You La Jeon1, So Young Kang2, Woo-In Lee1, Myeong Hee Kim1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University and Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University and Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea sykangmd@daum.net.
Abstract
GOALS: The existence of anti-dense fine speckled (DFS) 70 autoantibodies are considered an exclusionary biomarker for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Several tests to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies have been introduced, and the use of them in specimens with a DFS pattern in indirect immunofluorescence-antinuclear antibody (IIF-ANA) testing has been suggested. However, these additional tests have only been evaluated in a small number of samples; their clinical usefulness therefore requires further evaluation. METHODS: A total of 213 serum specimens showing DFS (n=155) or homogeneous (H; n=58) patterns were included. All specimens were tested by western blotting (WB) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Clinical information regarding SARDs was analyzed. RESULTS: The detection rates for WB and EIA for anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in specimens with a DFS pattern were 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. Detection rates in specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer were significantly lower than those in specimens with a high titer. The detection rate of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in 58 specimens with an H pattern was 10.3% (6/58). Among 155 subjects with a DFS pattern in IIF-ANA staining, only five were diagnosed with SARD. CONCLUSIONS: There is little need to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies using other methods. When a DFS pattern is observed in IIF-ANA staining, it is more important to confirm the presence of other autoantibodies related to SARDs than to identify anti-DFS70 autoantibodies. Finally, more careful interpretation of IIF-ANA to specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer is needed.
GOALS: The existence of anti-dense fine speckled (DFS) 70 autoantibodies are considered an exclusionary biomarker for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Several tests to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies have been introduced, and the use of them in specimens with a DFS pattern in indirect immunofluorescence-antinuclear antibody (IIF-ANA) testing has been suggested. However, these additional tests have only been evaluated in a small number of samples; their clinical usefulness therefore requires further evaluation. METHODS: A total of 213 serum specimens showing DFS (n=155) or homogeneous (H; n=58) patterns were included. All specimens were tested by western blotting (WB) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Clinical information regarding SARDs was analyzed. RESULTS: The detection rates for WB and EIA for anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in specimens with a DFS pattern were 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. Detection rates in specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer were significantly lower than those in specimens with a high titer. The detection rate of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in 58 specimens with an H pattern was 10.3% (6/58). Among 155 subjects with a DFS pattern in IIF-ANA staining, only five were diagnosed with SARD. CONCLUSIONS: There is little need to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies using other methods. When a DFS pattern is observed in IIF-ANA staining, it is more important to confirm the presence of other autoantibodies related to SARDs than to identify anti-DFS70 autoantibodies. Finally, more careful interpretation of IIF-ANA to specimens with a low IIF-ANA titer is needed.