Literature DB >> 31469302

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster vs. pregabalin.

Titas Buksnys1, Nigel Armstrong1, Gill Worthy1, Ingo Sabatschus2, Irmgard Boesl2, Bettina Buchheister2, Stephanie L Swift1, Caro Noake1, Vanessa Huertas Carrera1, Steve Ryder1, Dhwani Shah3, Hiltrud Liedgens2, Jos Kleijnen4.   

Abstract

Objective: Neuropathic pain prevalence is estimated between 7% and 10% of the population. International guidelines recommend a variety of drugs at different therapy lines for pain relief. However, side effect profiles, for example, prompted the UK government recently to classify pregabalin and gabapentin as class C drugs. Lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) might be a safer alternative. A systematic review assessed how LMP and pregabalin compared in terms of efficacy and safety. The review focused on pain reduction, quality of life and adverse events in peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) i.e. post-herpetic neuralgia, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, post-surgical/trauma, or other PNP conditions.
Methods: Electronic databases were searched as well as a number of other sources up to November 2018. Sensitive strategies were used, with no restriction by language or publication status. Two independent reviewers screened records and extracted data with consensus determining final decisions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration 2011 checklist for RCTs. Full network meta-analysis was conducted to compare LMP to pregabalin 300/600 mg in terms of pain reduction, quality of life, as well as serious adverse events and selected adverse events. Trials with enriched enrolment design were excluded.
Results: Searches retrieved 7,104 records. In total 111 references pertaining to 43 RCTs were included for data extraction. Bayesian network meta-analysis of several pain outcomes showed no clear difference in efficacy between treatments However, LMP was clearly advantageous in terms of dizziness and any adverse event vs. pregabalin 600 mg/day and discontinuations vs. pregabalin 300 mg/day or 600 mg/day, as well as being associated with improved quality of life (albeit in this case based on weak evidence).Conclusions: LMP was found to be similar to pregabalin in reducing pain in all populations but had a better adverse events profile.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuralgia; lidocaine; pregabalin; systematic review

Year:  2019        PMID: 31469302     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1662687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  3 in total

Review 1.  Topical Lidocaine for Chronic Pain Treatment.

Authors:  Marion Voute; Véronique Morel; Gisèle Pickering
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 2.  An Insight into Potential Pharmacotherapeutic Agents for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Zunaira Qureshi; Murtaza Najabat Ali; Minahil Khalid
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.011

3.  Comparative Benefit-Risk Assessment for Lidocaine 700 mg Medicated Plaster and Pregabalin in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Following a Structured Framework Approach.

Authors:  Ingo Sabatschus; Irmgard Bösl; Marlou Prevoo; Mariëlle Eerdekens; Arne Sprünken; Oliver Galm; Michael Forstner
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.