Literature DB >> 31473657

Intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene editing.

Bryan Cwik1.   

Abstract

Design of clinical trials for germline gene editing stretches current accepted standards for human subjects research. Among the challenges involved is a set of issues concerning intergenerational monitoring-long-term follow-up study of subjects and their descendants. Because changes made at the germline would be heritable, germline gene editing could have adverse effects on individuals' health that can be passed on to future generations. Determining whether germline gene editing is safe and effective for clinical use thus may require intergenerational monitoring. The aim of this paper is to identify and argue for the significance of a set of ethical issues raised by intergenerational monitoring in future clinical trials of germline gene editing. Though long-term, multigenerational follow-up study of this kind is not without precedent, intergenerational monitoring in this context raises unique ethical challenges, challenges that go beyond existing protocols and standards for human subjects research. These challenges will need to be addressed if clinical trials of germline gene editing are ever pursued. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Gene Therapy/Transfer; Reproductive Medicine; Research Ethics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473657     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

Review 1.  Responsible Translational Pathways for Germline Gene Editing?

Authors:  Bryan Cwik
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2020-08-21

2.  Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.

Authors:  Bryan Cwik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Days of Future Past: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on "Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes".

Authors:  Bryan Cwik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing.

Authors:  Bonginkosi Shozi; Tamanda Kamwendo; Julian Kinderlerer; Donrich W Thaldar; Beverley Townsend; Marietjie Botes
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.