| Literature DB >> 31467048 |
Kun Tang1, Hanyu Wang2, Shi Hui Tan3, Tong Xin4, Xueqi Qu5, Tianyu Tang6, Yuqi Wang2, Yuning Liu5, Junjian Gaoshan7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between maternal education and breast feeding in the Chinese population, with a consideration of household income and health-seeking behaviours.Entities:
Keywords: China; breast feeding; income; maternal education; social determinants
Year: 2019 PMID: 31467048 PMCID: PMC6720234 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Demographic and social-economic characteristics of the participants
| Maternal education | ||||
| Primary school and below | Middle school | High school/vocational school | College and above | |
| Mean maternal age, year (SD) | 28.76 (6.68) | 28.41 (5.21) | 28.26 (4.78) | 30.36 (4.51) |
| Mean pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m2 (SD) | 22.67 (4.66) | 22.44 (4.16) | 21.74 (4.04) | 21.75 (4.12) |
| Mean gestational age, week (SD) | 39.02 (1.38) | 39.03 (1.40) | 38.94 (1.51) | 38.98 (1.38) |
| Mean infant birth weight, kg (SD) | 3.23 (0.47) | 3.33 (0.59) | 3.34 (0.67) | 3.43 (0.75) |
| Mean infant age, day (SD) | 186.50 (106.82) | 182.11 (104.48) | 178.29 (105.82) | 173.10 (105.52) |
| Infant sex, % | ||||
| Male | 50.67 | 50.64 | 52.17 | 50.08 |
| Female | 49.33 | 49.36 | 47.83 | 49.92 |
| Parity, % | ||||
| Primiparous | 29.70 | 33.87 | 43.49 | 62.06 |
| Multiparous | 70.30 | 66.13 | 56.51 | 37.94 |
| Delivery method, % | ||||
| Vaginal | 65.77 | 56.72 | 54.59 | 57.01 |
| Caesarean section | 34.23 | 43.28 | 45.41 | 42.99 |
| Region, % | ||||
| Super city | 9.70 | 14.16 | 30.82 | 61.55 |
| Urban | 43.15 | 32.08 | 39.09 | 27.41 |
| Rural | 7.15 | 25.39 | 21.09 | 7.29 |
| Poor rural | 40.00 | 28.37 | 9.00 | 3.75 |
| Household income, % | ||||
| ≤40 000 yuan | 61.74 | 37.44 | 20.06 | 11.81 |
| 40 000–79,999 yuan | 22.39 | 30.01 | 26.21 | 13.82 |
| ≥80 000 yuan | 3.48 | 7.84 | 16.40 | 38.89 |
| Maternal occupation, % | ||||
| Agriculture related | 57.89 | 33.61 | 9.37 | 2.27 |
| Factory workers | 11.53 | 19.95 | 20.31 | 8.66 |
| White-collar | 11.77 | 26.74 | 47.23 | 73.03 |
| Others* | 18.81 | 19.71 | 23.09 | 16.04 |
| Resident status, % | ||||
| Local | 69.70 | 69.15 | 59.50 | 53.65 |
| Migrant | 30.30 | 30.85 | 40.50 | 46.35 |
| Breastfeeding practice, % | ||||
| Early initiation | 64.85 | 68.24 | 71.11 | 77.21 |
| Current BF | 87.88 | 88.53 | 85.09 | 86.21 |
| Ever BF | 95.52 | 97.31 | 97.65 | 97.93 |
| Exclusive BF (0–6 months) | 26.53 | 15.36 | 13.64 | 14.06 |
| Predominant BF (0–6 months) | 50.00 | 39.99 | 18.44 | 39.29 |
| Health-seeking behaviours | ||||
| Considered feeding method before pregnancy | 28.31 | 45.35 | 50.24 | 55.29 |
| Attended mother support group | 8.24 | 24.40 | 38.20 | 49.36 |
| Received breastfeeding education | 38.59 | 47.23 | 59.13 | 64.23 |
*Others refer to unidentified occupation, unemployed and housewives
BF, breast feeding; BMI, body mass index; ever BF, ever brest fed.
Relations between breastfeeding practices and maternal education*
| Unadjusted risk ratio (95% CI) | ||||
| Primary school and below | Middle school | High school/vocational school | College and above | |
| Early initiation | 1 | 1.05 (0.97 to 1.13) | 1.10 (1.01 to 1.19) | 1.19 (1.09 to 1.29) |
| Current BF | 1 | 1.01 (1.01 to 1.01) | 0.97 (0.96 to 1.00) | 0.98 (0.97 to 1.01) |
| Ever BF | 1 | 1.02 (1.02 to 1.03) | 1.02 (1.02 to 1.02) | 1.03 (1.03 to 1.03) |
| Exclusive BF (0–6 months) | 1 | 0.58 (0.52 to 0.64) | 0.51 (0.42 to 0.60) | 0.53 (0.47 to 0.59) |
| Predominant BF (0–6 months) | 1 | 0.80 (0.72 to 0.87) | 0.37 (0.24 to 0.50) | 0.79 (0.70 to 0.89) |
*Adjusted for maternal age, infant birth weight, infant sex, parity, delivery method, household income, region (super city/urban/rural/poor rural), residency (local/migrant), paternal education and occupation.
BF, breastfeeding; ever BF, ever breastfed.
Figure 1Adjusted prevalence* of early initiation in different maternal education groups, stratified by household income. *After adjusting for maternal age, infant sex, parity, delivery method, paternal education, region (super city/urban/rural/poor rural), residency (local/migrant) and occupation.
Figure 2Adjusted prevalence* of exclusive breast feeding in different maternal education groups, stratified by household income. *After adjusting for maternal age, infant sex, parity, delivery method, paternal education, region (super city/urban/rural/poor rural), residency (local/migrant) and occupation.
Figure 3Adjusted prevalence* of considering feeding method before pregnancy, attending mother support group, receiving breastfeeding education in different maternal education groups. *After adjusting for maternal age, infant sex, parity, delivery method, paternal education, household income, region (super city/urban/rural/poor rural), residency (local/migrant) and occupation.