M Wobith1, A Acikgöz2, K Grosser2, A Weimann2. 1. Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Onkologische Chirurgie, Klinikum St. Georg Leipzig, Delitzscher Str. 141, 04129, Leipzig, Deutschland. maria.wobith@sanktgeorg.de. 2. Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Onkologische Chirurgie, Klinikum St. Georg Leipzig, Delitzscher Str. 141, 04129, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal cancer is a frequent diagnosis in older patients. A curative resection, possibly in combination with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, is the standard therapy. The advanced age of the patients with an increasing number of comorbidities and often the presence of cognitive impairment represents a high risk for perioperative complications and a longer stay in hospital. The challenge in the clinical routine is to recognize a cognitive impairment in older patients and to prepare these patients for the operative intervention in the best possible way. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis was carried out to find out whether preoperative cognitive impairment is a prognostic factor for the postoperative outcome. METHODS: In patients over the age of 75 years who were prepared for abdominal surgery of gastrointestinal cancer in the preoperative consultation, the mini mental state examination (MMSE) and the clock test were carried out. The results of the tests were retrospectively compared with the complication rate and the duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Low MMSE values were significantly associated with the complication rate and the development of a severe complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a). A cut-off value of 24 points in the MMSE was predictive for the development of complications and a longer hospital stay. The age of the patients was not associated with the MMSE. CONCLUSION: Cognitive impairment is an important prognostic factor for the development of perioperative complications and the duration of the hospital stay in patients undergoing extensive abdominal surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Therefore, a preoperative assessment, for example with the MMSE, is recommended in order to identify high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND:Gastrointestinal cancer is a frequent diagnosis in older patients. A curative resection, possibly in combination with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, is the standard therapy. The advanced age of the patients with an increasing number of comorbidities and often the presence of cognitive impairment represents a high risk for perioperative complications and a longer stay in hospital. The challenge in the clinical routine is to recognize a cognitive impairment in older patients and to prepare these patients for the operative intervention in the best possible way. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis was carried out to find out whether preoperative cognitive impairment is a prognostic factor for the postoperative outcome. METHODS: In patients over the age of 75 years who were prepared for abdominal surgery of gastrointestinal cancer in the preoperative consultation, the mini mental state examination (MMSE) and the clock test were carried out. The results of the tests were retrospectively compared with the complication rate and the duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Low MMSE values were significantly associated with the complication rate and the development of a severe complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a). A cut-off value of 24 points in the MMSE was predictive for the development of complications and a longer hospital stay. The age of the patients was not associated with the MMSE. CONCLUSION:Cognitive impairment is an important prognostic factor for the development of perioperative complications and the duration of the hospital stay in patients undergoing extensive abdominal surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Therefore, a preoperative assessment, for example with the MMSE, is recommended in order to identify high-risk patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognitive impairment; High-risk patients; Mini mental state examination; Perioperative medicine; Prehabilitation
Authors: M G Huisman; R A Audisio; G Ugolini; I Montroni; A Vigano; J Spiliotis; C Stabilini; N de Liguori Carino; E Farinella; G Stanojevic; B T Veering; M W Reed; P S Somasundar; G H de Bock; B L van Leeuwen Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: D Pfirrmann; P Simon; M Mehdorn; M Hänsig; S Stehr; L Selig; A Weimann; M Knödler; F Lordick; A Mehnert; I Gockel Journal: Chirurg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Vanessa Raymont; William Bingley; Alec Buchanan; Anthony S David; Peter Hayward; Simon Wessely; Matthew Hotopf Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Oct 16-22 Impact factor: 79.321