Literature DB >> 31471989

Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

N Baiju1, G Acharya2,3, F D'Antonio2, R C Berg1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For many women, the need for multiple clinical visits is a barrier to medical abortion.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home versus routine clinic follow up after medical abortion. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to find studies published in 1991-2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies included women of reproductive age who had undergone a medical abortion that was completed at home. The intervention and self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion done by urine pregnancy tests kits by women at home was compared with routine medical follow up at a clinic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers completed the study selection, data extraction, critical appraisal, and assessment of the evidence. The outcomes were successful complete abortions, side effects and complications, and acceptability. We performed meta-analyses when possible and GRADE to ascertain the certainty of the evidence. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017055316). MAIN
RESULTS: Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n = 5493) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis from all studies showed no significant difference in complete abortion rates between self-assessment and routine clinic follow up: RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01. The ongoing pregnancy rates were similar and the pooled results for the safety outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. There was a significantly greater preference for self-assessment as the follow-up method.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home are not inferior to routine clinic follow up. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion are not inferior to routine clinic follow up.
© 2019 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; home; pregnancy test; self-assessment; systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31471989     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  4 in total

Review 1.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Kunyan Zhou; Dan Shan; Xiaoyan Luo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Ara Aiken; P A Lohr; J Lord; N Ghosh; J Starling
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 7.331

3.  Chemical Fingerprint Analysis and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics Study of the Protective Effect of Buxue Yimu Granule in Medical-Induced Incomplete Abortion Rats.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Wei Li; Ting-Ting Chen; Yong Yang; Meng-Yao Wu; Jie-Ying Luo; Yun Gong; Liang Zou
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Self-testing for pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Ping Teresa Yeh; Karima Gholbzouri; Manjulaa Narasimhan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.