Literature DB >> 31465485

Prenatal antibiotics exposure and the risk of autism spectrum disorders: A population-based cohort study.

Amani F Hamad1, Silvia Alessi-Severini1,2, Salaheddin M Mahmud1,3,4, Marni Brownell2,3, I Fan Kuo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prenatal antibiotic exposure induces changes in infants' gut microbiota composition and is suggested as a possible contributor in the development of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In this study, we examined the association between prenatal antibiotic exposure and the risk of ASD.
METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study utilizing the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository. The cohort included 214 834 children born in Manitoba, Canada between April 1, 1998 and March 31, 2016. Exposure was defined as having filled one or more antibiotic prescription during pregnancy. The outcome was autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the risk of developing ASD in the overall cohort and in a sibling cohort.
RESULTS: Of all subjects, 80 750 (37.6%) were exposed to antibiotics prenatally. During follow-up, 2965 children received an ASD diagnosis. Compared to children who were not exposed to antibiotics prenatally, those who were exposed had a higher risk of ASD: (adjusted HR 1.10 [95% CI 1.01, 1.19]). The association was observed in those exposed to antibiotics in the second or third trimester (HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.01, 1.23] and 1.17 [95% CI 1.06, 1.30], respectively). In the siblings' cohort, ASD risk estimate remained unchanged (adjusted HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.90, 1.30], although it was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal antibiotic exposure is associated with a small increase in the risk of ASD. Given the potential of residual confounding beyond what it was controlled through our study design and because of possible confounding by indication, such a small risk increase in the population is not expected to be clinically significant.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31465485      PMCID: PMC6715235          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are characterized by impairment in social communication and interaction with repetitive patterns of behavior [1]. The burden of ASD is significant with 62 million cases worldwide [2]. Genetics are primary contributors to the development of ASD; however, the increasing prevalence of ASD suggests a role of environmental factors [3-7]. Abnormal composition of microbiota, the community of microorganisms residing in the human body, has been observed in children with ASD and is proposed as a contributor to ASD development [8-11]. Recent research have shown that the fetal gut is not germ free and suggests maternal microbiota transfer before birth [12, 13]. Antibiotic-altered microbiota administered to pregnant mice demonstrated transmission of the same alteration of microorganisms to the offspring. Despite absence of direct exposure to antibiotics, the offspring maintained this microbial composition for at least 21 weeks and were found to be at higher risk of developing colitis [14]. In another study, treating pregnant mice with antibiotics directly resulted in persistent reduction in offspring gut microbiota diversity and in immunological alterations [15]. Antibiotic-induced changes in fetal microbiota composition can disrupt the gut-brain axis, potentially impairing neurodevelopment and increasing the risk of ASD [8, 9, 16]. Although previous observational studies reported several prenatal and postnatal environmental factors as predictors of ASD [17-19], potential of confounding and other study flaws limited the clinical applicability of these associations. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between prenatal antibiotic exposure and the risk of ASD. Antibiotics over-prescription and inappropriate use are often observed during pregnancy [20-22]. Given the high frequency of antibiotic prescribing in this population [20, 23], identifying an association between antibiotic use and ASD, if any, would be of public health interest.

Methods

Design and subjects

This was a population-based cohort study utilizing administrative health data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. The Repository is a collection of administrative, registry, survey and other data that come from different provincial government departments such as health, education and justice. Under a universal, provincial health delivery system, the Repository captures all encounters by all residents with the healthcare system including physician visits and drug dispensation, collected for claim purposes. Patient records in the Repository are de-identified. Scrambled Personal Health Identification Numbers (PHIN) are used for linkage among different databases. The cohort consisted of all live births identified in the Manitoba Health Insurance Registry between April 1, 1998 and March 31, 2016. Children were required to have continuous enrollment with Manitoba Health for at least 18 months after their birthdate, which was also the cohort index date, to ensure that they have met the minimum age of ASD diagnosis [24]. In addition, to obtain data on maternal covariates, the mothers were required to have at least two years of Manitoba Health enrollment prior to index date. Children were followed until a diagnosis of ASD, migration out of province, 18th birthday, death or end of study period (March 31, 2016), whichever occurred first. Subjects with missing data on any of the relevant covariates were excluded from the cohort. To account for unmeasured familial environmental and genetic confounders that are shared between siblings, we identified a cohort of maternal siblings who have different exposure status to prenatal antibiotics, i.e., one or more of the siblings were exposed to antibiotics prenatally and one or more were not. Other data sources of the study included the Drug Program Information Network (DPIN), In-hospital Pharmaceuticals, Hospital Abstracts, physician claims from the Medical Services database, the Manitoba Education and Training Special Needs Funding data, the Hospital Newborn to Mother Link Registry, BabyFirst—Families First Screen and the Social Allowances Management Information Network (SAMIN) (S1 Table). The study was approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board and the Health Information Privacy Committee of Manitoba Health, Seniors and Active Living.

Exposure

The exposure was identified in the Drug Program Information Network (DPIN), a record of outpatient drug dispensations, and was defined as having filled one or more antibiotic prescriptions during pregnancy (S2 Table). The first day of pregnancy was estimated as the difference between birth date and gestational age. Gestational age is approximated from the first date of women’s last menstrual period and is identified in the Hospital Newborn to Mother Link Registry. In secondary analyses, the exposure was examined based on the pregnancy trimester, number of antibiotic courses received, cumulative duration and class of antibiotic. Grouping of these variables was based on their frequency in the cohort.

Outcome

The primary outcome was ASD diagnosis after 18 months of age and included childhood autism, atypical autism, Asperger’s disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, other pervasive developmental disorders and pervasive developmental disorders not otherwise specified [1]. The 9th and 10th revisions of the International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding system were used to identify ASD diagnosis. ASD was defined as one or more hospitalization with an ASD code (ICD-9 299.0, 299.1, 299.8 or 299.9, or ICD-10 F84.0, F84.1, F84.3, F84.5, F84.8 or F84.9), one or more physician visit with ASD code (ICD-9 code of 299) or presence of an "ASD" identifier in the Manitoba Education and Training Special Needs Funding data [7, 25, 26]. A validation study reported a positive predictive value of 88% using one or more hospitalizations or physician visits [27]. Including educational data as a source to identify ASD is expected to increase the sensitivity [28].

Covariates

The models were adjusted for region of residence (urban or rural), socioeconomic status (SES), mothers’ age at delivery (less than 30, 30 to 39, and 40 years or greater), prenatal use of medications and maternal medical conditions of interest (S3 and S4 Tables). SES was measured using the Socio-Economic Factor Index (SEFI), an area level measure derived from Census data. In addition, receiving income assistance was explored as a proxy of individual level SES. Data on prenatal smoking, alcohol or drug use were obtained from the BabyFirst—Families First Screen. A large amount of missing data was observed for these variables; accordingly, they were not included in the main analysis but were explored in a sensitivity analysis restricted to children who had data on these variables. Number of mothers’ physician visits in the year prior to pregnancy was included as a measure of healthcare access. Indication of the dispensed antibiotic is not reliably captured in the administrative databases; hence, we were not able to account for the specific indication for which the antibiotics were prescribed. The models were also adjusted for child covariates including sex, size for gestational age, mode of delivery, birth complications, breast feeding initiation, multiple births, birth order (first born or subsequent), season of birth, year of birth, early childhood antibiotics use and medical conditions of interest (S4 Table).

Statistical analysis

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between antibiotic exposure and ASD diagnosis. To account for correlation among siblings, regression models were stratified by the mothers to examine this association within the sibling cohort. The analysis was stratified by sex and region to examine potential effect modification. Multicollinearity among covariates and interactions with antibiotic exposure were explored. Proportional hazards assumption was tested by examining the correlation between follow-up time and Schoenfeld residuals of the independent variables. In the planned sensitivity analyses, we restricted the cohort to children whose mothers had an ICD code for infection during pregnancy. We applied a stricter ASD identification algorithm, which required one hospitalization or two physician claims within three years or one physician claim plus educational special needs funding for ASD within three years. We varied the minimum age for ASD diagnosis to one and two years old, we included inpatient antibiotic use in identifying the exposure and we included prenatal smoking, alcohol or drug use. In addition, we conducted two negative-control analyses by examining maternal antibiotic exposure in the year before pregnancy and the year after birth. The statistical software SAS® 9.4 (SAS Institute; Cary, NC) was used for all data analyses.

Results

Description of study population

A total of 214 834 children met the inclusion criteria (Fig 1). About 51% were males and 54.4% resided in an urban region (Table 1); 37.6% of the children were exposed to antibiotics prenatally. The majority were exposed to one antibiotic course (62.8%) or were exposed for less than or equal to two weeks (74.1%). 54.6% were exposed to a penicillin antibiotic (S5 Table).
Fig 1

Study populations: Overall and sibling cohort.

Table 1

Characteristics of study cohort: Overall and by antibiotic exposure status.

Characteristic: No (%) aAll subjectsN = 214 834Antibiotic use during pregnancy
NON = 134 084YESN = 80 750
Male110 107 (51.3)68 691 (51.2)41 416 (51.3)
Urban region116 865 (54.4)74 887 (55.9)41 978 (52.0)
Socioeconomic status (SES)b:
    High    Middle    Low-mid    Low21 212 (9.9)77 708 (36.2)67 059 (31.2)48 855 (22.7)14 912 (11.1)50 861 (37.9)40 410 (30.1)27 901 (20.8)6 300 (7.8)26 847 (33.3)26 649 (33.0)20 954 (26.0)
Receipt of income assistance c37 158 (17.3)17 058 (12.7)20 100 (24.9)
Mothers age at delivery:
    < 30    30–39    > = 40128 229 (59.7)81 963 (38.2)4 642 (2.2)76 411 (57.0)54 602 (40.7)3 071 (2.3)51 818 (64.2)27 361 (33.9)1 571 (2.0)
Breastfeeding initiation d172 952 (80.8)110 425 (82.7)62 527 (77.7)
Multiple birth e5 383 (2.5)3 246 (2.4)2 137 (2.7)
Caesarian section delivery43 782 (20.4)26 810 (20.0)16 972 (21.0)
Birth complications21 022 (9.8)13 092 (9.8)7 930 (9.8)
First born child80 758 (37.6)52 334 (39.0)28 424 (35.2)
Small for gestational age f16 507 (7.7)10 445 (7.8)6 062 (7.5)
Prenatal alcohol/drug use g12 959 (12.3)7 265 (10.9)5 694 (14.7)
Prenatal smoking h20 844 (19.4)10 687 (15.8)10 157 (25.7)
Childhood medical conditions:
    Infections:
      None      Mild-moderate i      Severe j    Epilepsy    Neonatal jaundice    Other developmental disabilities    Asthma67 430 (31.4)134 794 (62.7)12 610 (5.9)1 056 (0.5)20 517 (9.6)859 (0.4)26 641 (12.4)48 169 (35.9)78 881 (58.8)7 034 (5.3)589 (0.4)11 934 (8.9)489 (0.4)13 522 (10.1)19 261 (23.9)55 913 (69.2)5 576 (6.9)467 (0.6)8 583 (10.6)370 (0.5)13 119 (16.3)
Early life antibiotics exposure k94 024 (43.8)51 524 (38.4)42 500 (52.6)
Maternal medical conditions:
    Mood and anxiety disorders    Schizophrenia    Diabetes    Infections15 885 (7.4)196 (0.1)6 085 (2.8)67 559 (31.5)7 493 (5.6)87 (0.1)3 268 (2.4)22 214 (16.6)8 392 (10.4)109 (0.1)2 817 (3.5)45 345 (56.2)
Prenatal medications use:
    Antidepressants    Antipsychotics    Anticonvulsants    Cardiovascular medications5 759 (2.7)613 (0.3)1 282 (0.6)3 370 (1.6)2 773 (2.1)236 (0.2)552 (0.4)1 887 (1.4)2 986 (3.7)377 (0.5)730 (0.9)1 483 (1.8)
Year of birth:
    1998–2001    2002–2005    2006–2009    2010–201447 107 (21.9)48 596 (22.6)53 052 (24.7)66 079 (30.8)28 817 (21.5)30 789 (23.0)33 269 (24.8)41 209 (30.7)18 290 (22.7)17 807 (22.1)19 783 (24.5)24 870 (30.8)
Season of birth:
    Winter    spring    Summer    Fall49 039 (22.8)56 517 (26.3)58 987 (27.5)50 291 (23.4)30 678 (22.9)34 935 (26.1)36 831 (27.5)31 640 (23.6)18 361 (22.7)21 582 (26.7)22 156 (27.4)18 651 (23.1)

a Numbers (percentage). Percentages are calculated based on non-missing data

b SEFI was categorized with cut off points within one standard deviation from the mean into high, middle, low middle and low SES

c Defined as receiving income assistance for at least two months within 1 year before to 18 months after index date

d Missing data for 886 (0.4%) subjects

e Defined as the number of births following a multiple gestation pregnancy

f Defined as having birth weight below the 10th percentile for the gestational age and sex. Missing data for 502 (0.2%) subjects

g Missing data for 109 491 (51.0%) subjects

h Missing data for 107 550 (50.1%) subjects

i Defined as having an infection code in physician claims only

j Defined as having a hospitalization with an infection code

k Defined as filling one or more antibiotic prescription during the first year of life

a Numbers (percentage). Percentages are calculated based on non-missing data b SEFI was categorized with cut off points within one standard deviation from the mean into high, middle, low middle and low SES c Defined as receiving income assistance for at least two months within 1 year before to 18 months after index date d Missing data for 886 (0.4%) subjects e Defined as the number of births following a multiple gestation pregnancy f Defined as having birth weight below the 10th percentile for the gestational age and sex. Missing data for 502 (0.2%) subjects g Missing data for 109 491 (51.0%) subjects h Missing data for 107 550 (50.1%) subjects i Defined as having an infection code in physician claims only j Defined as having a hospitalization with an infection code k Defined as filling one or more antibiotic prescription during the first year of life During a follow-up of 1 943 612 person-years with a median of 8.6 person-years (Interquartile range 4.8–13.2), 2965 children received an ASD diagnosis. The crude incidence rates for ASD diagnosis were 1.62 per 1000 person-years and 1.47 per 1000 person-years in children exposed and unexposed to antibiotics prenatally, respectively. The sibling cohort included 75 896 subjects, with 53 840 exposure discordant pairs (Fig 1). In this cohort, 977 subjects developed ASD during a median follow up of 9.0 person-years (Interquartile range 5.5–12.9). Baseline characteristics of the sibling cohort are further described in S6 Table.

Cox regression models

Prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with a small increase in ASD risk (HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.03, 1.19]). After adjusting for covariates (Table 2), the risk estimates remained unchanged (HR 1.10 [95% CI 1.01, 1.19]). An interaction between antibiotics use and region was statistically significant (p-value = 0.02). The association with ASD risk was statistically significant in children residing in rural regions (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.08, 1.44]), but not in those residing in urban regions (HR 1.02 [95% CI 0.92, 1.13]). In secondary analyses, statistically significant association was observed for those exposed to antibiotics in the second or third trimester (HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.01, 1.23] and 1.17 [95% CI 1.06, 1.30], respectively) or those exposed to penicillins or another beta-lactam (HR 1.13 [95% CI 1.04, 1.24] and 1.18 [95% CI 1.03, 1.37]), respectively). Analysis based on cumulative duration of antibiotic exposure showed a dose response effect, with the highest risk observed in those exposed to antibiotics for longer than 14 days (HR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01, 1.30]). In the sibling cohort, prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with a small, non-statistically significant increase in the risk of ASD (HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.90, 1.30]). No substantial variation in the risk association was observed in all secondary analyses (Table 3).
Table 2

Association between antibiotic exposure and risk of ASD in the overall cohort.

VariablePerson-yearsNumber of eventsHR [95% CI]
UnadjustedAdjusted a
Main analysis
    Prenatal antibiotic exposure1 943 6122 9651.11 [1.03 , 1.19]**1.10 [1.01 , 1.19]*
    Stratified by sex:
        Male991 9392 4011.11 [1.02 , 1.20]*1.12 [1.02 , 1.22]*
        Female951 6735641.10 [0.93 , 1.30]1.01 [0.84 , 1.23]
    Stratified by region:
        Rural887 4979531.28 [1.13 , 1.46]***1.25 [1.08 , 1.44]**
        Urban1 056 1052 0121.06 [0.97 , 1.17]1.02 [0.92 , 1.13]
    Exposure by trimester: b
        None1 211 3851 7781.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
        First330 2635271.09 [0.99 , 1.20]1.04 [0.94 , 1.16]
        Second372 1366201.14 [1.04 , 1.25]**1.11 [1.01 , 1.23]*
        Third331 1595491.13 [1.03 , 1.2])*1.17 [1.06 , 1.30]**
Secondary analyses
    Antibiotic class
        None1 211 3851 7781.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
        Penicillin antibiotics494 4068131.12 [1.03 , 1.22]**1.13 [1.04 , 1.24]**
        Other beta lactams132 0142331.19 [1.04 , 1.36]*1.18 [1.03 , 1.37]*
        Macrolides and related antibiotics135 9172221.11 [0.97 , 1.28]1.04 [0.90 , 1.20]
        Others194 8263021.06 [0.94 , 1.20]1.01 [0.98 , 1.15]
    Number of antibiotic courses
        01 211 3851 7781.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
        1458 3787391.10 [1.10 , 1.20]*1.10 [1.00 , 1.20]
        2166 6952661.09 [0.96 , 1.24]1.07 [0.93 , 1.22]
        > = 3107 1541821.16 [1.00 , 1.35]1.16 [0.98 , 1.37]
    Cumulative antibiotic duration (days)
        01 211 3851 7781.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
        1–7300 5544721.07 [0.96 , 1.18]1.07 [0.96 , 1.19]
        8–14237 2333841.11 [0.99 , 1.24]1.10 [0.98 , 1.24]
        >14194 4413311.17 [1.04 , 1.31]*1.15 [1.01 , 1.30]*

P-value:

*P<0.05

**

***P<0.001

a Adjusted for sex, region, SES, maternal age at delivery, maternal medical conditions (mood and anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, DM, prenatal infections) prenatal antidepressants use, size for gestational age, childhood medical conditions (epilepsy, infections, neonatal jaundice, asthma and a diagnosis with other developmental disability disorder), antibiotics use in the first year of life, birth complications, mode of delivery, multiple birth, breastfeeding initiation, year of birth, season of birth, and birth order, health care access

b First trimester = 0 to 13 weeks of pregnancy, second trimester = 14 to 27 weeks, third trimester = 28 weeks until date of birth

Table 3

Association between antibiotic exposure and risk of ASD in the sibling cohort.

VariablePerson-yearsNumber of eventsHR [95% CI]
UnadjustedAdjusted a
Main analysis
    Prenatal antibiotics exposure700 6109771.05 [0.90 ,1.22]1.08 [0.90 , 1.30]
    Stratified by sex:
        Male357 0767861.21 [0.97 , 1.52]1.14 [0.89 , 1.47]
        Female343 5351911.03 [0.64 , 1.64]1.10 [0.57 , 2.11]
    Stratified by region:
        Rural361 4863781.12 [0.87 , 1.45]1.19 [0.85 , 1.67]
        Urban339 1245991.07 [0.88 , 1.30]1.07 [0.84 , 1.37]
    Exposure by trimester: b
        None368 8715011.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
        First141 4961901.15 [0.94 , 1.41]1.25 [1.00 , 1.58]
        Second159 4182491.13 [0.94 , 1.36]1.16 [0.94 , 1.44]
        Third143 0392071.21 [0.99 , 1.47]1.25 [1.00 , 1.57]
Secondary analyses
    Antibiotic class
        None368 8715011.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
        Penicillin219 4363271.11 [0.94 , 1.32]1.18 [0.97 , 1.45]
        Macrolides and related antibiotics59 611931.27 [0.96 , 1.68]1.24 [0.91 , 1.68]
        Other Beta lactams57 224821.27 [0.95 , 1.71]1.29 [0.94 , 1.77]
        Others80 1091010.96 [0.74 , 1.26]1.01 [0.75 , 1.36]
    Number of antibiotic courses
    0368 8715011.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
    1226 3233110.99 [0.83 , 1.18]1.04 [0.85 , 1.28]
    270 2451151.14 [0.86 , 1.51]1.17 [0.84 , 1.62]
    > = 335 171501.33 [0.87 , 2.03]1.20 [0.73 , 1.96]
    Cumulative antibiotic duration [days]
        0368 8715011.00 [Reference]1.00 [Reference]
        1–7148 8162000.97 [0.78 , 1.19]1.04 [0.81 , 1.32]
        8–14111 4091651.03 [0.82 , 1.30]1.06 [0.81 , 1.38]
        >1471 5141111.29 [0.96 , 1.72]1.26 [0.89 , 1.79]

a Adjusted for sex, region, SES, maternal age at delivery, prenatal infections, prenatal antidepressants use, size for gestational age, childhood medical conditions [epilepsy, infections, neonatal jaundice, asthma and a diagnosis with other developmental disability disorder], antibiotics use in the first year of life, birth complications, mode of delivery, multiple birth, breastfeeding initiation, year of birth, season of birth, and birth order.

b First trimester = 0 to 13 weeks of pregnancy, second = 13 to 27 weeks, third = 28 weeks until date of birth

P-value: *P<0.05 ** ***P<0.001 a Adjusted for sex, region, SES, maternal age at delivery, maternal medical conditions (mood and anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, DM, prenatal infections) prenatal antidepressants use, size for gestational age, childhood medical conditions (epilepsy, infections, neonatal jaundice, asthma and a diagnosis with other developmental disability disorder), antibiotics use in the first year of life, birth complications, mode of delivery, multiple birth, breastfeeding initiation, year of birth, season of birth, and birth order, health care access b First trimester = 0 to 13 weeks of pregnancy, second trimester = 14 to 27 weeks, third trimester = 28 weeks until date of birth a Adjusted for sex, region, SES, maternal age at delivery, prenatal infections, prenatal antidepressants use, size for gestational age, childhood medical conditions [epilepsy, infections, neonatal jaundice, asthma and a diagnosis with other developmental disability disorder], antibiotics use in the first year of life, birth complications, mode of delivery, multiple birth, breastfeeding initiation, year of birth, season of birth, and birth order. b First trimester = 0 to 13 weeks of pregnancy, second = 13 to 27 weeks, third = 28 weeks until date of birth

Sensitivity analyses

The association between prenatal antibiotic exposure and ASD was consistent across the different sensitivity analyses (Fig 2). The risk ranged from HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.91, 1.19] when restricting the cohort to those who had an infection diagnostic code during pregnancy to HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.02, 1.20] when including inpatient antibiotic use. Maternal antibiotic exposure in the year before pregnancy and the year after birth were not found to be associated with ASD risk in the child (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.91, 1.06] and 1.03 [95% CI 0.94, 1.12], respectively).
Fig 2

Forest plot with sensitivity analyses risk estimates.

Discussion

Findings from this large population-based cohort study showed a 10% increase in the risk of ASD in children exposed to antibiotics prenatally compared to those who were not exposed. This association was dependent on region and was only observed in those residing in rural regions. The increased risk was shown in those exposed to penicillins and other beta lactams and in those exposed to antibiotics in the second or third trimester. The highest risk was observed in those exposed to antibiotics for longer than two weeks or who received 3 or more antibiotic courses. The lack of association in the two negative controls provides confidence that the findings are reliable. Since the main model could not account for all confounding sources, we explored the association using a sibling cohort design to address environmental, genetic and other familial or social factors. In the analysis of the sibling cohort, the risk of ASD with prenatal antibiotic exposure did not change significantly, except the association was no longer statistically significant. This could be explained by the smaller sample size of the sibling cohort. This led us to conclude that prenatal antibiotic exposure appears to be associated with a small increase in ASD risk. Nevertheless, we believe the observed risk is too small to be clinically meaningful and may have been influenced by residual confounding from variables that could not be identified in the Repository, not shared by sibling pairs or not recorded correctly. Study findings are consistent with a previous exploratory population-based cohort study conducted by Atladóttir HO et al in Denmark [29]. The study investigated the association of self-reported maternal infections, febrile episodes and prenatal antibiotics use with the risk for ASD. There was no association of maternal infection or febrile episodes with the risk for ASD. However, there was an increased risk of ASD with prenatal use of antibiotics (HR 1.20 [95% CI 1.00, 1.40]). Due to the exploratory nature of this study, and the potential misclassification of the self-reported exposure data, the findings needed to be replicated in a large study designed to address this research question using reliable exposure data sources. Even though the study by Atladóttir HO et al. did not find an association between prenatal infection and ASD risk, other studies reported increased ASD risk with multiple prenatal infections or infections requiring hospitalization [30, 31]. Accordingly, confounding by indication is a concern and may have influenced the findings of the current study. Our study has several strengths including the large sample size, long follow-up period, the use of administrative databases to identify the exposure and the outcome, including many potential confounders and the sibling-controlled design that minimized confounding by unmeasured familial factors. Despite the mentioned strengths, few limitations need to be considered. Exposure misclassification is a concern since drug dispensation does not necessarily indicate drug use. In addition, inpatient antibiotic dispensations were not included in the main analysis due to the limited data years and geographic coverage of the inpatient dispensation database. However, the observed association did not change significantly in the sensitivity analysis that included the subset of data available on inpatient dispensations. Outcome misclassification is another concern given that the utilized ASD identification algorithm has not been independently validated, yet using a stricter ASD identification algorithm did not change the risk estimate. The potential for unmeasured confounding from variables that are not shared by sibling pairs is a potential limitation. For example, we could only identify maternal siblings due to the lack of reliable linked data identifying the fathers. Hence, the sibling cohort included both full and half siblings, which is not ideal to account for confounding by genetic factors. Confounding by indication is another limitation and may have influenced study findings. Future studies are needed to explore other methods to control for confounding in examining similar associations. In addition, studies are recommended to investigate antibiotic-induced microbial dysbiosis and microbiota involvement in neurodevelopmental disorders at the biological level to shed light on the etiology of these disorders and inform disease prevention.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that prenatal antibiotic exposure is associated with a small, albeit clinically non-significant increase in the risk of ASD which may have been influenced by unmeasured confounding.

Description and years of data sources.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Antibiotics classification according to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC).

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Prenatal medications explored as covariates.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Identification algorithm of medical conditions.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Description of antibiotics use.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Characteristics of sibling cohort: Overall and by antibiotics exposure status.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

1.  Differences between the gut microflora of children with autistic spectrum disorders and that of healthy children.

Authors:  Helena Mrt Parracho; Max O Bingham; Glenn R Gibson; Anne L McCartney
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 2.  Prenatal risk factors for autism: comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Gardener; Donna Spiegelman; Stephen L Buka
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 3.  Perinatal and neonatal risk factors for autism: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Gardener; Donna Spiegelman; Stephen L Buka
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism.

Authors:  Joachim Hallmayer; Sue Cleveland; Andrea Torres; Jennifer Phillips; Brianne Cohen; Tiffany Torigoe; Janet Miller; Angie Fedele; Jack Collins; Karen Smith; Linda Lotspeich; Lisa A Croen; Sally Ozonoff; Clara Lajonchere; Judith K Grether; Neil Risch
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-04

5.  Isolation of commensal bacteria from umbilical cord blood of healthy neonates born by cesarean section.

Authors:  Esther Jiménez; Leonides Fernández; María L Marín; Rocío Martín; Juan M Odriozola; Carmen Nueno-Palop; Arjan Narbad; Mónica Olivares; Jordi Xaus; Juan M Rodríguez
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Genetics of autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Daniel H Geschwind
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Real-time PCR quantitation of clostridia in feces of autistic children.

Authors:  Yuli Song; Chengxu Liu; Sydney M Finegold
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Oral antibiotic prescribing during pregnancy in primary care: UK population-based study.

Authors:  Irene Petersen; Ruth Gilbert; Stephen Evans; Antonia Ridolfi; Irwin Nazareth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Antibiotics in pregnancy: analysis of potential risks and determinants in a large German statutory sickness fund population.

Authors:  Ute Amann; Veronika Egen-Lappe; Christine Strunz-Lehner; Joerg Hasford
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Validity of autism diagnoses using administrative health data.

Authors:  L Dodds; A Spencer; S Shea; D Fell; B A Armson; A C Allen; S Bryson
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  2009
View more
  8 in total

1.  Maternal antibiotics disrupt microbiome, behavior, and temperature regulation in unexposed infant mice.

Authors:  Christopher Harshaw; Sayuri Kojima; Cara L Wellman; Gregory E Demas; Ardythe L Morrow; Diana Hazard Taft; William M Kenkel; Joseph K Leffel; Jeffrey R Alberts
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.531

2.  Antibiotic Treatment during Pregnancy Alters Offspring Gut Microbiota in a Sex-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Abdullah M Madany; Heather K Hughes; Paul Ashwood
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-30

3.  Impacts of ceftriaxone exposure during pregnancy on maternal gut and placental microbiota and its influence on maternal and offspring immunity in mice.

Authors:  Ruyue Cheng; Jiawen Guo; Yujie Zhang; Guo Cheng; Wei Qian; ChaoMin Wan; Ming Li; Francesco Marotta; Xi Shen; Fang He
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2020-12-03

4.  Prenatal Drug Exposure in Children With a History of Neuropsychiatric Care: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Justine Benevent; Caroline Hurault-Delarue; Mélanie Araujo; Alexis Revet; Agnès Sommet; Isabelle Lacroix; Christine Damase-Michel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 5.  The Promising Role of Probiotics in Managing the Altered Gut in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Basma Abdellatif; Clare McVeigh; Ghizlane Bendriss; Ali Chaari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The Association between Autism Spectrum Disorder and Pre- and Postnatal Antibiotic Exposure in Childhood-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eunmi Lee; Jeonghyun Cho; Ka Young Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Mitochondria May Mediate Prenatal Environmental Influences in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Richard E Frye; Janet Cakir; Shannon Rose; Raymond F Palmer; Christine Austin; Paul Curtin; Manish Arora
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  The maternal microbiome modulates fetal neurodevelopment in mice.

Authors:  Helen E Vuong; Geoffrey N Pronovost; Drake W Williams; Elena J L Coley; Emily L Siegler; Austin Qiu; Maria Kazantsev; Chantel J Wilson; Tomiko Rendon; Elaine Y Hsiao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 69.504

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.