| Literature DB >> 31473593 |
Pieter D'Hooghe1, Alberto Grassi2, Khalid Alkhelaifi3, James Calder4, Thomas P A Baltes5,6,7, Stefano Zaffagnini2, Jan Ekstrand3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate time to return to play following surgical stabilisation of isolated unstable syndesmosis injuries in a cohort of professional male football players.Entities:
Keywords: high ankle sprain; professional football player; return to play; syndesmosis; syndesmotic rupture
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31473593 PMCID: PMC7513252 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Sports Med ISSN: 0306-3674 Impact factor: 13.800
Figure 1Graphic anatomical image of the three syndesmotic ankle ligaments. AITFL, anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament; IOL, interosseous ligament; PITFL, posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament.
Figure 2Selection algorithm to decide on inclusion in the study.
Patientand injury characteristics
| Total | Grade IIB (n=75) | Grade III (n=35) | P value | |
| Age | 24.9±4.0 | 25.4±4.1 | 23.8±3.3 | 0.0586 |
| Dominant leg | 1 | |||
| No | 45 (40%) | 31 (41%) | 14 (40%) | |
| Yes | 65 (60%) | 44 (59%) | 21 (60%) | |
| Grade | ||||
| IIB | 75 (68%) | 75 (100%) | 0 (0%) | NA |
| III | 35 (32%) | 0 (0%) | 35 (100%) | |
| Cartilage injury | =1.0000 | |||
| No | 87 (79%) | 66 (88%) | 21 (60%) | |
| Yes | 23 (21%) | 9 (12%) | 14 (40%) | |
| Reinjury | =1.0000 | |||
| No | 102 (93%) | 69 (92%) | 33 (94%) | |
| Yes | 8 (7%) | 6 (8%) | 2 (6%) | |
| Event | ||||
| Training | 34 (31%) | 25 (33%) | 9 (26%) | =0.5091 |
| Match | 76 (69%) | 50 (67%) | 26 (74%) | |
| Mechanism | =0.0001* | |||
| Contact | 40 (36%) | 15 (20%) | 25 (71%) | |
| Non-contact | 70 (64%) | 60 (80%) | 10 (29%) | |
| Situation | =0.0001* | |||
| Tackled | 40 (36%) | 15 (20%) | 25 (71%) | |
| Twist | 40 (36%) | 33 (44%) | 7 (20%) | |
| Landing from jump | 17 (16%) | 14 (19%) | 3 (9%) | |
| Unknown | 13 (12%) | 13 (17%) | 0 (0%) |
Postoperative return to sport activities
| Time landmarks | Return to on field rehabilitation | Return to train with team | Return to first match | ||||
| 0 months |
| – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14 days (2 weeks) | 0% | (SE 0%) | – | – | – | – | |
| 21 days (3 weeks) | 4% | (SE 2%) | 0% | (SE 0%) | – | – | |
| 28 days (4 weeks) | 19% | (SE 4%) | 1% | (SE 1%) | – | – | |
|
|
|
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| 42 days (6 weeks) | 76% | (SE 4%) | 10% | (SE 3%) | 0% | (SE 0%) | |
| 49 days (7 weeks) | 86% | (SE 3%) | 20% | (SE 4%) | 1% | (SE 1%) | |
| 56 days (8 weeks) | 94% | (SE 2%) | 35% | (SE 5%) | 2% | (SE 1%) | |
| 2 months |
|
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| 70 days (10 weeks) | 98% | (SE 1%) | 56% | (SE 5%) | 5% | (SE 2%) | |
| 77 days (11 weeks) | 99% | (SE 1%) | 67% | (SE 4%) | 16% | (SE 3%) | |
| 84 days (12 weeks) | 100% | (SE 0%) | 69% | (SE 4%) | 29% | (SE 4%) | |
| 3 months |
| – | – |
| ( |
| ( |
| 98 days (14 weeks) | – | – | 79% | (SE 4%) | 53% | (SE 5%) | |
| 105 days (15 weeks) | – | – | 86% | (SE 3%) | 60% | (SE 5%) | |
| 112 days (16 weeks) | – | – | 93% | (SE 2%) | 66% | (SE 5%) | |
| 4 months |
| – | – |
| ( |
| ( |
| 126 days (18 weeks) | – | – | 97% | (SE 2%) | 85% | (SE 3%) | |
| 133 days (19 weeks) | – | – | 97% | (SE 2%) | 91% | (SE 3%) | |
| 140 days (20 weeks) | – | – | 98% | (SE 1%) | 93% | (SE 2%) | |
| 5 months |
| – | – |
| ( |
| ( |
| 154 days (22 weeks) | – | – | 98% | (SE 1%) | 97% | (SE 2%) | |
| 161 days (23 weeks) | – | – | 100% | (SE 0%) | 97% | (SE 2%) | |
| 168 days (24 weeks) | – | – | 97% | (SE 2%) | |||
| 6 months |
| – | – | – | – |
| ( |
| 182 days (26 weeks) | – | – | – | – | 98% | (SE 1%) | |
| 189 days (27 weeks) | – | – | – | – | 99% | (SE 1%) | |
| 196 days (28 weeks) | – | – | – | – | 100% | (SE 0%) | |
| Mean±SD |
|
|
| ||||
Return to sport according to injury severity
| Time landmarks | Grade IIB injuries (n=75) | Grade III injuries (n=35) | |||||||||||
| Return to on field rehabilitation | Return to train with team | Return to first match | Return to on field rehabilitation | Return to train with team | Return to first match | ||||||||
| 0 months |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14 days (2 weeks) | 0% | (SE 0%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 21 days (3 weeks) | 7% | (SE 3%) | 0% | (SE 0%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 28 days (4 weeks) | 28% | (SE 5%) | 1% | (SE 1%) | – | – | 0% | (SE 0%) | – | – | – | – | |
| 1 month |
|
| ( |
| ( | – | – |
| ( | – | – | – | – |
| 42 days (6 weeks) | 96% | (SE 2%) | 15% | (SE 4%) | 0% | (SE 0%) | 34% | (SE 8%) | – | – | – | – | |
| 49 days (7 weeks) | 99% | (SE 1%) | 29% | (SE 5%) | 1% | (SE 1%) | 57% | (SE 8%) | 0% | (SE 0%) | – | – | |
| 56 days (8 weeks) | 100% | (SE 0%) | 49% | (SE 6%) | 3% | (SE 2%) | 80% | (SE 7%) | 3% | (SE 3%) | – | – | |
| 2 months |
| – | – |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( |
| ( | – | – |
| 70 days (10 weeks) | – | – | 77% | (SE 5%) | 8% | (SE 3%) | 94% | (SE 4%) | 9% | (SE 5%) | – | – | |
| 77 days (11 weeks) | – | – | 95% | (SE 3%) | 23% | (SE 5%) | 97% | (SE 3%) | 9% | (SE 5%) | – | – | |
| 84 days (12 weeks) | – | – | 97% | (SE 2%) | 43% | (SE 6%) | 100% | (SE 0%) | 9% | (SE 5%) | 0% | (SE 0%) | |
| 3 months |
| – | – |
| ( |
| ( | – | – |
| ( |
| ( |
| 98 days (14 weeks) | – | – | – | – | 76% | (SE 5%) | – | – | 34% | (SE 8%) | 3% | (SE 3%) | |
| 105 days (15 weeks) | – | – | – | – | 84% | (SE 4%) | – | – | 54% | (SE 8%) | 9% | (SE 5%) | |
| 112 days (16 weeks) | – | – | – | – | 93% | (SE 3%) | – | – | 77% | (SE 7%) | 9% | (SE 5%) | |
| 4 months |
| – | – | – | – |
| ( | – | – |
| ( |
| ( |
| 126 days (18 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 91% | (SE 5%) | 51% | (SE 8%) | |
| 133 days (19 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 91% | (SE 5%) | 71% | (SE 8%) | |
| 140 days (20 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 94% | (SE 4%) | 77% | (SE 7%) | |
| 5 months |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| ( |
| ( |
| 154 days (22 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 94% | (SE 4%) | 91% | (SE 5%) | |
| 161 days (23 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100% | (SE 0%) | 91% | (SE 5%) | |
| 168 days (24 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 91% | (SE 5%) | |
| 6 months |
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| ( |
| 182 days (26 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 94% | (SE 4%) | |
| 189 days (27 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 97% | (SE 3%) | |
| 196 days (28 weeks) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100% | (SE 0%) | |
| Mean±SD |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Figure 3Graphic image on the time towards return to on field rehabilitation, training with team and first match.
Figure 4Graphic image on the specific characteristics of return to sports (overall, grade IIB, grade III).
Multiple regression models for return to sport outcomes
| Independent variables | Return to on field rehabilitation | Return to train with team | Return to first match | ||||||
| Coeff. | SE | P value | Coeff. | SE | P value | Coeff. | SE | P value | |
| (Constant) | 31.2 | 56.4 | 87.5 | ||||||
| Grade III injury | 15.7 | 1.8 | <0.0001 | 43.0 | 3.6 | <0.0001 | 43.8 | 3.8 | <0.0001 |
| Cartilage injury | 4.4 | 2.0 | =0.0277 | 10.7 | 4.0 | =0.0096 | 9.2 | 4.2 | =0.0311 |
| Age (years) | −0.4 | 0.2 | =0.0460 | −0.8 | 0.4 | =0.0475 | −1.1 | 0.4 | =0.0121 |
| Injury during training | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. |
| Reinjury | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. |
| Contact injury | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. |
| Dominant leg | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. | – | – | n.s. |
|
| p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | ||||||
|
| 8.0 | 16.3 | 16.9 | ||||||