Marc T Pisansky1, Emilia M Lefevre1, Cassandra L Retzlaff1, Brian H Trieu2, David W Leipold1, Patrick E Rothwell3. 1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. Graduate Program in Neuroscience and Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: rothwell@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The nucleus accumbens (NAc) controls multiple facets of impulsivity but is a heterogeneous brain region with diverse microcircuitry. Prior literature links impulsive behavior in rodents to gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling in the NAc. Here, we studied the regulation of impulsive behavior by fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs), a strong source of gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated synaptic inhibition in the NAc. METHODS: Male and female transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase in FSIs allowed us to identify these sparsely distributed cells in the NAc. We used a 5-choice serial reaction time task to measure both impulsive action and sustained attention. During the 5-choice serial reaction time task, we monitored FSI activity with fiber photometry calcium imaging and manipulated FSI activity with chemogenetic and optogenetic methodology. We used electrophysiology, optogenetics, and fluorescent in situ hybridization to confirm these methods were robust and specific to FSIs. RESULTS: In mice performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task, NAc FSIs showed sustained activity on trials ending with correct responses, but FSI activity declined over time on trials ending with premature responses. The number of premature responses increased significantly after sustained chemogenetic inhibition or temporally delimited optogenetic inhibition of NAc FSIs, without any changes in response latencies or general locomotor activity. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments provide strong evidence that NAc FSIs constrain impulsive actions, most likely through gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated synaptic inhibition of medium spiny projection neurons. Our findings may provide insight into the pathophysiology of disorders associated with impulsivity and may inform the development of circuit-based therapeutic interventions.
BACKGROUND: The nucleus accumbens (NAc) controls multiple facets of impulsivity but is a heterogeneous brain region with diverse microcircuitry. Prior literature links impulsive behavior in rodents to gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling in the NAc. Here, we studied the regulation of impulsive behavior by fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs), a strong source of gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated synaptic inhibition in the NAc. METHODS: Male and female transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase in FSIs allowed us to identify these sparsely distributed cells in the NAc. We used a 5-choice serial reaction time task to measure both impulsive action and sustained attention. During the 5-choice serial reaction time task, we monitored FSI activity with fiber photometry calcium imaging and manipulated FSI activity with chemogenetic and optogenetic methodology. We used electrophysiology, optogenetics, and fluorescent in situ hybridization to confirm these methods were robust and specific to FSIs. RESULTS: In mice performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task, NAc FSIs showed sustained activity on trials ending with correct responses, but FSI activity declined over time on trials ending with premature responses. The number of premature responses increased significantly after sustained chemogenetic inhibition or temporally delimited optogenetic inhibition of NAc FSIs, without any changes in response latencies or general locomotor activity. CONCLUSIONS: These experiments provide strong evidence that NAc FSIs constrain impulsive actions, most likely through gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated synaptic inhibition of medium spiny projection neurons. Our findings may provide insight into the pathophysiology of disorders associated with impulsivity and may inform the development of circuit-based therapeutic interventions.
Authors: Kyuhyun Choi; Elizabeth N Holly; M Felicia Davatolhagh; Kevin T Beier; Marc V Fuccillo Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Aryn H Gittis; Giao B Hang; Eva S LaDow; Liza R Shoenfeld; Bassam V Atallah; Steven Finkbeiner; Anatol C Kreitzer Journal: Neuron Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Talia N Lerner; Carrie Shilyansky; Thomas J Davidson; Kathryn E Evans; Kevin T Beier; Kelly A Zalocusky; Ailey K Crow; Robert C Malenka; Liqun Luo; Raju Tomer; Karl Deisseroth Journal: Cell Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Oakleigh M Folkes; Rita Báldi; Veronika Kondev; David J Marcus; Nolan D Hartley; Brandon D Turner; Jade K Ayers; Jordan J Baechle; Maya P Misra; Megan Altemus; Carrie A Grueter; Brad A Grueter; Sachin Patel Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Kevin M Manz; Benjamin C Coleman; Alexis N Jameson; Dipanwita G Ghose; Sachin Patel; Brad A Grueter Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Richard B Crouse; Kristen Kim; Hannah M Batchelor; Eric M Girardi; Rufina Kamaletdinova; Justin Chan; Prithviraj Rajebhosale; Steven T Pittenger; Lorna W Role; David A Talmage; Miao Jing; Yulong Li; Xiao-Bing Gao; Yann S Mineur; Marina R Picciotto Journal: Elife Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Kevin M Manz; Benjamin C Coleman; Carrie A Grueter; Brenda C Shields; Michael R Tadross; Brad A Grueter Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 6.167