Literature DB >> 31466802

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma of the head and neck: a multicentre study to examine safety, efficacy, and prognostic value.

B Passmore-Webb1, B Gurney2, H M Yuen3, J Sloane4, J Lee5, M Proctor6, F Sundram7, C Newlands8, S Sharma9.   

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate staging procedure for malignant melanoma but its use in patients with melanoma of the head and neck has been questioned in the past because of a perceived record of poor safety and accuracy. Technical improvements have sought to redress this. Vital structures and variable lymphatic pathways can make its use in the head and neck challenging. In our study we have examined the data and the experiences of clinicians from University Hospital Southampton and the Royal Surrey County Hospital. We retrospectively analysed the data and case notes of 143 patients who had SLNB to establish its safety, efficacy, and prognostic value. The detection rate of at least one sentinel lymph node was 100%. Nodes positive for metastatic melanoma were found in 20% of patients. Of them, 76% went on to have completion lymphadenectomy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that positive SLNB was a strong predictor of reduced overall survival for all Breslow-thickness melanomas (HR=3.9, p=0.019) and intermediate melanomas (HR=6.3, p=0.007). It predicted reduced recurrence-free survival for all melanomas (HR=7.4, p<0.001) and was a strong predictor for those of intermediate thickness (HR=8.3, p<0.001). The false negative rate was 9.4% and false omission rate 2.6%. Temporary and permanent morbidity rates were 2.1% and 0%, respectively. SLNB for melanoma in the head and neck is a safe, accurate staging procedure that offers prognostically useful information. The upstaging of disease allows access to trial-based targeted treatments.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficacy; head and neck melanoma; melanoma; prognostic value; safety; sentinel lymph node biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31466802     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  2 in total

1.  Do Oncologic Outcomes From Head and Neck Versus Truncal and Extremity Melanoma Differ? A Single-Institution Single-Subspecialty Experience.

Authors:  Kirsten M Baecher; Michael K Turgeon; Caroline R Medin; Geetha Mahendran; Terrill M Flakes; Keith A Delman; Michael C Lowe
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Head and neck melanoma: outcome and predictors in a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Steffen Spoerl; Gerrit Spanier; Elena Reiter; Michael Gerken; Sebastian Haferkamp; Jirka Grosse; Konstantin Drexler; Tobias Ettl; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; René Fischer; Silvia Spoerl; Torsten E Reichert; Christoph Klingelhöffer
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.