Literature DB >> 31469859

Toxicity of locoregional radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer (TOLERAB): Final long-term evaluation.

Alice Clément-Zhao1, Marie-Laure Tanguy2, Paul Cottu3, Brigitte De La Lande4, Patrick Bontemps5, Claire Lemanski6, Pierre Baumann7, Alexia Savignoni2, Christelle Levy8, Karine Peignaux9, Agnès Reynaud-Bougnoux10, Aline Gobillion2, Youlia Kirova1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Few data are available concerning the safety of bevacizumab (B) in combination with locoregional radiation therapy (RT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the 5-year late toxicity of concurrent B and RT in non-metastatic breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentre prospective study included non-metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in phase 3 clinical trials evaluating B with concurrent RT versus RT alone. All patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and normofractionated breast or chest wall RT, with or without regional lymph node RT. B was administered at an equivalent dose of 5 mg/kg once a week for 1 year. The safety profile was evaluated 1, 3 and 5 years after completion of radiotherapy.
RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included between November 2007 and April 2010. Median follow-up was 60 months (12-73) and 5-year late toxicity data were available for 46 patients. The majority of tumours were triple-negative (68.8%), tumour size <2cm (41.3%) with negative nodal status (50.8%). Median total dose of B was 15,000mg and median duration was 11.2 months. No grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. Only 8 patients experienced grade 1-2 toxicities: n = 3 (6.5%) grade 1 lymphedema, n = 2 (4.3%) grade 1 pain, n = 1 (2.2%) grade 2 lymphedema, n = 1 (2.2%) grade 1 fibrosis. Five-year overall survival was 93.8%, disease-free survival was 89% and locoregional recurrence-free survival was 93.1%.
CONCLUSION: Concurrent B and locoregional RT are associated with acceptable 5-year toxicity in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. No grade ≥3 toxicity was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31469859      PMCID: PMC6716668          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Neoangiogenesis plays a central role in tumour growth and metastasis, with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)[1] acting as a key growth factor in breast tumours. Bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech Pharmaceuticals, San Francisco, CA) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting circulating VEGF. Encouraging results have been reported with the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy in metastatic breast tumours[2]. Four clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the potential benefit of the combination of bevacizumab with standard neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy in non-metastatic breast cancer. BEVERLY-1 trial (NCT00820547)[3] is a phase 2 study designed to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer without HER2 overexpression BEVERLY-2 trial (NCT00717405)[4] is a phase 2 study designed to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab in patients with non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer with HER2 overexpression BEATRICE trial (NCT00528567)[5,6] is a phase 3 study designed to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer BETH trial (NCT00625898)[7] is a phase 3 study designed to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab with adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer with HER2 overexpression Despite the encouraging results of preliminary studies concerning the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer[2], no clinical benefit was observed in these trials[3,5,7]. Only limited data are available concerning the safety of the combination of bevacizumab and locoregional radiotherapy, with heterogeneous results: toxicity has been described in phase I and II trials in lung cancer and pancreatic cancer[8-10], although this combination was well tolerated by patients with cervical cancer and pancreatic cancer in another phase II trial[11,12]. In the BEVERLY-1, BEVERLY-2, BEATRICE and BETH trials, bevacizumab was administered concurrently with locoregional radiotherapy. To evaluate the safety of this combination, patients treated in France in these trials and randomized in the bevacizumab arm were enrolled in the TOLERAB (Toxicities of Locoregional Radiotherapy Associated with Bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer) study. The final long-term (5 years) of toxicity results are presented here. Acute, one-year and three-year toxicity results have been previously published[13-15].

Materials and methods

Patients

TOLERAB, the French multicentre non-interventional single-arm observational cohort, included non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated by concurrent bevacizumab with local or locoregional radiotherapy. Patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in the BEVERLY 1, BEVERLY 2, BEATRICE or BETH trials [3-7]. Exclusion criteria were bilateral breast cancer, history of another cancer, medical conditions preventing the administration of bevacizumab, impossibility to attend long-term follow-up and inability to provide informed consent. All patients were informed about the study and they provide written consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Hesinki declaration. According to French legislation, the study and the consent procedures were approved by two national independant committe: the « Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l’Information en matière de Recherche dans le domaine de la Santé » (CCTIRS) and the « Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés » (CNIL).

Treatment

All patients received neoadjuvant (in BEVERLY 1 and BEVERLY 2 trials) or adjuvant chemotherapy (in BEATRICE and BETH trials), in combination with trastuzumab in the case of histologically confirmed HER2-positive status. Bevacizumab was administered with concurrent radiotherapy at an equivalent dose of 5 mg/kg every week intravenously (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) for 1 year. In BEVERLY 1[3] and BEVERLY 2[4] trials, patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for eight injections in the neoadjuvant phase. Bevacizumab was stopped at least 4 weeks before surgery and restarted during or after radiotherapy, once the wound was healed entirely. Adjuvant bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was given for ten injections. In BETH trial[7], patients received locoregional adjuvant radiotherapy after completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was started with adjuvant chemotherapy and continued it for a total duration of 1 year following first bevacizumab dose, without stop during radiotherapy. In BEATRICE trial[5,6], patients received locoregional adjuvant radiotherapy either before or after completing adjuvant chemotherapy, as per local guidelines. Patients started bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with adjuvant chemotherapy and continued it for a total duration of 1 year, without stop during radiotherapy. Radiotherapy clinical target volumes included breast or chest wall, with or without regional lymph nodes. Volumes and fractionation were chosen in accordance with local practice and were already described in the 3-years and 1-year previous report [14-15].

Endpoints

The primary endpoint was the safety of the concurrent combination of bevacizumab with radiotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer. Acute toxicity was assessed in terms of radiation dermatitis and oesophagitis. Late toxicity was assessed at 12, 36 and 60 months according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Cases of pain, fibrosis, telangiectasia, lymphoedema, ulceration, myocardial infarction, pericarditis, dyspnoea, dysphagia and paresis were collected. Secondary endpoints were the cosmetic results (according to the classification of Harris and al. [16]) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Evaluation tools

The baseline evaluation comprised recording of medical history, WHO performance status, physical examination and a laboratory work-up. For the study, patients were evaluated by the radiation oncologist once a week during radiotherapy, 4 weeks after completion of radiotherapy and one, three and five years after treatment. Additionally, they also had a normal post-treatment follow-up at least every 6 months.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were described by frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were described by their means and/or medians with variances and/or ranges. Survival estimates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. All analyses were performed with R version 3.4.2 software.

Results

Patient characteristics

From November 2007 to April 2010, 64 patients received concurrent bevacizumab concurrently with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. All patients received adjuvant bevacizumab, 24 patients received neoadjuvant and adjuvant bevacizumab (corresponding to patients included in BEVERLY 1 or BEVERLY 2 trials). Patients characteristics were already described in the 3-years previous report [15] and are shown in Table 1. Median age was 52.9 years (range: 23–68 years) and 60.9% of cases had cancer of the left breast. The most common histological type was invasive ductal carcinoma (89.1%) and the histological grade was III in 78.1% of cases. Hormonal receptors were positive in 18.8% of patients, HER2 receptor was overexpressed in 23.4% of cases and 68.8% of patients had triple-negative breast cancer. Median follow-up was 59.9 months (range: 12–73 months), the first quartile is 57.2 months, the third quartile is 62.3 months. Concerning the 18 patients without 5-year late toxicity data, nine of them died before 5 years and nine were lost to follow-up.
Table 1

Patient characteristics.

N (n = 64)%
Menopause3859.4
Cardiovascular risk factor
Obesity (BMI>30)1320.3
Hypertension1015.6
Smoking69.4
Diabetes23.1
Deep arterial or venous thrombosis11.6
Hyperlipideamia34.7
Age (years) Median [range]52.9 [23–68]
Side
Left breast3960.9
Right breast2539.1
Histology
Invasive ductal5789.1
Invasive lobular46.2
Others34.7
Clinical T stage
T023.1
T12437.5
T21421.9
T300
T42335.9
Tx00
Missing data11.6
Clinical N stage
N03250
N12437.5
N246.2
N334.7
Nx00
Missing data11.6
UICC stage
Stage I1929.7
Stage IIA1726.6
Stage IIB46.2
Stage IIIA00
Stage IIIB2335.9
Missing data11.6
Histological grade
I23.1
II1117.2
III5078.1
Anaplastic11.6
Hormone receptor status
HR+1218.8
HR-5281.3
HER2 overexpression1523.4
Triple-negative breast cancer4468.8

Treatment characteristics

Surgery

Surgery consisted of total mastectomy for 44.4% of patients and breast conserving surgery for 55.6% of patients, with sentinel lymph node dissection in 32.8% of patients and axillary lymph node dissection in 82.8% of cases. The indication for axillary lymph node dissection was chosen in accordance with local practice. Surgery was performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 37.5% of patients.

Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy was given with conventional fractionation for 45 patients and 19 patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy (from 2.13Gy per fraction to 2.66Gy per fraction). Radiotherapy characteristics are shown in Table 2. Whole breast alone was treated in 56.3% of cases at a median dose of 50Gy and with a median tumour boost dose of 16Gy. Chest wall radiotherapy was treated in 43.7% of cases at a median dose of 49Gy. Lymph nodes radiotherapy was performed in 43 patients (67.2%) with supraclavicular and infraclavicular nodes, internal mammary nodes and axillary nodes in respectively 95.5%, 58.1% and 4.7% of the cases.
Table 2

Radiotherapy characteristics.

N (n = 64)%
BREAST RADIOTHERAPY3656.3
Median dose (Gy), [range]50 [40–58]
Dose per fraction
≤ 2Gy2775
> 2Gy925
Irradiation technique
Dorsal decubitus3083.3
Lateral decubitus513.9
Missing data12.8
Type of radiation
Photons3392
Cobalt13
Missing data25
BOOST3656.3
Median dose (Gy), [range]16 [10–18]
Type of radiation
Photons2055.5
Electrons1027.7
Photons and electrons513.8
Missing data13
CHEST WALL RADIOTHERAPY2843.7
Median dose (Gy), [range]49 [40–54]
Dose per fraction
≤ 2Gy1864.3
> 2Gy1035.7
Type of radiation
Photons1450
Electrons1139.3
Photons and electrons310.7
LYMPH NODES RADIOTHERAPY4367.2
Supraclavicular nodes4195.4
Internal mammary nodes2558.1
Axillary nodes24.7

Systemic treatment

Median duration of bevacizumab was 11.7 months with median total dose of 15000mg (range 960–28080). Administration schedule was every three weeks for 91% of patients. Systemic treatment characteristics are shown in Table 3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 37.5% of patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 63.5% of patients, comprising anthracycline and/or taxanes. Patients with HER2-overexpression received trastuzumab (23.4%) and hormonal therapy was administered to 14.1% of patients.
Table 3

Systemics treatments.

N (n = 64)%
NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY2437.5
Sequential combination of taxanes and anthracyclines24
ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY4062.5
Anthracycline-based chemotherapy only3
Taxane-based chemotherapy only3
Sequential combination of taxanes and anthracyclines34
TRASTUZUMAB1523.4
Median dose, mg [range]7164 [3300–8370]
Median duration, months [range]12.17 [3.78–13.24]
HORMONTAL THERAPY914.1
Tamoxifen5
Aromatase inhibitor4
BEVACIZUMAB64100
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant24
Adjuvant only40
Neoadjuvant only0
Median dose, mg [range]15000 [960–28080]
Median duration, months [range]11.7 [2.1–15.3]

5-year toxicities

Forty-six patients (71.9%) were evaluated at 5 years. Only 8 patients reported late toxicity. The most common toxicities were grade 1 lymphoedema (n = 3, 6.5%) and grade 1 pain (n = 2, 4.3%). One patient experienced grade 1 fibrosis and one patient experienced grade 2 lymphoedema. No grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. These symptoms are in most cases related to the more aggressive surgery: total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection for the four patients with lymphoedema, breast conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection for the two patients with pain and for the patient with fibrosis. No myocardial infarction, no pericarditis and no dyspnoea were reported. Details of the 5-year toxicities are shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Five-years toxicities.

N (n = 64)%
5-YEARS TOXICITY EVALUATION
Yes4671.9
No1828.1
5-YEARS TOXICITY
Yes817.4
No3882.6
Pain
Grade 124.3
Grade 200
Grade >200
Fibrosis
Grade 112.2
Grade 200
Grade >200
Telangiectasia
Grade 100
Grade 200
Grade >200
Lymphoedema
Grade 136.5
Grade 212.2
Grade >200
Ulceration
Grade 100
Grade 200
Grade >200
Myocardial infarction
Grade 100
Grade 200
Grade >200
Pericarditis
Grade 100
Grade 200
Grade >200
Dyspnea
Grade 100
Grade 200
Grade >200
Dysphagia
Grade 100
Grade 200
Grade >200
Paresis
Grade 100
Grade 200
Grade >200
Other12.2
LVEF evaluation at 5 years was available for 24 patients (37.5%) and only one patient had an LVEF value less than 50%. Among the 35 patients treated by breast-conserving surgery, 12 were evaluated for cosmetic results and only one patient reported a cosmetic modification (grade 1).

Patient outcomes

Five-year overall survival, progression-free survival and distant progression-free survival were 90.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 83–98%), 90.4% (83–98%) and 90% (85–95%), respectively.

Discussion

This French observational study, based on prospective data from the main trials evaluating adjuvant or neoadjuvant bevacizumab therapy for non-metastatic breast cancer, describes acceptable 5-year toxicities of the combination of bevacizumab and locoregional radiotherapy with no grade ≥3 toxicity. This is the largest published study with the longest follow-up reporting the late toxicity of the combination of bevacizumab and locoregional radiotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer. At 5 years, only 17.4% of patients evaluated (n = 8/46) reported toxicity, all grade 1–2 and the most common toxicities were lymphoedema and pain. More toxicities were reported at 3 years in the same cohort,[15],: grade 1 (mainly lymphoedema and pain) for 39.5% of patients evaluated (n = 18/43) and only one patient experienced grade 3 lymphoedema. A favourable outcome in terms of acute toxicity has been previously reported [14,17]. A limitation of this study is the high rate of missing data for LVEF and it is consistent with a previously French study[18]. One explanation could be the small proportion of patients treated by trastuzumab and therefore not requiring regular cardiological screening. However, the lack of LVEF evaluation may be compensated by the report of myocardial infarction, pericarditis and dyspnoea. Five-years toxicites were available for 46 patients (71.9% of patients) and none of them reported these cardio-pulmonary toxicities. Although there is a rationale for use of concurrent bevacizumab and radiotherapy (inhibition of VEGF leads to transient normalization of tumour oxygenation, minimizing hypoxia and consequently inducing decreased radiation sensitivity [19]), few data are available concerning the late toxicity of this combination, with heterogeneous results. A high rate of grade 2–3 toxicities was observed for high-risk prostate cancer [20], which may have been worsened by bevacizumab, with a median follow-up of 34 months. For non-small cell lung cancer, major oesophageal toxicities were reported in the first year [8,21] and late toxicity was therefore not investigated. In a phase 3 trial in glioblastoma [22], more grade ≥3 toxicities were observed with bevacizumab than without bevacizumab, with a median follow-up of 12.3 months. In contrast, a phase 2 trial in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma [23] reported 20% of grade 1–2 treatment-related haemorrhage and no grade 4–5 late toxicity, with a median follow-up of 30 months, and concluded that this treatment is feasible. A phase 2 trial in advanced cervical carcinoma [11] also indicated the feasibility of this treatment with no treatment-related serious adverse events, with a median follow-up of 12.4 months. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the favourable 5-year safety profile of the combination of bevacizumab and radiation therapy. Recent phase II and III trials [3,5,7] have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit of adding bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy in non-,metastatic breast cancer but longer follow-up and correlative studies to identify patients who might benefit from bevacizumab are needed. In the metastatic setting, initial therapy with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab provided significant improvement of progression-free survival [2,24], but no study has shown any OS benefit [25,26]. Moreover, numerous retrospective studies have demonstrate the benefit of treating the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer patients, particularly by means of radiation therapy [27]. In daily clinical practice, radiation oncologist are often in the position to evaluate whether it is safe for the patient to add radiotherapy to the ongoing treatment with bevacizumab. Our study could help to this decision.

Conclusion

In conclusion, concurrent bevacizumab and locoregional radiation therapy for breast cancer did not induce any severe late toxicity at five years.
  26 in total

1.  Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  J R Harris; M B Levene; G Svensson; S Hellman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Evaluation of acute locoregional toxicity in patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab.

Authors:  Sharad Goyal; Malay S Rao; Atif Khan; Lien Huzzy; Camille Green; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Phase II trial of full-dose gemcitabine and bevacizumab in combination with attenuated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  William Small; Mary F Mulcahy; Alfred Rademaker; David J Bentrem; Al B Benson; Bing Bing Weitner; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Phase I trial evaluating the safety of bevacizumab with concurrent radiotherapy and capecitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Christopher H Crane; Lee M Ellis; James L Abbruzzese; Christina Amos; Henry Q Xiong; Linus Ho; Douglas B Evans; Eric P Tamm; Chaan Ng; Peter W T Pisters; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Marc E Delclos; Michael O'Reilly; Jeffrey E Lee; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RTOG 0615): a phase 2 multi-institutional trial.

Authors:  Nancy Y Lee; Qiang Zhang; David G Pfister; John Kim; Adam S Garden; James Mechalakos; Kenneth Hu; Quynh T Le; A Dimitrios Colevas; Bonnie S Glisson; Anthony Tc Chan; K Kian Ang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Tracheoesophageal fistula formation in patients with lung cancer treated with chemoradiation and bevacizumab.

Authors:  David R Spigel; John D Hainsworth; Denise A Yardley; Eric Raefsky; Jeffrey Patton; Nancy Peacock; Cindy Farley; Howard A Burris; F Anthony Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathy Miller; Molin Wang; Julie Gralow; Maura Dickler; Melody Cobleigh; Edith A Perez; Tamara Shenkier; David Cella; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Phase II study of bevacizumab with concurrent capecitabine and radiation followed by maintenance gemcitabine and bevacizumab for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG 0411.

Authors:  Christopher H Crane; Kathryn Winter; William F Regine; Howard Safran; Tyvin A Rich; Walter Curran; Robert A Wolff; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Breast cancer with synchronous metastases: survival impact of exclusive locoregional radiotherapy.

Authors:  Romuald Le Scodan; Denise Stevens; Etienne Brain; Jean Louis Floiras; Christine Cohen-Solal; Brigitte De La Lande; Michelle Tubiana-Hulin; Sameh Yacoub; Maya Gutierrez; David Ali; Miriam Gardner; Patricia Moisson; Sylviane Villette; Florence Lerebours; Jean Nicolas Munck; Alain Labib
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Scheduling of radiation with angiogenesis inhibitors anginex and Avastin improves therapeutic outcome via vessel normalization.

Authors:  Ruud P M Dings; Melissa Loren; Hanke Heun; Elizabeth McNiel; Arjan W Griffioen; Kevin H Mayo; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Combination of Modern Radiotherapy and New Targeted Treatments for Breast Cancer Management.

Authors:  Arnaud Beddok; Paul Cottu; Alain Fourquet; Youlia Kirova
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.