Literature DB >> 31469423

Diagnostic value of serum D-dimer, CA125, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in differentiating ovarian cancer and endometriosis.

Lifeng Chen1, Xinyan Wang1, Jing Shu1, Sheng Xu1, Qing Wu1, Yan Yu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of hematologic, inflammatory, and immunologic biomarkers for differentiating between ovarian cancer and endometriosis.
METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed from women diagnosed with ovarian cancer and endometriosis after ovarian cyst surgery in Zhejiang, China, 2014-2016. Serologic and hematologic biomarkers, including white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, platelets, and D-dimer, albumin, globulin, cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and CA199 serum levels recorded pre-operatively were assessed by ROC curve and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 49 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer and 192 with endometriosis. For predicting ovarian cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99); sensitivity, 93.2%; specificity, 87.5%) for log(D-dimer), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98; sensitivity, 81.3%; specificity, 96.3%) for log(CA125), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98; sensitivity, 92.6%; specificity, 79.2%) for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The AUC for the combination of D-dimer, NLR, and CA125 was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99; sensitivity, 91.6%; specificity, 89.6%).
CONCLUSION: Serum D-dimer, NLR, and CA125 were found to be potential diagnostic factors for ovarian cancer. Combined measurement of D-dimer, NLR, and CA125 might offer a convenient screening method.
© 2019 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer antigen 125; D-dimer; Diagnosis; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; Ovarian cancer; Ovarian endometriosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31469423     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  6 in total

1.  Application of an elevated plasma D-dimer cut-off value improves prognosis prediction of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Chong Chen; Jianhua Li; Jing Li; Xu Wang; Xiaoyan Wang; Na Du; Li Ren
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-09

2.  Diagnostic Value of Serum D-Dimer for Detection of Gallbladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  Weihao Kong; Li Zhang; Ran An; Mingwei Yang; Hao Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 3.  The systemic-level repercussions of cancer-associated inflammation mediators produced in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Dolores Aguilar-Cazares; Rodolfo Chavez-Dominguez; Mario Marroquin-Muciño; Mario Perez-Medina; Jesus J Benito-Lopez; Angel Camarena; Uriel Rumbo-Nava; Jose S Lopez-Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Diagnostic Sensitivity of NLR and PLR in Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tianyi Fang; Yimin Wang; Xin Yin; Zhao Zhai; Yu Zhang; Yongheng Yang; Qi You; Zhiguo Li; Yan Ma; Chunfeng Li; Haibin Song; Huawen Shi; Yongle Zhang; Xuefeng Yu; Hongyu Gao; Yihua Sun; Rui Xie; Yingwei Xue
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.818

5.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Liontos; A Andrikopoulou; K Koutsoukos; C Markellos; E Skafida; O Fiste; M Kaparelou; N Thomakos; D Haidopoulos; A Rodolakis; M A Dimopoulos; F Zagouri
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaotong Huang; Ziwei Wang; Meiqin Zhang; Hong Luo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.