Literature DB >> 31465545

EORTC SPECTA-AYA: A unique molecular profiling platform for adolescents and young adults with cancer in Europe.

Teresa de Rojas1, Bernd Kasper2, Winette Van der Graaf3,4, Stefan M Pfister5, Franck Bielle6, Teresa Ribalta7, Patrick Shenjere8, Matthias Preusser9, Stefan Fröhling10, Vassilis Golfinopoulos1, Marie Morfouace1, Martin G McCabe11.   

Abstract

For most adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers, age-specific molecular features are poorly understood. EORTC-SPECTA, an academic translational research infrastructure for biomaterial collection, will explicitly recruit AYA patients and will therefore collect empirical data to bridge the molecular gap between pediatric and adult oncology. The initial pilot study, activated in February 2019 across Europe, will recruit 100 AYA patients (aged 12-29 years) with newly diagnosed or relapsed high-grade gliomas and high-grade bone and soft tissue sarcomas. The primary objective of the pilot is to determine feasibility and recruitment rates. Formalin-fixed tumor tissue and whole blood from study participants will be prospectively collected with clinical data and stored centrally at the Integrated BioBank of Luxembourg. Whole exome sequencing of matched tumor and blood, and tumor RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiling will be performed at the German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. Virtual central pathology review of scanned diagnostic slides will be undertaken by an international expert panel, and diagnostic material returned to the participating centers. A multidisciplinary molecular tumor board will release a clinically validated report to referring clinicians within 4-6 weeks after biopsy. SPECTA-AYA constitutes a major opportunity to gain knowledge about the tumor biology of this unique age group. It incorporates notable innovative aspects: AYA specificity, pan-European academic collaboration, centralized biobanking, comprehensive molecular profiling and virtual central pathology review, among others. SPECTA-AYA will help untangle the tumor particularities of AYAs with cancer and aims to improve their access to novel drugs and personalized medicine.
© 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents and young adults; high grade glioma; molecular profiling; personalized medicine; sarcoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31465545      PMCID: PMC7383917          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


Introduction: Research in Context

In Europe, over 66,000 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 15–39 are diagnosed annually with cancer, from an estimated AYA population of just over 50 million.1 All cancers are rare in this age group: either rare in absolute terms or rare examples of common cancers occurring outside of the usual age range. Overall survival across the age cohort exceeds 80% at 5 years; however, among 15–24 years aged AYAs, cancer is the leading disease‐related cause of death with at least 2,000 deaths annually. For some of the more common cancer diagnoses among AYAs such as acute leukemia, certain high‐grade gliomas and bone and soft tissue sarcoma, AYA outcomes are worse than for children with the same cancers,2 and there has been little progress in improving survival figures. The molecular era brings hope of survival improvement for these historically treatment‐resistant malignancies, but greater understanding of both cancer and patient biology will be needed to achieve that improvement.1, 3, 4 There is evidence, from some of the most comprehensively studied cancers that occur throughout this age group, that the frequency of specific molecular features changes significantly with age: BCR‐ABL1 positivity is more common and good‐risk molecular features, such as high hyperdiploidy and ETV6RUNX1 fusions, less common in the AYA population with acute lymphoblastic leukemia than in children; Sonic‐Hedgehog (SHH) subgroup medulloblastomas account for a larger proportion of adults with medulloblastoma and SHH pathway mutations are more likely to occur upstream in the pathway than in children and childhood glioblastoma is more likely to involve H3F3A mutations and less likely to involve TERT mutations than in adults. For most AYA cancers, however, age‐specific molecular features are poorly understood.5 The role of germline predisposition is well described in pediatric cancers and in some young adult populations such as women with early onset breast cancer.6 Such mutations are most likely to be relevant for young patients. While there has been increasing recognition of previously undiagnosed cancer predisposition syndromes in young children, detailed reports of clinical phenotype in patients with well‐described clinical entities such as the neurofibromatoses (NF1 or NF2 mutation) and Li–Fraumeni syndrome (TP53 mutation),7 the prevalence of predisposing germline mutations in AYA cancer is unknown. Several large‐scale genomic profiling initiatives are underway across Europe for childhood and adult cancers (e.g., the INFORM, MASTER, MAPPYACTS, SPECTA platforms), either for molecular screening for specific clinical trials or as stand‐alone enterprises.8, 9, 10 These initiatives share the common aims of understanding individual molecular drivers of tumorigenesis and predicting response to treatment. However, none have been designed specifically to recruit AYA patients and, therefore, recruitment of AYA patients to these initiatives is likely to be fragmentary. In general, clinical trial recruitment rates of AYAs are poor, both for early and late‐phase trials; a situation that multi‐stakeholder initiatives such as the ACCELERATE platform are advocating to overturn.11, 12 Most clinical trials are designed to study either children or adults, have arbitrarily defined age eligibility criteria and directly or indirectly exclude many AYA patients.13 Such trials tend to recruit poorly from the AYA population.12 Since the majority of modern‐era early and late‐phase trials include biological study components, failure to recruit AYA patients to trials also results in their biology being relatively understudied compared to their “child” or “adult” counterparts. For this reason, SPECTA will explicitly recruit AYA patients and will therefore collect empirical data to bridge the molecular gap between pediatric and adult oncology. Because SPECTA will analyze tumor and germline DNA (to assess if the mutation is hereditary or somatic), this project will describe the frequency of specific cancer‐causing germline mutations across the spectrum of AYA cancers. This may be of particular interest among the population of young patients who develop cancers typically found in older adult populations. The initial pilot study, activated in February 2019, will be composed of 100 AYA patients with high‐grade gliomas and high‐grade bone and soft tissue sarcomas, the two cancer groups responsible for most deaths in this age group. The primary objective of the pilot is to determine feasibility and recruitment rates of eligible AYA cancer patients who consent to genetic analysis of their tumor and constitutional DNA.

Methods: Study Design and Workflow

SPECTA is a collaborative, pan‐European translational research infrastructure that enables biomaterial collection for patients treated in clinical trials or per standard of care. In SPECTA‐AYA, patients aged between 12 and 29 years with newly diagnosed, or any relapsed high‐grade glioma, including cases with malignant progression from lower‐grade tumors, and nongrade 1 bone or soft tissue sarcoma will be recruited. Formalin‐fixed tumor tissue and whole blood from study participants will be prospectively collected with clinical data. The SPECTA‐AYA project is being carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). All procedures are and will be performed in compliance with the laws and regulations of each participating country, and the appropriate institutional ethics committee(s) have approved them as required by the applicable national legislation. Informed consent and assent is being obtained for all patients or legal representatives according to the age and to the legal requirements of each country. Particular attention is given in the information sheets and informed consent forms to the implications of genetic testing, especially in regard to profiling of the germline and to the management of incidental findings. Funds from the global EORTC‐SPECTA were allocated to this initial pilot project. As for the expanded cohorts foreseen to be started in SPECTA‐AYA after this pilot, we believe the prospect of securing funding to be fairly good, given the growing interest by multi‐stakeholder platforms to invest in precision medicine initiatives, especially for rare cancers. The study workflow is shown in Figure 1. The biological samples will be stored centrally and nucleic acids extracted at the Integrated BioBank of Luxembourg (IBBL). Whole exome sequencing (WES) of matched tumor and blood, and tumor RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiling (EIPC array, Illumina) will be performed at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg. The genomic data will be deposited on the European Genome‐Phenome Archive.14 Virtual central pathology review of scanned diagnostic slides will be undertaken by an international expert panel, and diagnostic material returned to the participating centers. A multidisciplinary molecular tumor board, held monthly, will release a clinically validated report that we aim to be available to referring clinicians within 4 to 6 weeks after biopsy. Leftover material from the collected formalin‐fixed tumor tissue and blood will be stored for future research.
Figure 1

Study workflow.

Study workflow.

Discussion: Innovative Aspects

SPECTA‐AYA is an ambitious, European collaborative project that includes several innovative aspects, which ought to be highlighted. While there are several ongoing molecular profiling initiatives across Europe for children and adults with cancer, SPECTA‐AYA is the first comprehensive, international platform specifically targeted to AYA patients. AYAs with cancer constitute a unique age group with distinct features regarding epidemiology, tumor biology, inclusion rates into clinical trials, clinical outcomes and psychosocial setting.5, 15, 16, 17 SPECTA‐AYA will help decipher the tumor peculiarities of this group of patients and aims to improve their access to novel drugs and personalized medicine. Scarcity of available tumor material and a preponderance of formalin‐fixed over frozen tissue are recognized to be major challenges of translational research18 in rare populations such as this study population. Collection and storage of frozen tissue is increasing with time for childhood cancers and is viewed as standard of care in some countries, but it is not the norm for AYA patients in general or for the histologies included in SPECTA‐AYA specifically. To understand better the biology of AYA cancers, in this study, we aim to utilize nucleic acids from blood and from the paraffin‐embedded tissue almost universally available from diagnostic biopsies to generate a complete molecular profile for each patient. RNA sequencing, where quality permits, will be used to identify gene fusions and gene expression, WES will identify numerical and sequence variants, tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability calculation and, finally, methylation array will be used to validate the tumor classification19, 20, 21 and inform copy number variations. Germline DNA will be used as control for WES and to assess predisposition syndromes, as described in Reference 22. Finally, circulating tumor DNA will also be extracted from blood samples and stored for future research. Another hurdle in this rare patient population is the need for central pathology review. In SPECTA‐AYA, a virtual pathology review platform has been developed. After patient registration, diagnostic slides (H&E and selected stainings) will be sent to IBBL, scanned at 40× magnification and uploaded onto the telepathology platform AGOKO23 with associated clinical data. Immunostained slides will be returned to the recruiting site. An international panel of expert pathologists will review each case and make a consensus pathological diagnosis according to an agreed minimal histopathological and immunohistochemical marker set. Additional stains, if required, will be performed at a central laboratory. A comparison with the methylation classifier20 will also be performed and will contribute to the agreed final diagnosis. A certain degree of overlap in the molecular analyses performed locally as part of initial diagnosis can be expected and may be instructive, as for instance, some molecular features tested by immunohistochemistry in the local pathology laboratory can be corroborated by the techniques applied in SPECTA‐AYA centrally, enhancing the power of the central pathology review. This can prove particularly relevant in this setting of rare tumors, in which the pathology diagnosis is frequently challenging. The molecular tumor board will include expert pathologists, molecular biologists and clinicians, including the recruiting clinician, and will take place monthly, an approach that has been shown to be feasible in cancer networks.8, 10, 24 The final report released to the recruiting center will include an agreed clinical, pathological and molecular diagnosis, a rationale for molecularly targeted treatments where appropriate, and suggestions for clinical trial inclusion if available. Germline mutations, if any, and relevant incidental findings are included as well. Additionally, the clinician (on behalf of the patient and family) can request the comprehensive sequencing raw data. The SPECTA infrastructure also allows for long‐term follow‐up and collection of additional clinical data including patient‐reported and neurocognitive outcomes. Such variables have not been selected for the AYA pilot project, but could be easily added in a follow‐up cohort. The pan‐European nature of the project, the comprehensive molecular analysis, and the virtual central pathology review process combine into a complex workflow (Fig. 1) with subsequent operational challenges. The collaboration between three major academic cancer research organizations in Europe—the UK National Cancer Research Institute, EORTC and DKFZ—has been a major facilitator in mastering these challenges. Furthermore, while decentralized storage greatly reduces the chances of prompt and reliable translational research, the involvement of IBBL as a centralized solution with shared standard operating procedures to ensure best practice in biomaterial and clinical data collection is a key strength of SPECTA. The collaboration with DKFZ ensures that the latest genomic analysis and bioinformatic assessment will be performed during the course of the project. Finally, data and sample sharing policies are already in place at EORTC to promote academic collaboration and research, especially needed in the field of rare cancers. It is therefore EORTC's policy to consider for sharing all data generated from its research while safeguarding intellectual property, the privacy of patients and confidentiality.25 This is done upon request from qualified scientific and medical researchers, for reanalysis and other research purposes. EORTC complies with the OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding and with the National Institutes of Health Final Statement on Sharing Research Data released on February 26, 2003; it is committed to do so within the limits needed to guarantee the protection of personal data in accordance with the EU data protection rules and other applicable European legislation.

Conclusions/Output

SPECTA‐AYA constitutes a major opportunity to gain knowledge about the tumor biology of this unique age group. It incorporates notable innovative aspects: AYA specificity, pan‐European academic collaboration, centralized biobanking, comprehensive molecular profiling and virtual central pathology review, among others. We believe that the expected challenges can be overcome with strong collaborative efforts, notably between adult and pediatric oncology, such as the DKFZ–EORTC partnership. SPECTA‐AYA will help untangle the tumor particularities of AYAs with cancer and, in the longer term, aims to improve their access to novel drugs and personalized medicine.
  21 in total

1.  Molecular Screening for Cancer Treatment Optimization (MOSCATO-01) in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Institutional Prospective Molecular Stratification Trial.

Authors:  Anne C Harttrampf; Ludovic Lacroix; Marc Deloger; Frederic Deschamps; Stephanie Puget; Nathalie Auger; Philippe Vielh; Pascale Varlet; Zsofia Balogh; Samuel Abbou; Adrien Allorant; Dominique Valteau-Couanet; Sabine Sarnacki; Louise Gamiche-Rolland; Guillaume Meurice; Veronique Minard-Colin; Jacques Grill; Laurence Brugieres; Christelle Dufour; Nathalie Gaspar; Stefan Michiels; Gilles Vassal; Jean-Charles Soria; Birgit Geoerger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Next-generation personalised medicine for high-risk paediatric cancer patients - The INFORM pilot study.

Authors:  Barbara C Worst; Cornelis M van Tilburg; Gnana Prakash Balasubramanian; Petra Fiesel; Ruth Witt; Angelika Freitag; Miream Boudalil; Christopher Previti; Stephan Wolf; Sabine Schmidt; Sasithorn Chotewutmontri; Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler; Matthias Schick; Matthias Schlesner; Barbara Hutter; Lenka Taylor; Tobias Borst; Christian Sutter; Claus R Bartram; Till Milde; Elke Pfaff; Andreas E Kulozik; Arend von Stackelberg; Roland Meisel; Arndt Borkhardt; Dirk Reinhardt; Jan-Henning Klusmann; Gudrun Fleischhack; Stephan Tippelt; Uta Dirksen; Heribert Jürgens; Christof M Kramm; Andre O von Bueren; Frank Westermann; Matthias Fischer; Birgit Burkhardt; Wilhelm Wößmann; Michaela Nathrath; Stefan S Bielack; Michael C Frühwald; Simone Fulda; Thomas Klingebiel; Ewa Koscielniak; Matthias Schwab; Roman Tremmel; Pablo Hernáiz Driever; Johannes H Schulte; Benedikt Brors; Andreas von Deimling; Peter Lichter; Angelika Eggert; David Capper; Stefan M Pfister; David T W Jones; Olaf Witt
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Disparity in Outcomes for Adolescent and Young Adult Patients Diagnosed With Pediatric Solid Tumors Across 4 Decades.

Authors:  Ishita Chen; Dario Pasalic; Benjamin Fischer-Valuck; Haydar Frangoul; Todd DeWees; Eric T Shinohara; Stephanie M Perkins
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.339

4.  Revisiting Li-Fraumeni Syndrome From TP53 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Gaëlle Bougeard; Mariette Renaux-Petel; Jean-Michel Flaman; Camille Charbonnier; Pierre Fermey; Muriel Belotti; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Emilie Consolino; Laurence Brugières; Olivier Caron; Patrick R Benusiglio; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Valérie Bonadona; Catherine Bonaïti-Pellié; Julie Tinat; Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont; Thierry Frebourg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Biological material collection to advance translational research and treatment of children with CNS tumours: position paper from the SIOPE Brain Tumour Group.

Authors:  Stefan Rutkowski; Piergiorgio Modena; Daniel Williamson; Kornelius Kerl; Karsten Nysom; Barry Pizer; Ute Bartels; Stephanie Puget; François Doz; Antony Michalski; Katja von Hoff; Mathilde Chevignard; Shivaram Avula; Matthew J Murray; Stefan Schönberger; Thomas Czech; Antoinette Y N Schouten-van Meeteren; Uwe Kordes; Christof M Kramm; Dannis G van Vuurden; Esther Hulleman; Geert O Janssens; Guirish A Solanki; Marie-Luise C van Veelen; Ulrich Thomale; Martin U Schuhmann; Chris Jones; Felice Giangaspero; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Torsten Pietsch; Steve C Clifford; Stefan M Pfister; Stefaan W Van Gool
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Clinical application of genomic profiling to find druggable targets for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients with metastasis.

Authors:  Soojin Cha; Jeongeun Lee; Jong-Yeon Shin; Ji-Yeon Kim; Sung Hoon Sim; Bhumsuk Keam; Tae Min Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Se-Hoon Lee; Jong-Il Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours.

Authors:  David Capper; David T W Jones; Martin Sill; Volker Hovestadt; Daniel Schrimpf; Dominik Sturm; Christian Koelsche; Felix Sahm; Lukas Chavez; David E Reuss; Annekathrin Kratz; Annika K Wefers; Kristin Huang; Kristian W Pajtler; Leonille Schweizer; Damian Stichel; Adriana Olar; Nils W Engel; Kerstin Lindenberg; Patrick N Harter; Anne K Braczynski; Karl H Plate; Hildegard Dohmen; Boyan K Garvalov; Roland Coras; Annett Hölsken; Ekkehard Hewer; Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler; Matthias Schick; Roger Fischer; Rudi Beschorner; Jens Schittenhelm; Ori Staszewski; Khalida Wani; Pascale Varlet; Melanie Pages; Petra Temming; Dietmar Lohmann; Florian Selt; Hendrik Witt; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Eleonora Aronica; Felice Giangaspero; Elisabeth Rushing; Wolfram Scheurlen; Christoph Geisenberger; Fausto J Rodriguez; Albert Becker; Matthias Preusser; Christine Haberler; Rolf Bjerkvig; Jane Cryan; Michael Farrell; Martina Deckert; Jürgen Hench; Stephan Frank; Jonathan Serrano; Kasthuri Kannan; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Wolfgang Brück; Silvia Hofer; Stefanie Brehmer; Marcel Seiz-Rosenhagen; Daniel Hänggi; Volkmar Hans; Stephanie Rozsnoki; Jordan R Hansford; Patricia Kohlhof; Bjarne W Kristensen; Matt Lechner; Beatriz Lopes; Christian Mawrin; Ralf Ketter; Andreas Kulozik; Ziad Khatib; Frank Heppner; Arend Koch; Anne Jouvet; Catherine Keohane; Helmut Mühleisen; Wolf Mueller; Ute Pohl; Marco Prinz; Axel Benner; Marc Zapatka; Nicholas G Gottardo; Pablo Hernáiz Driever; Christof M Kramm; Hermann L Müller; Stefan Rutkowski; Katja von Hoff; Michael C Frühwald; Astrid Gnekow; Gudrun Fleischhack; Stephan Tippelt; Gabriele Calaminus; Camelia-Maria Monoranu; Arie Perry; Chris Jones; Thomas S Jacques; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Marco Gessi; Torsten Pietsch; Johannes Schramm; Gabriele Schackert; Manfred Westphal; Guido Reifenberger; Pieter Wesseling; Michael Weller; Vincent Peter Collins; Ingmar Blümcke; Martin Bendszus; Jürgen Debus; Annie Huang; Nada Jabado; Paul A Northcott; Werner Paulus; Amar Gajjar; Giles W Robinson; Michael D Taylor; Zane Jaunmuktane; Marina Ryzhova; Michael Platten; Andreas Unterberg; Wolfgang Wick; Matthias A Karajannis; Michel Mittelbronn; Till Acker; Christian Hartmann; Kenneth Aldape; Ulrich Schüller; Rolf Buslei; Peter Lichter; Marcel Kool; Christel Herold-Mende; David W Ellison; Martin Hasselblatt; Matija Snuderl; Sebastian Brandner; Andrey Korshunov; Andreas von Deimling; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Management of young women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Poggio; Matteo Lambertini; Claudia Bighin; Benedetta Conte; Eva Blondeaux; Alessia D'Alonzo; Chiara Dellepiane; Francesco Boccardo; Lucia Del Mastro
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-11-14

9.  Clinical outcomes of adolescents and young adults with advanced solid tumours participating in phase I trials.

Authors:  Raghav Sundar; Terri McVeigh; David Dolling; Ann Petruckevitch; Nikolaos Diamantis; Joo Ern Ang; Maxime Chenard-Poiriér; Dearbhaile Collins; Joline Lim; Malaka Ameratunga; Khurum Khan; Stan B Kaye; Udai Banerji; Juanita Lopez; Angela J George; Johann S de Bono; Winette T van der Graaf
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Spectrum and prevalence of genetic predisposition in medulloblastoma: a retrospective genetic study and prospective validation in a clinical trial cohort.

Authors:  Sebastian M Waszak; Paul A Northcott; Ivo Buchhalter; Giles W Robinson; Christian Sutter; Susanne Groebner; Kerstin B Grund; Laurence Brugières; David T W Jones; Kristian W Pajtler; A Sorana Morrissy; Marcel Kool; Dominik Sturm; Lukas Chavez; Aurelie Ernst; Sebastian Brabetz; Michael Hain; Thomas Zichner; Maia Segura-Wang; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Tobias Rausch; Balca R Mardin; Xin Zhou; Cristina Baciu; Christian Lawerenz; Jennifer A Chan; Pascale Varlet; Lea Guerrini-Rousseau; Daniel W Fults; Wiesława Grajkowska; Peter Hauser; Nada Jabado; Young-Shin Ra; Karel Zitterbart; Suyash S Shringarpure; Francisco M De La Vega; Carlos D Bustamante; Ho-Keung Ng; Arie Perry; Tobey J MacDonald; Pablo Hernáiz Driever; Anne E Bendel; Daniel C Bowers; Geoffrey McCowage; Murali M Chintagumpala; Richard Cohn; Timothy Hassall; Gudrun Fleischhack; Tone Eggen; Finn Wesenberg; Maria Feychting; Birgitta Lannering; Joachim Schüz; Christoffer Johansen; Tina V Andersen; Martin Röösli; Claudia E Kuehni; Michael Grotzer; Kristina Kjaerheim; Camelia M Monoranu; Tenley C Archer; Elizabeth Duke; Scott L Pomeroy; Redmond Shelagh; Stephan Frank; David Sumerauer; Wolfram Scheurlen; Marina V Ryzhova; Till Milde; Christian P Kratz; David Samuel; Jinghui Zhang; David A Solomon; Marco Marra; Roland Eils; Claus R Bartram; Katja von Hoff; Stefan Rutkowski; Vijay Ramaswamy; Richard J Gilbertson; Andrey Korshunov; Michael D Taylor; Peter Lichter; David Malkin; Amar Gajjar; Jan O Korbel; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 54.433

View more
  3 in total

1.  Use of Communication Technology to Improve Clinical Trial Participation in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Consensus Statement From the Children's Oncology Group Adolescent and Young Adult Responsible Investigator Network.

Authors:  Viswatej Avutu; Varun Monga; Nupur Mittal; Aniket Saha; Jeffrey R Andolina; Danielle E Bell; Douglas B Fair; Jamie E Flerlage; Jamie N Frediani; Jessica L Heath; Justine M Kahn; Jennifer L Reichek; Leanne Super; Michael A Terao; David R Freyer; Michael E Roth
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-12-14

Review 2.  Prognostic factors related to overall survival in adolescent and young adults with medulloblastoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Han Yan; Veda Zabih; Ute Bartels; Sunit Das; Paul Nathan; Sumit Gupta
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-02-09

3.  Shared barriers and facilitators to enrollment of adolescents and young adults on cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Nupur Mittal; Aniket Saha; Viswatej Avutu; Varun Monga; David R Freyer; Michael Roth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.