| Literature DB >> 31467578 |
Yu-Liang Chen1, Tsung-Chieh Lee1, Yun-Tai Chen1, Lun-Chien Lo2, Wen-Yu Hsu3, Wen-Chen Ouyang4.
Abstract
High compliance with methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) is crucial to successful opioid abstinence in addicts. However, MMT has numerous side effects, including reductions in quality of life and quality of sleep. Many studies have demonstrated that electroacupuncture relieves withdrawal symptoms in opioid addicts. The present study was a case-control study. From January 2015 to September 2016, 106 patients undergoing MMT at a medical center in central Taiwan were recruited and separated into an electroacupuncture treatment group and a control group. Electroacupuncture was performed for 15 minutes twice weekly for 4 weeks. The electroacupuncture treatment group was discovered to have improved quality of life, especially in terms of vitality and mental health. Although electroacupuncture did not significantly improve sleep quality, we found that sleep quality was significantly improved once methadone dosage had been reduced. Electroacupuncture can improve quality of life in patients undergoing MMT. If methadone dosage can be reduced and electroacupuncture can be employed, both sleep and life quality can be improved.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31467578 PMCID: PMC6699302 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7032581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Baseline characteristics.
| Control group (n=30) | Treatment group (n=76) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | P value | ||
| Age | mean±Std | 45.80±9.25 | 48.88±8.98 | .117 | ||
| Gender | Male | 26 | 87% | 65 | 86% | .879 |
| Female | 4 | 13% | 11 | 14% | ||
| Education | Elementary School | 3 | 10% | 24 | 32% | .010 |
| Junior High School | 14 | 47% | 38 | 50% | ||
| Senior High School | 13 | 43% | 14 | 18% | ||
| Marital Status | Unmarried | 11 | 37% | 25 | 33% | .642 |
| Married | 13 | 43% | 29 | 38% | ||
| Divorced or Widowed | 6 | 20% | 22 | 29% | ||
Figure 1Improvement in quality of life. PF: physical functioning; RP: role limitations of physical problems; BP: bodily pain; GH: general health; VT: vitality; SF: social functioning; RE: role of emotions; MH: mental health.
Influence of electroacupuncture on SF-36 scores.
| Aspects (Deteriorated vs. Improved) | Independent Variable | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Functioning | Treatment vs. Control | 1.23 | 0.42 | 3.59 | .708 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 1.58 | 0.45 | 5.58 | .478 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 2.35 | 0.73 | 7.58 | .152 | |
| Role Physical | Treatment vs. Control | 1.33 | 0.44 | 4.06 | .612 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 1.17 | 0.31 | 4.37 | .816 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 1.83 | 0.54 | 6.23 | .332 | |
| Role Emotional | Treatment vs. Control | 0.92 | 0.30 | 2.89 | .893 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 0.80 | 0.18 | 3.58 | .767 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 0.69 | 0.19 | 2.58 | .582 | |
| Bodily Pain | Treatment vs. Control | 2.10 | 0.78 | 5.67 | .143 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 2.98 | 0.87 | 10.24 | .083 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 2.37 | 0.79 | 7.11 | .123 | |
| Vitality | Treatment vs. Control | 2.70 | 1.03 | 7.05 | .043 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 1.40 | 0.42 | 4.64 | .587 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 1.00 | 0.34 | 2.97 | .994 | |
| Mental Health | Treatment vs. Control | 3.72 | 1.37 | 10.12 | .010 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 0.93 | 0.25 | 3.53 | .916 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 0.60 | 0.18 | 1.99 | .408 | |
| Social Functioning | Treatment vs. Control | 1.38 | 0.52 | 3.68 | .517 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 1.15 | 0.34 | 3.97 | .821 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 0.98 | 0.33 | 2.94 | .970 | |
| General Health Perception | Treatment vs. Control | 2.40 | 0.95 | 6.09 | .064 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 0.90 | 0.28 | 2.91 | .862 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 1.00 | 0.35 | 2.87 | .998 | |
Control variables: age, sex, educational level, and marital status.
Figure 2Improvement in sleep quality. SSQ: subjective sleep quality; SL: sleep latency; SD: sleep duration; HSE: habitual sleep efficiency; S Db: sleep disturbance; USM: use of sleep-related medication; DD: daytime dysfunction.
Influence of electroacupuncture on PSQI scores.
| Aspects (Deteriorated vs. Improved) | Independent Variable | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep latency | Treatment vs. Control | 1.26 | 0.42 | 3.59 | .672 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 0.57 | 0.15 | 2.17 | .409 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 0.75 | 0.22 | 2.54 | .638 | |
| Sleep duration | Treatment vs. Control | 1.18 | 0.40 | 3.45 | .763 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 0.51 | 0.11 | 2.34 | .389 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 0.51 | 0.12 | 2.10 | .350 | |
| Habitual sleep efficiency | Treatment vs. Control | 0.46 | 0.11 | 1.96 | .292 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 0.35 | 0.07 | 1.71 | .196 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 1.47 | 0.30 | 7.26 | .636 | |
| Sleep disturbance | Treatment vs. Control | 0.55 | 0.10 | 3.01 | .487 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 1.05 | 0.09 | 12.98 | .968 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 0.35 | 0.05 | 2.73 | .318 | |
| Subjective sleep quality | Treatment vs. Control | 0.97 | 0.33 | 2.86 | .954 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 1.45 | 0.38 | 5.46 | .583 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 1.11 | 0.36 | 3.45 | .851 | |
| Use of sleep medication | Treatment vs. Control | 1.34 | 0.42 | 4.27 | .623 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 2.21 | 0.52 | 9.38 | .281 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 1.69 | 0.49 | 5.85 | .405 | |
| Daytime Dysfunction | Treatment vs. Control | 0.79 | 0.22 | 2.84 | .720 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 0.37 | 0.07 | 1.81 | .218 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 0.79 | 0.18 | 3.37 | .748 | |
| Total score | Treatment vs. Control | 1.11 | 0.43 | 2.87 | .836 |
| Heroin dosage increase vs. remain | 1.42 | 0.45 | 4.51 | .551 | |
| Heroin dosage decrease vs. remain | 3.40 | 1.16 | 9.97 | .026 | |
Control variables: age, sex, educational level, and marital status.