Steve Sharman1, Kevin Butler2, Amanda Roberts3. 1. University of East London School of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, Stratford, London E15 4LZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ssharman@uel.ac.uk. 2. School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kbutler@lincoln.ac.uk. 3. School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: aroberts@lincoln.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gambling is a behaviour engaged in by millions of people worldwide; for some, gambling can become a severely maladaptive behaviour, and previous research has identified a wide range of psychosocial risk factors that can be considered important for the development and maintenance of disordered gambling. Although risk factors have been identified, the homogeneity of risk factors across specific groups thought to be vulnerable to disordered gambling is to date, unexplored. METHODS: To address this, the current review sought to conduct a systematic overview of literature relating to seven vulnerable groups: young people and adolescents, older adults, women, veterans, indigenous peoples, prisoners, and low socio-economic/income groups. RESULTS: Multiple risk factors associated with disordered gambling were identified; some appeared consistently across most groups, including being male, co-morbid mental and physical health conditions, substance use disorders, accessibility and availability of gambling, form and mode of gambling, and experience of trauma. Further risk factors were identified that were specific to each vulnerable group. CONCLUSION: Within the general population, certain groups are more vulnerable to disordered gambling. Although some risk factors are consistent across groups, some risk factors appear to be group specific. It is clear that there is no homogenous pathway in to disordered gambling, and that social, developmental, environmental and demographic characteristics can all interact to influence an individual's relationship with gambling.
BACKGROUND: Gambling is a behaviour engaged in by millions of people worldwide; for some, gambling can become a severely maladaptive behaviour, and previous research has identified a wide range of psychosocial risk factors that can be considered important for the development and maintenance of disordered gambling. Although risk factors have been identified, the homogeneity of risk factors across specific groups thought to be vulnerable to disordered gambling is to date, unexplored. METHODS: To address this, the current review sought to conduct a systematic overview of literature relating to seven vulnerable groups: young people and adolescents, older adults, women, veterans, indigenous peoples, prisoners, and low socio-economic/income groups. RESULTS: Multiple risk factors associated with disordered gambling were identified; some appeared consistently across most groups, including being male, co-morbid mental and physical health conditions, substance use disorders, accessibility and availability of gambling, form and mode of gambling, and experience of trauma. Further risk factors were identified that were specific to each vulnerable group. CONCLUSION: Within the general population, certain groups are more vulnerable to disordered gambling. Although some risk factors are consistent across groups, some risk factors appear to be group specific. It is clear that there is no homogenous pathway in to disordered gambling, and that social, developmental, environmental and demographic characteristics can all interact to influence an individual's relationship with gambling.
Authors: Henrietta Bowden-Jones; Roxanne W Hook; Jon E Grant; Konstantinos Ioannidis; Ornella Corazza; Naomi A Fineberg; Bryan F Singer; Amanda Roberts; Richard Bethlehem; Simon Dymond; Rafa Romero-Garcia; Trevor W Robbins; Samuele Cortese; Shane A Thomas; Barbara J Sahakian; Nicki A Dowling; Samuel R Chamberlain Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Tiina A Latvala; Tomi P Lintonen; Matthew Browne; Matthew Rockloff; Anne H Salonen Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 3.367