| Literature DB >> 31466215 |
Sara María Martínez-Sánchez1,2, Horacio Pérez-Sánchez3, José Antonio Gabaldón2, José Abellán-Alemán4, Silvia Montoro-García5,6.
Abstract
Food peptides contain a very wide range of diversified structures, which explains their diverse range of functional activities. Proatherogenic endothelium is related to vasoconstriction, inflammation, and oxidative stress. In this line, four synthetic bioactive peptides from dry-cured pork ham, previously identified according to their Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitory capacity and high bioavailability, were tested. Among them, KPVAAP displayed an estimated IC50 of 59.22 µM for human ACE inhibition, and docking simulations demonstrated the consistency of the noncompetitive binding with the protein. The addition of synthetic peptides to human endothelial cells significantly prevents the expression of genes related to endothelial dysfunction and inflammation (eNOS, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, IL-6) and lowers NF-κB activation (all p < 0.05). In silico dockings showed that the four bioactive peptides interact with the regulatory subunit NEMO of the NF-κB transcription factor at the same site as other characterized inhibitors (CC2-LZ region). This is the first study linking experimental and computational approaches that shows NF-κB to be the target of biopeptides of food origin. These multifunctional peptides from dry-cured pork ham make them good candidates for further research into their therapeutic or preventive use to attenuate the inflammatory atherosclerotic process.Entities:
Keywords: NF-κB; angiotensin I converting enzyme; bioactive peptides; dry-cured pork ham; endothelial dysfunction; inflammation; molecular blind docking
Year: 2019 PMID: 31466215 PMCID: PMC6747274 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20174204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides derived from dry-cured pork ham: sequence, estimated IC50 value and interaction score. Captopril (10 µM) inhibition was used to represent 100% inhibition of ACE activity under the assay conditions.
| Bioactive Peptide | Sequence | Source of Protein | IC50 (µM) | Interaction Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEPTIDE 1 (BP1) | KPVAAP | Myosin-XV | 59.22 ± 3.8 | −8.1 |
| PEPTIDE 2 (BP2) | KAAAATP | PR domain Zinc Finger Protein 2 | >1000 | −7.1 |
| PEPTIDE 3 (BP3) | KPGRP | Titin | 485.50 ± 43.47 | −8.2 |
| PEPTIDE 4 (BP4) | AAATP | PR domain Zinc Finger Protein 2 | >1000 | −7.1 |
Data from three independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SD. Specific ACE activity was expressed as µmoles of substrate HHL converted to the product HA per unit of time and normalized for protein content (units per microgram of protein).
Figure 1Depiction (in 2D) of the molecular docking between catalytic residues from the active site of ACE (PDB: 4APJ) and the bioactive peptides. (A) Peptide 1 (BP1) KPVAAP, (B) Peptide 2 (BP2) KAAAATP, (C) Peptide 3 (BP3) KPGRP, and (D) Peptide 4 (BP4) AAATP. (E) Captopril. (F) The superposition (in 3D) of BP1 (in purple) and captopril (in yellow) in stick representation. Continuous green lines represent hydrophobic interactions, while black dashed lines show hydrogen bonds. The absence of hydrophobic stabilization in the case of BP4 (D) might explain its high IC50 value. Moreover, BP2 (B) showed small hydrophobic interaction areas compared with BP1 (A) and BP3 (C), which contained voluminous hydrophobic groups.
Figure 2Relative mRNA expression of (A) ICAM-1, (B) VCAM-1, (C) IL-6, (D) eNOS in Ea.hy926 cells after treatment with 100 ng/mL TNF-α and 300 µM synthetic peptides. Data shown represent averaged values of three independent experiments. The asterisks *, **, and *** indicate statistically significant differences compared with unstimulated cells (p < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001, respectively). #, ##, or ### indicate statistically significant differences compared with stimulated cells (p < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001, respectively).
Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of ICAM-1 surface expression in inflammatory conditions measured by flow cytometry.
| ICAM-1 MFI | ||
|---|---|---|
| Control | 71.36 ± 8.31 | |
| TNFα | 1271.91 ± 158.54 | 0.0003 |
| TNFα + BP1 | 1151.37 ± 59.53 | 0.03 |
| TNFα + BP2 | 1064.42 ± 32.02 | 0.009 |
| TNFα + BP3 | 1203.01 ± 279. 89 | 0.09 |
| TNFα + BP4 | 926.01 ± 152.46 | 0.04 |
ICAM-1: Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1; VCAM-1 Vascular Adhesion Molecule-1; TNF-α: Tumor Necrosis Factor α; BP: Bioactive peptide. Data from six independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SD. TNF-α stimulated cells are compared to control conditions, and preincubations with 300 µM synthetic peptides are compared to 100 ng/mL TNF-α alone.
Figure 3Activation of NF-κB after treatment with 50 ng/mL TNF-α and 300 µM synthetic peptides. Ea.hy926 cells were transfected with NF-κB:Luc together with the pRL-CMV (10:1) reporter vectors. The normalized luciferase activity (firefly/Renilla) was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay in extracts from control, TNF-α, and synthetic peptide-treated cells. Upper and lower bars of box plots represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Median is represented as the bar inside the box plot. The data shown represent values of three independent experiments (dots). The asterisks ** indicate statistically significant differences compared with stimulated cells (p < 0.015). The BP treatment prevented TNF-α-induced proinflammatory NF-ĸB activation by 25%.
Blind docking simulation results showing the main residues involved in the interactions with the docked BP and compounds. (A) Docking to 4BWN PDB. (B) Docking to 3JSV PDB. Common residues are marked in bold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BP1 | 4BWN | ALA314A, GLU315A, GLN317A | ALA314A, ALA318A | |
| BP2 | 4BWN | ASP311A, GLN313A, ALA314A, GLU315A, GLN317A | PHE312B | |
| BP3 | 4BWN | ASP311A, GLU315A, LYS326B, GLU327B | ALA314A, LYS325A | |
| BP4 | 4BWN | ALA314A, GLN317A | ||
| iNUB | 4BWN | LYS326B, GLU327B | LYS321A, ALA323B | |
| UBI peptide | 4BWN | GLU315B, GLN317A, ARG319A, GLU320A, LYS321A, | GLN317A, ALA318A, GLU320A, LYS321A, ALA323A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BP1 | 3JSV | THR55A, SER57A, ASP58A, ASN60A | ||
| BP2 | 3JSV | ASP39A, GLY76A | PRO37A | |
| BP3 | 3JSV | LYS63B, SER65B | ||
| BP4 | 3JSV | GLU18B, LYS63B, ARG74A, ARG312D | ||
| iNUB | 3JSV | ARG312D | ALA311C, LEU315C, VAL316D, LYS319D | |
| UBI peptide | 3JSV | GLU24A, ASN25A, ASP39A, ARG42A, LEU50A, ASP52A, GLY53A, GLN62B, GLU64B | THR22A, GLU 24A, PRO38A, GLY53A, THR55A, GLU64B |
iNUB is an anthraquinone derivative (8-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydro-1-anthracenyl 2-phenylcyclopropanecarboxylate). UBI peptide: LKAQADIYKARFQAERHAREK (21 residues).
Figure 4Blind docking of the UBI peptide and BP1 in the CCL-Z2 binding domain of NEMO. (A) 4BNW without linked ubiquitins. (B) 3JSV complexed with Lys 63-linked poly-ubiquitin. The superposition of UBI peptide and BP1 (in blue) is shown. In silico docking calculations support the potential binding of the four distinct BP, which could impair IKK recruitment through competition with the Lys63-linked poly-ubiquitin.