Literature DB >> 31467806

Isolation, characterization, and cross-amplification of 20 microsatellite markers for Conospermum undulatum (Proteaceae).

Nicola Delnevo1, Andrea Piotti2, Eddie J van Etten1, William D Stock1, Margaret Byrne3.   

Abstract

PREMISE: Recent habitat fragmentation is posing a risk to the wavy-leaved smokebush, Conospermum undulatum (Proteaceae), a rare plant species endemic to southwestern Western Australia. Microsatellite markers are required to characterize the genetic diversity and structure of the species for conservation purposes and to facilitate ecological studies. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing was used to develop 20 novel microsatellite markers for C. undulatum. Polymorphism at each locus was assessed using 72 individuals from three natural populations. Nineteen markers were polymorphic, with the number of alleles per locus ranging from two to 21, and observed and expected heterozygosity ranging from 0.000 to 1.000 and 0.117 to 0.919, respectively. All markers successfully amplified in three congeneric species (C. stoechadis, C. canaliculatum and C. triplinervium).
CONCLUSIONS: The microsatellite markers will be useful for revealing patterns of genetic diversity, dispersal dynamics, and hybridization events for C. undulatum to inform future conservation efforts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Conospermum undulatum; Proteaceae; conservation; hybridization; microsatellite primers

Year:  2019        PMID: 31467806      PMCID: PMC6711349          DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


The genus Conospermum Sm. (Proteaceae) represents an important component of the heathlands and woodlands of Western Australian sandplains. The genus has 53 species endemic to Australia, with its center of distribution in southwestern Western Australia (Bennett, 1995). Within the South West Australian Floristic Region, a global biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al., 2000; Hopper and Gioia, 2004), many Conospermum species are of increasing conservation concern, with four taxa already declared rare by the Western Australia government (Government Gazette, 2018). Moreover, as for many proteaceous species, various Conospermum species are widely utilized in floriculture (Bennett, 1995; Stone et al., 2006). Conospermum undulatum Lindl. is a diploid shrub with its range restricted to ca. 55 km2 in a rapidly expanding urban zone in the metropolitan area of Perth (Close et al., 2006; Wardell‐Johnson et al., 2016). This species is listed as Vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Habitat fragmentation and hybridization with sympatric Conospermum species are likely to pose a risk to the future persistence of C. undulatum. In Conospermum, studies of population genetics and reproductive biology have been undertaken using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and random‐amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers for only a few species (Stone et al., 2006; Sinclair et al., 2008). To our knowledge, no microsatellite resources have been developed for this genus to date. Considering the growing concern about this endemic genus and the number of species within it, we expect that microsatellite markers will have broad applicability for conservation and population genetic analyses. Here, we report the development and characterization of 20 microsatellite markers for C. undulatum that will be useful for the study of its genetic structure, spatial patterns of genetic diversity, and dispersal dynamics. Additionally, we tested for cross‐amplification of these loci in three related Conospermum species to evaluate the utility of the marker set more broadly and specifically to allow assessment of hybridization between C. undulatum and neighboring species.

Methods and Results

Genomic DNA was extracted from freeze‐dried leaf material (ca. 50 mg) using a modified 2% cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, with 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone and 0.1% sodium sulphite added to the extraction buffer (Byrne et al., 2001). High‐quality DNA extracted from a single C. undulatum individual was used by the Monash University Malaysia genomics facility (Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia) for microsatellite development. Briefly, the extracted DNA was sheared to 500 bp using a Covaris M220 Focused‐Ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA), and a NEBNext Ultra DNA preparation kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) was used for library preparation after sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq desktop sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). Sequencing resulted in a total of 313,174 reads and a total data output of 78 Mbp (data available from the Dryad Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.f81k3q7). The obtained reads were searched for microsatellite loci having a minimum of five repeats using the QDDv3.1 pipeline (Meglécz et al., 2014). The resulting 9848 loci were sorted based on PCR product size, repeat class, repeat length, and multiplexing potential. Of these, 48 candidate loci characterized by perfect repeat motifs and different expected product sizes within the 90–300‐bp interval were tested for amplification on a total of six individuals from different populations. Initial screening was performed with Eppendorf Mastercycler ep (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) using 15‐μL reaction volumes containing 10 ng of genomic DNA, 50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.4), 0.2 mM each dNTP, 2 μM of forward and reverse primers, 2.75 μM MgCl2, and 0.1 μL Taq DNA polymerase. PCR reactions were performed with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 96°C for 2 min; followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were checked on 8% polyacrylamide gels to assess for successful amplification across all tested individuals. Of the markers that amplified successfully based on their multiplexing potential and consistent amplification within the expected size range, 22 were selected for initial testing for polymorphism and labeled with fluorescent dyes (VIC, PET, NED, 6‐FAM; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). In this step, we used 3.75 μL 2× Master Mix (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), 0.75 μL of 2 μM primer mix, 1 μL of 5–20 ng genomic DNA, and 2 μL sterile RNase‐free water (QIAGEN) in a 7.5‐μL reaction with the following PCR conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 90 s, and extension at 72°C for 60 s; and a final extension at 60°C for 30 min. The PCR products were diluted 10× and 1.0 μL of the dilution was added to a mix of 12.0 μL Hi‐Di Formamide (Applied Biosystems) and 0.1 μL GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems) for sequencing on a 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems). After testing, 20 markers (17 containing dinucleotide and three containing trinucleotide microsatellites) that consistently amplified with easily scorable peaks were selected and combined into five multiplexes (Table 1). Subsequently, those multiplexes were tested in 72 C. undulatum individuals from three populations (Appendix 1) using the same PCR conditions as described above. Plants were selected as evenly spaced as possible throughout the populations by using a grid of 15 × 15‐m quadrats where the closest plant to each corner of each quadrat was sampled. Leaves were kept separated per source plant, stored in silica gel after collection, and then freeze‐dried. DNA was extracted from 50 mg of freeze‐dried leaf material using a modified 2% CTAB method, as outlined above. Multiple runs were performed to ensure both the consistency of scoring and the accuracy of the final data set. In addition, we tested cross‐amplification with a total of 45 samples of three congeners (C. stoechadis Endl., C. canaliculatum Meisn., and C. triplinervium R. Br.) sampled within a 30‐km radius from the C. undulatum populations (Appendix 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of 20 microsatellite loci in Conospermum undulatum.

Locusa Primer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size range (bp)Fluorescent labelb Primer mix (μL)c GenBank accession no.
Multiplex 1
Cu4 F: GGAGACGGGAGAACTGTGGT (AG)10 88–112VIC3 MH917262
R: TACTAAACCCTACCACCCTACCC
Cu16 F: AGGATCCATATAGCCGACCC (AAC)7 100–127PET3 MH917265
R: AGCAGTTGCAGTTTCTGTGG
Cu31 F: GCAAGACAGACGCCCTAAGT (AG)18 131–2076‐FAM3 MH917272
R: GGCATTGTGGGTCATCTCCA
Cu41 F: ATGTCCCACCGGTATTCAGA (AG)6 242–276VIC3 MH917277
R: CTGAAGAGGAAGCAGGCCTT
Multiplex 2
Cu8 F: GCATATGGCCCTCATTGTCT (AG)6 95VIC3 MH917263
R: GACCTCCCAAAGATATGAGGCT
Cu17 F: AGCACTCACAAGTCTGACCC (AG)6 103–111PET6 MH917266
R: GCTCAGTAGCTGCCTTTGTC
Cu24 F: TGAGACCACAAACCAGACCC (AAG)7 140–146NED5 MH917269
R: TGTGTCTTCTGTGGCAGTAGT
Cu32 F: ACACAACAAGCCCTCATCAGT (AG)9 159–1896‐FAM4 MH917273
R: GGTCTGGCAAGTCCACTCTT
Multiplex 3
Cu9 F: GACTCTACAGAAGTCTCGCCC (AG)12 86–132VIC3 MH917264
R: GGCAAAGCAAGAGCATGGTT
Cu18 F: AACCCGCCAACAGAATCGAT (AG)8 105–111PET6 MH917267
R: TGATCACATGAGGGTAGTAAGC
Cu28 F: GTTCCTCCATTTCGAAACCCT (AG)17 124–160NED4 MH917270
R: ACCGTTTCGTTTCGTCTCAGT
Cu33 F: AAGAAATGAAGCAAGGCGTG (AG)22 144–1986‐FAM3 MH917274
R: GTAGGAGTCCAAGACCCGTTG
Multiplex 4
Cu20 F: TCTCCATCAGTACCGCTACCT (AG)7 122–128VIC2 MH917268
R: GCTTCCAGTTCCCACCAAAC
Cu29 F: GACCAGTGAACTCTCAAGGACT (AG)7 142–186PET6 MH917271
R: CGCAGCTAGCCGACTTAGAA
Cu36 F: TGCTTCCTTTCAACGCTTGG (AGC)8 186–201NED4 MH917275
R: TGTAAGTGTACAAGGGTCGCC
Cu39 F: ACACCAAAGCAAGGCATGAA (AG)10 201–2556‐FAM4 MH917276
R: TGCAAACAAGTGGCCTACCA
Multiplex 5
Cu15 F: TCGTGATTTCAACCTTGACCA (AG)9 93–131VIC3 MK570861
R: TGGAACTGGTCATCCCTCCA
Cu22 F: TGCACAAAGAAGATGGAAGCTG (AG)11 122–158NED1 MK570862
R: CCGTCCACGTATTGCAGAGA
Cu38 F: AGTTCATATGCCAGCGTAATCG (AG)9 196–2326‐FAM3 MK570863
R: AACGTCCCAGACCAACGATC
Cu45 F: CTCCAATGGCTACCGTCGAG (AG)10 249–281PET5 MK570864
R: TGACAATTCACATGCATGATGC

An annealing temperature of 60°C was used for all loci.

Fluorescent label refers to Applied Biosystems fluorescent dyes used in sequencing reactions.

Microliters of primer working solution (2 μM) in 100 μL.

Characteristics of 20 microsatellite loci in Conospermum undulatum. An annealing temperature of 60°C was used for all loci. Fluorescent label refers to Applied Biosystems fluorescent dyes used in sequencing reactions. Microliters of primer working solution (2 μM) in 100 μL. Allele size was determined using GeneMapper Software v5 (Applied Biosystems). GenAlEx v6.51 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012) was used to calculate number of alleles per locus and levels of expected and observed heterozygosity for loci in three populations (Table 2). Evidence of linkage disequilibrium was assessed by GENEPOP (Rousset, 2008) based on 10,000 permutations. The frequency of possible null alleles, genotyping failure, and inbreeding were estimated using INEST 2.2 (Chybicki and Burczyk, 2009) after 500,000 Markov chain iterations.
Table 2

Genetic characterization of 20 newly developed microsatellite loci across three populations of Conospermum undulatum.a

Locus A T Population 1 (n = 24)Population 2 (n = 24)Population 3 (n = 24)
A H o H e Null A H o H e Null A H o H e Null
Multiplex 1
Cu41190.6670.811100.7500.82290.8330.824
Cu16850.6670.74580.6250.69460.3330.6810.173
Cu3121160.8330.894170.7500.884151.0000.891
Cu41330.0830.4240.23920.1670.50020.0000.4860.303
Multiplex 2
Cu811NDND1NDND1NDND
Cu17550.4440.65620.0000.4130.28020.0870.4990.311
Cu24330.3910.32220.3330.27820.1250.117
Cu32980.6670.63750.6250.64850.5420.582
Multiplex 3
Cu921140.8750.904130.7500.882160.9580.919
Cu18440.5420.67440.6670.70240.5000.672
Cu2818151.0000.914140.9170.888110.8750.846
Cu3321140.7920.878150.9580.886110.8330.861
Multiplex 4
Cu20440.2500.46320.4350.4990.15520.2500.413
Cu2916100.4170.8000.17690.1740.6960.29780.3750.643
Cu36650.3750.41950.4170.43640.4170.355
Cu3917120.6520.8630.138140.8750.888100.9170.852
Multiplex 5
Cu1515110.4170.7920.17790.5000.485130.5830.8280.108
Cu2215100.7080.822100.8330.841120.7920.823
Cu3815100.9170.800100.8330.80880.8330.742
Cu4516140.7080.839110.6250.870120.7500.877
Mean11.458.6500.5700.6838.1500.5620.6567.6500.5500.646
SE1.5211.0370.0600.0541.1200.0670.0551.0620.0750.059

A = number of alleles; A T = overall number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled; Null = estimated frequency of null alleles where different from zero; ND = not determined.

Localities and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Genetic characterization of 20 newly developed microsatellite loci across three populations of Conospermum undulatum.a A = number of alleles; A T = overall number of alleles; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of individuals sampled; Null = estimated frequency of null alleles where different from zero; ND = not determined. Localities and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Evaluation of loci showed no indication of linkage disequilibrium for any pairwise combination of loci, nor was there significant genotyping failure. Loci Cu15, Cu17, Cu29, and Cu41 showed evidence of null alleles in two out of three populations and should be used with caution in analyses whose results may be inflated by the occurrence of null alleles. One locus was monomorphic in the three C. undulatum populations investigated in this study (i.e., Cu8; Table 2). However, this marker was polymorphic in two of the three other Conospermum species considered. Overall, we observed 229 alleles at the 20 microsatellite loci, with an average of 11.45 alleles per locus. Observed and expected heterozygosity levels per locus ranged from 0.000 to 1.000 and from 0.117 to 0.919, respectively (Table 2). Inbreeding was not included as a variable in the most likely INEST model to explain excess of homozygosity and, therefore, average within‐population inbreeding was not statistically different from zero in any of the three analyzed populations. All microsatellite loci showed successful cross‐amplification in C. stoechadis, C. canaliculatum, and C. triplinervium (Table 3) using the same extraction method and amplification conditions outlined above. Analysis of amplification showed similar number of alleles amplified in C. stoechadis and C. canaliculatum as in C. undulatum, whereas fewer alleles were detected in C. triplinervium.
Table 3

Cross‐amplification of 20 microsatellite loci developed for Conospermum undulatum in three related speciesa

Locus C. stoechadis (n = 15) C. canaliculatum (n = 15) C. triplinervium (n = 15)
Amplification A Allele size (bp)Amplification A Allele size (bp)Amplification A Allele size (bp)
Multiplex 1
Cu415786–10414484–9215192
Cu16155100–112155100–112152103
Cu311512131–1671513133–165152139–141
Cu41153242–246154242–248152246–250
Multiplex 2
Cu81519515275–9515275–95
Cu17154107–113154101–111152100–111
Cu24153140–146153140–146151140
Cu32154161–187156161–175151163
Multiplex 3
Cu915888–122151082–120141102
Cu18154105–111154105–111151109
Cu281510124–1541513124–168153136–148
Cu331511146–1781512152–188154164–168
Multiplex 4
Cu20152124–126154122–128152128–132
Cu29156150–178149148–172152150–152
Cu36153189–201156186–201152186–198
Cu39159201–2371510213–249153215–223
Multiplex 5
Cu15151093–123141091–129153105–111
Cu22146126–1521311116–152144128–148
Cu38156196–220157200–232152202–204
Cu451511247–2751512247–281143259–269

A = number of alleles; Amplification = number of individuals successfully amplified; n = number of individuals used.

Localities and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Cross‐amplification of 20 microsatellite loci developed for Conospermum undulatum in three related speciesa A = number of alleles; Amplification = number of individuals successfully amplified; n = number of individuals used. Localities and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Conclusions

Twenty microsatellite markers were developed for C. undulatum. These markers will be used for investigating population genetic structure, dispersal dynamics, and possible hybridization events of this rare species to underpin its management and conservation. These newly developed markers are likely to be useful for genetic studies on phylogenetically related species given the successful cross‐amplification for three different Conospermum species.

Author Contributions

N.D. wrote the manuscript, designed the experiment, and collected and analyzed data. A.P. contributed with analyses and interpretation of data and critically revised the manuscript. E.J.v.E. contributed to the design the experiment and collection of data and revised the manuscript. W.D.S. designed the experiment and critically revised the manuscript. M.B. helped improve the design of the experiment and critically revised the manuscript.
SpeciesVouchera Collection locality N Geographic coordinates
Conospermum undulatum Lindl.PERTH 06797083Maida vale24Rare flora
PERTH 09006176Orange grove24Rare flora
PERTH 09006192Orange grove24Rare flora
Conospermum stoechadis Endl. PERTH 07795092Koondoola regional bushland15−31.846111, 115.874722
Conospermum canaliculatum Meisn.PERTH 062564307 km NE of Yanchep15−31.489641, 115.668538
Conospermum triplinervium R. Br.PERTH 07800754Kings Park, Perth15−31.966827, 115.836388

N = number of individuals per population.

Vouchers are stored in the Western Australian Herbarium (PERTH), Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

  6 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Incorporation of sodium sulfite into extraction protocol minimizes degradation of Acacia DNA.

Authors:  M Byrne; B Macdonald; M Francki
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux.

Authors:  François Rousset
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  QDD version 3.1: a user-friendly computer program for microsatellite selection and primer design revisited: experimental validation of variables determining genotyping success rate.

Authors:  Emese Meglécz; Nicolas Pech; André Gilles; Vincent Dubut; Pascal Hingamp; Aurélie Trilles; Rémi Grenier; Jean-François Martin
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.

Authors:  Igor J Chybicki; Jaroslaw Burczyk
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Floral display and habitat fragmentation: Effects on the reproductive success of the threatened mass-flowering Conospermum undulatum (Proteaceae).

Authors:  Nicola Delnevo; Eddie J van Etten; Margaret Byrne; William D Stock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.