| Literature DB >> 31466362 |
Zhi-Dan Sun1, Jiang-Shan Zhao1, Xue-Hai Ju2, Qi-Ying Xia3.
Abstract
On the basis of thieno(3,2-b)thiophene and dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]thiophene (T2 and T3 moieties) as π-linker, the A, D and S series dyes were designed to investigate the effect of the introducing N+ as an "electron trap" into T2 and T3 on the properties of the dyes. The optimized structures, electronic and optical properties were investigated by the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT). The results show that the properties of the dyes are sensitive to the N+ position in π-linkers. D series dyes with electron-withdrawing units located near the donor have better properties than the corresponding A series with the electron-withdrawing units located near the acceptor. For A and D series, the N+ modified dye named T2N+1-d displays the largest red shift of the UV-vis absorption, the maximum integral values of the adsorption-wavelength curves over the visible light, the highest light harvesting efficiency (LHE, 0.996), and the strongest adsorption energy (-44.33 kcal/mol). T2N+1-d also has a large driving force of hole injection (ΔGinj, -0.74 eV), which results in a more efficient hole injection. Bearing a lengthier π-linker than T2N+1-d, the properties of T2N+1-s are further improved. T2N+1-d moiety or its increased conjugated derivatives may be a promising π-linker.Entities:
Keywords: amine salt; density functional theory (DFT); dyes; p-type dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs); π-linker
Year: 2019 PMID: 31466362 PMCID: PMC6749191 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24173134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Molecular structures of the investigated dyes.
Figure 2Absorption spectra of dyes. Comparison of T1, T2, and D series (a), comparison between D and A series (b), comparison between D and S series (c), and comparison of the selected dyes and T series (d).
Figure 3The integral area of absorption-wavelength curve over 400~800 nm.
Figure 4Frontier molecular orbital energy levels and energy gap, together with EVB (NiO) and E(I−/I3−).
Contours of molecular frontier orbitals of dyes.
| Dyes | HOMO | LUMO | Dyes | HOMO | LUMO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed ∆Ginj, ∆Greg, ∆GCR, transition configuration and LHE of the dyes.
| Dyes | ∆ | ∆ | ∆ |
| Main Configurations | LHE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.38 | −1.15 | −1.98 | 1.7761 | H → L (69%), | 0.983 |
|
| −0.33 | −1.13 | −1.96 | 2.0281 | H → L (70%), | 0.991 |
|
| −0.28 | −1.12 | −1.95 | 2.1153 | H → L (71%), | 0.992 |
|
| −0.42 | −1.08 | −1.91 | 2.1453 | H → L (69%), | 0.993 |
|
| −0.59 | −0.84 | −1.67 | 2.2128 | H → L (65%), | 0.994 |
|
| −0.84 | −0.79 | −1.62 | 2.3563 | H → L (54%), | 0.996 |
|
| −0.74 | −0.78 | −1.61 | 2.3603 | H → L (74%), | 0.996 |
|
| −0.78 | −0.95 | −1.78 | 1.8304 | H → L (28%), | 0.985 |
|
| −0.40 | −0.97 | −1.80 | 1.9442 | H → L (61%), | 0.989 |
|
| −0.55 | −0.68 | −1.51 | 1.9640 | H → L (59%), | 0.989 |
|
| −0.61 | −0.43 | −1.26 | 1.7537 | H → L (56%), | 0.982 |
|
| −0.57 | −0.40 | −1.23 | 1.7036 | H → L (63%), | 0.980 |
|
| −0.57 | −0.76 | −1.59 | 1.7718 | H → L (45%), | 0.983 |
|
| −0.36 | −1.09 | −1.92 | 2.2651 | H → L (69%), | 0.995 |
|
| −0.56 | −0.88 | −1.71 | 2.3316 | H → L (64%), | 0.995 |
|
| −0.80 | −0.87 | −1.70 | 2.4503 | H → L (58%), | 0.996 |
|
| −0.68 | −0.82 | −1.65 | 2.5318 | H → L (77%), | 0.997 |
|
| −0.57 | −0.76 | −1.59 | 1.8501 | H → L (43%), | 0.986 |
a ∆Ginj = EHOMO − EVB(NiO) [3,29]; b ∆Greg = E(I−/I3−) − ELUMO [3,29]; c ∆GCR = ELUMO − EVB(NiO) [3,29].
Figure 5The comparison of the simulated UV-vis absorption spectra between RN+/PF6− and the RN+.
Figure 6Comparison of the frontier molecular orbital energy levels and energy gaps of RN+/PF6− and the RN+.
Figure 7Adsorption of T2N+1-d on (NiO)10 × 2.
Adsorption energy (EAd) and bond lengths between the dye and (NiO) 10 × 2.
| Dyes | Band Length (Å) | Dyes | Band Length (Å) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ni1-O1 | Ni2-O2 | Ni1-O1 | Ni2-O2 | ||||
|
| −37.88 | 2.05 | 2.06 |
| −41.82 | 2.02 | 2.06 |
|
| −38.72 | 2.03 | 2.06 |
| −42.32 | 2.05 | 2.06 |
|
| −42.92 | 2.06 | 2.07 |
| −42.49 | 2.05 | 2.06 |
|
| −39.65 | 2.04 | 2.06 |
| −37.14 | 1.99 | 1.99 |
|
| −42.28 | 2.05 | 2.06 |
| −42.79 | 2.06 | 2.07 |
|
| −42.96 | 2.02 | 2.06 |
| −43.83 | 2.04 | 2.06 |
|
| −44.33 | 2.05 | 2.07 |
| −44.94 | 2.03 | 2.06 |
|
| −41.25 | 2.03 | 2.06 |
| −45.22 | 2.04 | 2.05 |
|
| −39.16 | 2.05 | 2.06 |
| −43.35 | 2.05 | 2.06 |