Literature DB >> 31469764

Intrasession and Intersession Reliability of Countermovement Jump Testing in Division-I Volleyball Athletes.

Kevin M Carroll1, John P Wagle1, Christopher J Sole2, Michael H Stone1.   

Abstract

Carroll, KM, Wagle, JP, Sole, CJ, and Stone, MH. Intrasession and intersession reliability of countermovement jump testing in Division-I volleyball athletes. J Strength Cond Res 33(11): 2932-2935, 2019-The countermovement jump (CMJ) is a reliable and noninvasive test of lower-body neuromuscular performance. Many of the investigations used to establish the reliability of CMJ have been conducted in a controlled environment (i.e., laboratory setting). To better inform coaches, reliability of key CMJ variables should be examined in a practical environment. This study assessed intrasession and intersession reliability of CMJ variables in NCAA D-I volleyball athletes. Eleven female volleyball players (age = 19.8 ± 0.8 years, height = 1.75 ± 0.07 m, body mass = 71.6 ± 8.9 kg) performed twice weekly CMJ testing on force platforms across 14 weeks of training. Dependent variables were CMJ height (CMJH), reactive strength index modified (RSIMOD), relative peak power (rPP), and countermovement depth (CM depth). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), coefficient of variation (CV), and typical error (TE) were calculated, along with Pearson correlation coefficients. Intrasession reliability revealed excellent reliability values for CMJH (ICC = 0.94, CV = 2.9 ± 2.4%, TE = 1.25) and RSIMOD (ICC = 0.93, CV = 4.7 ± 4.9, TE = 0.03). Good reliability values were observed for rPP (ICC = 0.79, CV = 6.1 ± 10.9%, TE = 4.48), with only moderate reliability for CM depth (ICC = 0.61, CV = 7.1 ± 10.9%, TE = 16.9). Intersession reliability indicated excellent reliability for CMJH (ICC = 0.92, CV = 3.2 ± 2.8%, TE = 1.4) and RSIMOD (ICC = 0.92, CV = 5.4 ± 4.3%, TE = 0.03). However, poor reliability was observed for rPP (ICC = 0.41, CV = 10.4 ± 15.4%, TE = 7.95) and CM depth (ICC = 0.39, CV = 7.7 ± 10.8%, TE = 6.42). These results suggest that in the context of weekly athlete monitoring, measures such as CMJH and RSIMOD exhibit the greatest reliability. Conversely, measures such as CM depth and rPP exhibit high levels of variability. Practitioners seeking to track jump performance over time should be cognizant of CM depth variability and its potential impact on CMJ variables.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31469764     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Reliability and Validity of the Polar V800 Sports Watch for Estimating Vertical Jump Height.

Authors:  Manuel V Garnacho-Castaño; Marcos Faundez-Zanuy; Noemí Serra-Payá; José L Maté-Muñoz; Josep López-Xarbau; Moisés Vila-Blanch
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after isometric and isotonic exercise on vertical jump performance.

Authors:  Salvador Vargas-Molina; Ulises Salgado-Ramírez; Iván Chulvi-Medrano; Leandro Carbone; Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo; Javier Benítez-Porres
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Positive Impulse Phase versus Propulsive Impulse Phase: Correlations between Asymmetry and Countermovement Jump Performance.

Authors:  Keith B Painter; William Guy Hornsby; Kevin Carroll; Satoshi Mizuguchi; Michael H Stone
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2022-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.