Literature DB >> 31473202

Best practices in mitigating the risk of biotin interference with laboratory testing.

Raffick Bowen1, Raul Benavides2, Jessica M Colón-Franco3, Brooke M Katzman4, Alagarraju Muthukumar5, Hossein Sadrzadeh6, Joely Straseski7, Ursula Klause8, Nam Tran9.   

Abstract

Dietary biotin intake does not typically result in blood biotin concentrations that exceed interference thresholds for in vitro diagnostic tests. However, recent trends of high-dose biotin supplements and clinical trials of very high biotin doses for patients with multiple sclerosis have increased concerns about biotin interference with immunoassays. Estimates of the prevalence of high biotin intake vary, and patients may be unaware that they are taking biotin. Since 2016, 92 cases of suspected biotin interference have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Immunoassays at greatest risk from biotin interference include thyroid and reproductive hormones, cardiac, and immunosuppressive drug tests. Several case studies have highlighted the challenge of biotin interference with thyroid hormone assays and the potential misdiagnosis of Graves' disease. Biotin interference should be suspected when immunoassay test results are inconsistent with clinical information; a clinically relevant biotin interference happens when the blood biotin concentration is high and the assay is sensitive to biotin. We propose a best practice workflow for laboratory scientists to evaluate discrepant immunoassay results, comprising: (1) serial dilution; (2) retesting after biotin clearance and/or repeat testing on an alternate platform; and (3) confirmation of the presence of biotin using depletion protocols or direct measurement of biotin concentrations. Efforts to increase awareness and avoid patient misdiagnosis should focus on improving guidance from manufacturers and educating patients, healthcare professionals, and laboratory staff. Best practice guidance for laboratory staff and healthcare professionals would also provide much-needed information on the prevention, detection, and management of biotin interference.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotin; Biotin interference; Biotin supplements; Immunoassay

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473202     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  8 in total

1.  Pseudo-hyperthyroidism: Biotin interference in a case with renal failure.

Authors:  M Demiral; Z K Kiraz; I O Alataş; N Cetin; B Kirel
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.877

2.  Osmotic Processor for Enabling Sensitive and Rapid Biomarker Detection via Lateral Flow Assays.

Authors:  Sheng-You Chen; Abe Y Wu; Ruby Lunde; James J Lai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  A Neonate with a Diagnosis of Pontocerebellar Hypoplasia Type 6 Treated with Biotin and Developed Biotin Interference with Laboratory Thyroid Function Tests.

Authors:  Motomichi Nagafuji; Daisuke Hitaka; Atsushi Iwabuchi; Yayoi Miyazono; Hidetoshi Takada
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-21

4.  Biotin Interference in Assays for Thyroid Hormones, Thyrotropin and Thyroglobulin.

Authors:  Dorina Ylli; Steven J Soldin; Brian Stolze; Bin Wei; Girum Nigussie; Hung Nguyen; Damodara Rao Mendu; Mihriye Mete; Di Wu; Cristiane J Gomes-Lima; Joanna Klubo-Gwiezdzinska; Kenneth D Burman; Leonard Wartofsky
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.506

Review 5.  The Effect of Vitamin Supplementation on Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients without Manifest Cardiovascular Diseases: Never-ending Hope or Underestimated Effect?

Authors:  Ovidiu Mitu; Ioana Alexandra Cirneala; Andrada Ioana Lupsan; Mircea Iurciuc; Ivona Mitu; Daniela Cristina Dimitriu; Alexandru Dan Costache; Antoniu Octavian Petris; Irina Iuliana Costache
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Tuberculosis and Other Airborne Microbes in Occupational Health and Safety.

Authors:  Esther Vaquero-Álvarez; Antonio Cubero-Atienza; Pilar Ruiz-Martínez; Manuel Vaquero-Abellán; María Dolores Redel-Macías; Pilar Aparicio-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Hormone Immunoassay Interference: A 2021 Update.

Authors:  Khaldoun Ghazal; Severine Brabant; Dominique Prie; Marie-Liesse Piketty
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  The biotin interference within interference suppressed immunoassays.

Authors:  Payam Kabiri; Ralf Weiskirchen; Josef van Helden
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.