Literature DB >> 31472301

Validation of the FRAiL model to predict non-vertebral and hip fractures in nursing home residents.

Sarah D Berry1, Andrew R Zullo2, Tingting Zhang3, Yoojin Lee3, Kevin W McConeghy2, Douglas P Kiel4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Tools were unavailable to assess fracture risk in nursing homes (NH); therefore, we developed the Fracture Risk Assessment in Long term care (FRAiL) model. The objective of this validation study was to assess the performance of the FRAiL model to predict 2-year risk of non-vertebral and hip fractures in a separate large cohort of NH residents.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included most long-stay NH residents in the United States (N = 896,840). Hip and non-vertebral fractures were identified using Medicare claims. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) was used to identify characteristics from the original FRAiL model. Multivariable competing risk regression was used to model risk of fracture.
RESULTS: Mean age was 83.8 years (±8.2 years) and 70.7% were women. Over a mean follow-up of 1.52 years (SD 0.65), 41,531 residents (4.6%) were hospitalized with non-vertebral fracture (n = 30,356 hip fractures). In the fully adjusted model, 14/15 model characteristics remained significant predictors of non-vertebral fracture. Female sex (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.52, 1.59), wandering (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.26, 1.34), and falls (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.26, 1.31) were strongly associated with non-vertebral fracture rate. Total dependence in ADLs (versus independence) was associated with a decrease in non-vertebral fracture rate (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.52, 0.64). Discrimination was moderate in men (C-index = 0.68 for hip, 0.66 for non-vertebral) and women (C-index = 0.68 for hip, 0.65 for non-vertebral), and calibration was excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model comprised entirely from routinely collected data was able to identify NH residents at greatest risk for non-vertebral fracture.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip fracture; Non-vertebral fracture; Nursing home; Prediction model; Risk factors

Year:  2019        PMID: 31472301      PMCID: PMC6823926          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  20 in total

1.  Comparing methods to identify hip fracture in a nursing home population using Medicare claims.

Authors:  S K Rigler; E Ellerbeck; J Whittle; J Mahnken; G Cook-Wiens; T I Shireman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults.

Authors:  Sarah D Berry; Long Ngo; Elizabeth J Samelson; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Defining hip fracture with claims data: outpatient and provider claims matter.

Authors:  S D Berry; A R Zullo; K McConeghy; Y Lee; L Daiello; D P Kiel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Recovery of function following a hip fracture in geriatric ambulatory persons living in nursing homes: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lauren A Beaupre; C Allyson Jones; D William C Johnston; Donna M Wilson; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Predicting fractures using bone mineral density: a prospective study of long-term care residents.

Authors:  K E Broe; M T Hannan; D K Kiely; C M Cali; L A Cupples; D P Kiel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Low bone mineral density and risk of fracture in white female nursing home residents.

Authors:  J M Chandler; S I Zimmerman; C J Girman; A R Martin; W Hawkes; J R Hebel; P D Sloane; L Holder; J Magaziner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Outcome in ambulatory status immediately following hip fracture surgery in the acute setting: a comparison of nursing home residents and community older adults.

Authors:  T S Dharmarajan; H Tankala; B Patel; M Sipalay; E P Norkus
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Administrative health data: guilty until proven innocent. Response to comments by Levy and Sobolev.

Authors:  S D Berry; A R Zullo; K McConeghy; Y Lee; L Daiello; D P Kiel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Non-hip, non-spine fractures drive healthcare utilization following a fracture: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  G Ioannidis; J Flahive; L Pickard; A Papaioannou; R D Chapurlat; K G Saag; S Silverman; F A Anderson; S H Gehlbach; F H Hooven; S Boonen; J E Compston; C Cooper; A Díez-Perez; S L Greenspan; A Z Lacroix; R Lindsay; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; P N Sambrook; E S Siris; N B Watts; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Validation of a one year fracture prediction tool for absolute hip fracture risk in long term care residents.

Authors:  Ahmed M Negm; George Ioannidis; Micaela Jantzi; Jenn Bucek; Lora Giangregorio; Laura Pickard; John P Hirdes; Jonathan D Adachi; Julie Richardson; Lehana Thabane; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving shared decision-making for osteoporosis pharmacologic therapy in nursing homes: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Emily J Hecker; Eleanor McConnell; Laurie Herndon; Milta Little; Tingzhong Xue; Sarah Berry
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.879

2.  The Effect of Fall Biomechanics on Risk for Hip Fracture in Older Adults: A Cohort Study of Video-Captured Falls in Long-Term Care.

Authors:  Yijian Yang; Vicki Komisar; Nataliya Shishov; Bryan Lo; Alexandra Mb Korall; Fabio Feldman; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.741

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.