos2, Maria Piagkou3, Konstantinos Natsis2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The typical anatomical illustration of the trochlear notch articular surface includes a transverse rough non-articular ridge which separates the olecranon and coronoid part of the joint. This transverse ridge, the "bare area", is not covered by cartilage and represents the optimal entry point for olecranon osteotomies. Aim of the present study was to encounter the anatomical variations in the morphology of the trochlear notch articular surface.
METHODS: Two-hundred seventy-three dried ulnae were inspected and a qualitative classification of the variations of the trochlear notch articular surface was done. Correlation to gender and side was examined.
RESULTS: Three distinct morphological patterns were observed. Separate olecranon and coronoid facets (Type I) were the most common pattern (165/273, 60.4%). Partial fusion of olecranon and coronoid facets (Type II) was observed in 75 out of 273 bones (27.5%), while a single olecranon and coronoid facet (Type III) was present in 33 out of 273 bones (12.1%). The occurrence of Type II and III was significantly more common in females (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The most common morphological pattern of the proximal ulna articular surface was the olecranon and coronoid facets separated by the transverse ridge, which is considered as the typical anatomical pattern. The partial fusion of olecranon and coronoid facets was the second most common pattern (27.5%) and the single olecranon and coronoid facet with no transverse ridge present was the rarest one (12.1%). These variations affect the area covered by cartilage. They are noticeable in an elbow MRI and they may have implications on olecranon osteotomy. Absence of the transverse ridge may confuse the surgeon during elbow arthroscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical variations; Bare area; Elbow anatomy; Elbow arthroscopy; Proximal ulna; Sigmoid notch

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473784     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02310-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  6 in total

1.  The proximal ulna: An anatomic study with relevance to olecranon osteotomy and fracture fixation.

Authors:  Angela A Wang; Michael Mara; Douglas T Hutchinson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Thickness distribution of the subchondral mineralization zone of the trochlear notch and its correlation with the cartilage thickness: an expression of functional adaptation to mechanical stress acting on the humeroulnar joint?

Authors:  S Milz; F Eckstein; R Putz
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1997-06

3.  MR imaging of the elbow: normal variant and potential diagnostic pitfalls of the trochlear groove and cubital tunnel.

Authors:  Z S Rosenberg; J Beltran; Y Cheung; M Broker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  CT arthrography and anatomical correlation of the bare area of the ulnar trochlear fossa: a risk of misdiagnosis of cartilage ulcerations.

Authors:  Estelle-Marie Kieffer; Julia Bouchaib; Guillaume Bierry; Philippe Clavert
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  A contribution to the functional morphology of articular surfaces.

Authors:  B Tillmann
Journal:  Norm Pathol Anat (Stuttg)       Date:  1978

6.  [Transverse groove of the elbow joint. A biomechanical interpretation of its origin].

Authors:  W Oberländer; R Breul; H J Kurrat
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.