Literature DB >> 31468552

Association between peri-conceptional bisphenol A exposure in women and men and time to pregnancy-The HOPE study.

Dabin Yeum1, Shinyoung Ju2, Kyley J Cox2, Yue Zhang3, Joseph B Stanford1, Christina A Porucznik1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bisphenol A (BPA) is a non-persistent endocrine-disrupting chemical with nearly ubiquitous, involuntary exposure. Previous studies have shown that BPA causes reproductive dysfunction in animal models, but there are limited data regarding the effects of BPA exposure on time to pregnancy (TTP) in humans.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether peri-conceptional BPA exposure of women and men is associated with couples' TTP.
METHODS: A total of 164 heterosexual couples (164 women; 163 men) who have available BPA information as well as time to pregnancy from the Home Observation of Peri-conceptional Exposures (HOPE) Study were included and were followed up to 12 months. Women collected first-morning urine samples starting at the beginning of the fertile window and continued until the onset of menses or 18 days after the estimated day of ovulation (EDO+18 days). The time to pregnancy (TTP) after the enrolment was self-reported and used for the analysis. Discrete-time Cox proportional hazards models were performed to generate fecundability odds ratio (FOR) between BPA and TTP after adjusting for education and age, accounting for right censoring and prior number of cycles trying to conceive.
RESULTS: Among 164 couples, 125 couples became pregnant during the study. There was no association between TTP and peri-conceptional BPA exposure for both men (FOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72, 1.47) and women (FOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.75, 1.53) after adjusting for education and age.
CONCLUSIONS: No association was found between peri-conceptional BPA exposure and fecundability in this preconception cohort of relatively young, healthy pregnancy planners.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bisphenol A; endocrine disruptor; fecundability; peri-conception; pregnancy; time to pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31468552      PMCID: PMC7243339          DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  30 in total

1.  Reporting errors in time-to-pregnancy data collected with a short questionnaire. Impact on power and estimation of fecundability ratios.

Authors:  D D Baird; C R Weinberg; A S Rowland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Using cervical mucus and other easily observed biomarkers to identify ovulation in prospective pregnancy trials.

Authors:  Michael J Zinaman
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Time to pregnancy and occupational exposure to pesticides in fruit growers in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J de Cock; K Westveer; D Heederik; E te Velde; R van Kooij
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Bernardo Colombo; Donna D Baird
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant reduction in fecundity.

Authors:  Mohamed A M Hassan; Stephen R Killick
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Infertility, infertility treatment and psychomotor development: the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Jin Liang Zhu; Olga Basso; Carsten Obel; Dorte Hvidtjørn; Jørn Olsen
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Urinary bisphenol A, phthalates, and couple fecundity: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Anne M Sweeney; Enrique F Schisterman; José Maisog; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Subfecundity in overweight and obese couples.

Authors:  C H Ramlau-Hansen; A M Thulstrup; E A Nohr; J P Bonde; T I A Sørensen; J Olsen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Pilot test and validation of the peak day method of prospective determination of ovulation against a handheld urine hormone monitor.

Authors:  Christina A Porucznik; Kyley J Cox; Karen C Schliep; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  The Home Observation of Periconceptional Exposures (HOPE) study, a prospective cohort: aims, design, recruitment and compliance.

Authors:  Christina A Porucznik; Kyley J Cox; Karen C Schliep; Diana G Wilkins; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The current situation and future directions for the study on time-to-pregnancy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Xiang Hong; Jiechen Yin; Wei Wang; Fanqi Zhao; Hong Yu; Bei Wang
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.355

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.