Tracey D Wade1, James Lock2. 1. Discipline of Psychology, College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 2. Discipline of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current research investigated whether a consensus among professional eating disorder researchers existed for definitions of remission and recovery that could be used in research. METHOD: Membership of the Eating Disorder Research Society and attendees at the 2018 annual meeting in Sydney were invited to participate in this investigation. Two surveys were conducted with 62 and 122 respondents, respectively. The first survey used a mix of forced choice yes/no or scaled responses. The second survey was a free response to the question "which definitions of recovery do you favor?" RESULTS: A majority consensus emerged about three issues. First, it was agreed that it was important to develop a standard definition of recovery for research purposes. Second, recovery needed to be evident over a 12-month period, with remission evident over a 3- to 12-month period. Third, recovery and remission required the absence of diagnostic criteria in addition to the presence of functional recovery. DISCUSSION: Consensus is apparent in the field. We suggest that future research seeks to: (a) validate the most commonly researched definition of remission and recovery across different eating disorders using a standardized battery of assessments, and (b) better understand differences in self-assessed and psychometrically assessed recovery.
OBJECTIVE: The current research investigated whether a consensus among professional eating disorder researchers existed for definitions of remission and recovery that could be used in research. METHOD: Membership of the Eating Disorder Research Society and attendees at the 2018 annual meeting in Sydney were invited to participate in this investigation. Two surveys were conducted with 62 and 122 respondents, respectively. The first survey used a mix of forced choice yes/no or scaled responses. The second survey was a free response to the question "which definitions of recovery do you favor?" RESULTS: A majority consensus emerged about three issues. First, it was agreed that it was important to develop a standard definition of recovery for research purposes. Second, recovery needed to be evident over a 12-month period, with remission evident over a 3- to 12-month period. Third, recovery and remission required the absence of diagnostic criteria in addition to the presence of functional recovery. DISCUSSION: Consensus is apparent in the field. We suggest that future research seeks to: (a) validate the most commonly researched definition of remission and recovery across different eating disorders using a standardized battery of assessments, and (b) better understand differences in self-assessed and psychometrically assessed recovery.
Authors: Melissa J Dreier; Avery L Van De Water; Danielle L Kahn; Kendra R Becker; Kamryn T Eddy; Jennifer J Thomas; Laura M Holsen; Elizabeth A Lawson; Madhusmita Misra; Amanda E Lyall; Lauren Breithaupt Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-13
Authors: Ilka Boehm; Julius Hennig; Franziska Ritschel; Daniel Geisler; Joseph A King; Isabel Lesch; Veit Roessner; Florian Daniel Zepf; Stefan Ehrlich Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 5.699