Literature DB >> 31473647

Blind exchange with mini-pinning technique for distal occlusion thrombectomy.

Diogo C Haussen1, Alhamza R Al-Bayati1, Brendan Eby1, Krishnan Ravindran1, Gabriel Martins Rodrigues1, Michael R Frankel1, Raul G Nogueira1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Technical improvements to enhance distal occlusion thrombectomy are desirable. We describe the blind catheter exchange technique and report the pinning technique with small devices ('mini-pinning') for distal occlusions.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database from January 2015 to August 2018 was performed for cases of distal occlusion in which the 'blind exchange/mini-pinning' (BEMP) techniques were used. The technique involves the deployment of a 3 mm Trevo retriever followed by microcatheter removal and blind advancement of a 3MAX aspiration catheter over the bare retriever delivery wire ('blind exchange') until clot contact under aspiration. The retriever is subsequently partially recaptured in order to 'cork' the thrombus ('mini-pinning') and the system pulled as a unit. Patients with distal occlusions treated with BEMP and standard techniques (either 3 mm Trevo or 3MAX) were compared.
RESULTS: Twenty-five vessels were treated in 22 patients. The majority of patients had isolated distal occlusions predominantly in the distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) segments, half of which involved the superior division. The comparison between BEMP (n=25 vessels) and standard techniques (n=144 vessels) revealed balanced groups. One of the highlighted differences was the more distal MCA occlusions among those who underwent BEMP (M3 occlusions 52% vs 22%; p=0.001). Otherwise, the vessel, segments, divisions and luminal diameter were comparable. There was a higher rate of first-pass modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3 (80% vs 56%; p=0.03) and a trend towards higher rates of first-pass full reperfusion (60% vs 40%; p=0.07) with BEMP compared with standard techniques. Final reperfusion and clinical outcomes were comparable.
CONCLUSION: BEMP appears to be a safe and effective technique for the treatment of distal occlusions. Additional studies are warranted. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  stent; stroke; thrombectomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473647     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  4 in total

1.  Delayed Rupture of an Anterior Communicating Artery Pseudoaneurysm Caused by Distal Occlusion Thrombectomy Using a Stent Retriever: A Case Report and Mechanism of Injury.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Shim; Youngrok Do; Jin Kuk Do; Sung Won Youn
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  Blind Exchange With Mini-Pinning Technique Using the Tron Stent Retriever for Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Occlusion Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Takeshi Yoshimoto; Kanta Tanaka; Junpei Koge; Masayuki Shiozawa; Hiroshi Yamagami; Manabu Inoue; Naruhiko Kamogawa; Tetsu Satow; Hiroharu Kataoka; Kazunori Toyoda; Masafumi Ihara; Masatoshi Koga
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Influence of intravenous alteplase on endovascular treatment decision-making in acute ischemic stroke due to primary medium-vessel occlusion: a case-based survey study.

Authors:  Manon Kappelhof; Johanna Ospel; Nima Kashani; Petra Cimflova; Nishita Singh; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Bijoy K Menon; Jens Fiehler; Michael Chen; Nobuyuki Sakai; Mayank Goyal
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 8.572

4.  Combined Approach to Stroke Thrombectomy Using a Novel Short Flexible Aspiration Catheter with a Stent Retriever : Preliminary Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Remollo; Mikel Terceño; Mariano Werner; Carlos Castaño; María Hernández-Pérez; Jordi Blasco; Luis San Román; Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella; Santiago Thió-Henestrosa; Víctor Cuba; Alfredo Gimeno; Josep Puig
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.156

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.