| Literature DB >> 31467354 |
Madoka Ichikawa-Seki1, Daisuke Motooka2, Aiko Kinami3, Fumi Murakoshi4,5, Yoko Takahashi6, Junya Aita1, Kei Hayashi1,7, Atsushi Tashibu1, Shota Nakamura2, Tetsuya Iida2, Toshihiro Horii2, Yoshifumi Nishikawa8.
Abstract
The faecal microbiota plays a critical role in host health, with alterations in the human faecal microbial composition associated with various conditions, particularly diarrhoeal diseases. However, little is known about microbial changes during cryptosporidiosis, one of the most important diarrhoeal diseases caused by protozoa in cattle. In this study, alterations in the faecal microbiota of neonatal calves as a result of Cryptosporidium parvum infection were investigated on a C. parvum-positive farm. Comparisons were made among groups of C. parvum-infected, rotavirus-infected, and the pathogen-negative calves. A specific increase in the abundance of Fusobacterium was observed in the faecal microbiota of C. parvum-infected animals. Diarrhoea severity increased in accordance with the abundance of C. parvum and Fusobacterium. Moreover, the specific increase of Fusobacterium appeared to be a universal feature of C. parvum infection, since neonatal calves from geographically separated areas showed the same result. These observations indicated that the growth of Fusobacterium may be an important aggravating factor of cryptosporidiosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31467354 PMCID: PMC6715637 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48969-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Distribution of bacterial relative abundance among the three groups of faecal samples collected at farm #A: Cryptosporidium parvum-only-infected (n = 8), rotavirus-only-infected (n = 5) and pathogen-negative (n = 7). An average value for the relative abundance across the six sampling points for each genus is shown using a gradient scale. (a) The 261 analysed genera (Table S2) were plotted as rows in which the most abundant genus in the C. parvum-only infected group is shown at the top. The next most abundant genera are shown sequentially in order of abundance. (b) The 10 most abundant genera (shown on the left-hand side) in the C. parvum-only-infected group in comparison with the corresponding abundances in the rotavirus-only-infected and pathogen-negative groups. The top 10 genera were obtained from (a). A specific increase of Fusobacterium in the C. parvum-only-infected group was suggested. (c–e) Time-dependent change of bacterial relative abundance among C. parvum-only-infected, rotavirus-only-infected and pathogen-negative groups. The column titles are the numbers of faecal samples collected in each age in days (see Table S1).
Figure 2Comparisons of Fusobacterium loads obtained by metagenomic analysis among the three groups: Cryptosporidium parvum-only-infected (n = 8), rotavirus-only-infected (n = 5), and the pathogen-negative (n = 7) samples collected from farm #A. (a) The relative ratios of Fusobacterium for all the calves in relation to their age (upper). Wilcoxon test was performed to reveal the significant differences between the 1st (0–1 day old) and the 6th (10–15 days old) sampling points in the three groups (lower). The increase of Fusobacterium was detected in C. parvum-only-infected group (*P < 0.05). (b) The specific increase in the abundance of Fusobacterium in C. parvum-only-infected calves at the 6th sampling point was confirmed by quantitative PCR (Kruskal-Wallis test, *P < 0.05).
Figure 3Fusobacterium loads in samples from Cryptosporidium parvum-positive or -negative calves aged 11–15 days from the farms in Okinawa (n = 7), Kagoshima (n = 1), Iwate (n = 9) and Hokkaido (n = 6) prefectures. The increase in abundance of Fusobacterium in C. parvum-positive samples (n = 9) was detected in six samples by quantitative PCR (qPCR). No increase was observed in C. parvum-negative samples (n = 14). A highly significant correlation was observed (r = 0.61, *P < 0.05).
Association between the presence of Cryptosporidium parvum and Fusobacterium in faecal samples collected from 11–15 days old calves in the different locations.
| total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6* | (26.1%) | 3 | (13.0%) | 9 | |
| 0 | (0%) | 14* | (60.9%) | 14 | |
| total | 6 | 17 | 23 | ||
Statistically significant associations were observed between Cryptosporidium parvum and Fusobacterium (Fisher’s exact test, *P < 0.05).
Figure 4Oocyst numbers and faecal scores during Cryptosporidium parvum infections in relation to the relative ratios of Fusobacterium. (a) Average numbers of C. parvum oocysts, relative ratios of Fusobacterium, and faecal scores for each sampling day for the C. parvum-positive samples from farm #A. (b) Correlation between the number of C. parvum oocysts and the relative ratios of Fusobacterium for the C. parvum-positive samples from farm #A. A moderately positive correlation was observed (r = 0.47, *P < 0.05).