Literature DB >> 31472087

Comparative assessment of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge preservation with and without adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivative: A randomized clinical trial.

Jae-Hong Lee1, Do-Hyung Kim1, Seong-Nyum Jeong1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized, controlled, parallel-arm study was to evaluate the (a) radiographic bone dimensional changes, (b) postoperative discomfort, and (c) early soft tissue wound healing outcomes, following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth (central and lateral incisors) and treatment with alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) with and without the adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD).
METHODS: Thirty extraction sockets were randomly assigned to two groups: deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen covered with collagen membrane with the adjunctive use of EMD (test group) and without EMD (control group). Bone dimensional changes were measured using cone beam computed tomography at 3 and 5 months after ARP. The severity and duration of pain and swelling were evaluated using self-reported questionnaires, and soft tissue wound healing outcomes were assessed clinically. Chi-square tests and t tests were conducted to compare differences between the two groups.
RESULTS: Radiographic and clinical analyses showed no significant differences in horizontal and vertical bone dimensional changes and soft tissue wound healing outcomes (including spontaneous bleeding, persistent swelling, and ulceration) between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the severity of pain and swelling between the two groups, but the durations of pain (difference [df] = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.33-2.06; p = .008) and swelling (df = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.11-2.01; p = .029) were significantly reduced in the test group.
CONCLUSION: Alveolar ridge preservation with the adjunctive use of EMD reduced the durations of postoperative pain and swelling following maxillary anterior teeth extraction.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regeneration; enamel matrix derivatives; randomized controlled trial; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31472087     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  4 in total

1.  The Effect of Coenzyme Q10/Collagen Hydrogel on Bone Regeneration in Extraction Socket Prior to Implant Placement in Type II Diabetic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mostafa Ghanem; Lamia Heikal; Hagar Abdel Fattah; Adham El Ashwah; Riham Fliefel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26

3.  Efficacy and safety of rhBMP/β-TCP in alveolar ridge preservation: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, investigator-blinded clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeong Joon Han; Ah Ryum Chang; Jaemyung Ahn; Seunggon Jung; Jongrak Hong; Hee-Kyun Oh; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 4.  Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Julie Vitenson; Daniel Deluiz; Kimie Bols Østergaard; Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2022-03-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.