Literature DB >> 31465200

Nanostructured Materials for Intracellular Cargo Delivery.

Andy Tay1,2, Nicholas Melosh1.   

Abstract

Intracellular cargo delivery is an essential step in many biomedical applications including gene editing and biologics therapy. Examples of cargo include nucleic acids (RNA and DNA), proteins, small biomolecules, and drugs, which can vary substantially in terms of their sizes, charges, solubility, and stability. Viruses have been used traditionally to deliver nucleic acids into cells, but the method suffers from limitations such as small cargo size, safety concerns, and viral genome integration into host cells, all of which complicate therapeutic applications. Commercially available techniques using biochemicals and bulk electroporation are, in general, poorly compatible with primary cells such as human induced pluripotent stem cells and immune cells, which are increasingly important candidates for adoptive cell therapy. Nanostructures, with dimensions ranging from tens of nanometers to a few micrometers, may play a critical role in overcoming cellular manipulation and delivery challenges and provide a powerful alternative to conventional techniques. A critical feature that differentiates nanostructures from viral, biochemical, and bulk electroporation techniques is that they interface with cells at a scale measuring ten to hundreds of nanometers in size. This highly local interaction enables application of stronger and more direct stimuli such as mechanical force, heat, or electric fields than would be possible in a bulk treatment. Compared to popular viral, biochemical, and bulk electroporation methods, nanostructures were found to minimally perturb cells with cells remaining in good health during postdelivery culture. These advantages have enabled nanostructures such as nanowires and nanotubes to successfully interface with a wide variety of cells, including primary immune cells and cardiomyocytes, for in vitro and in vivo applications. This Account is focused on using nanostructures for cargo delivery into biological cells. In this Account, we will first outline the historical developments using nanostructures for interfacing with cells. We will highlight how mechanistic understanding of nano-bio interactions has evolved over the last decade and how this improved knowledge has motivated coupling of electric and magnetic fields to nanostructures to improve delivery outcomes. There will also be an in-depth discussion on the merits of nanostructures in comparison to conventional methods using viruses, biochemicals, and bulk electroporation. Finally, motivated by our observations on the lack of consistency in reporting key metrics such as efficiency in literature, we suggest a set of metrics for documenting experimental results with the aim to promote standardization in reporting and ease in comparing. We suggest the use of more sophisticated tools such as RNA transcriptomics for thorough assessment of cell perturbation attributed to intracellular delivery. We hope that this Account can effectively capture the progress of nanostructure-mediated cargo delivery and encourage new innovations.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31465200     DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  17 in total

Review 1.  Tutorial: using nanoneedles for intracellular delivery.

Authors:  Ciro Chiappini; Yaping Chen; Stella Aslanoglou; Anna Mariano; Valentina Mollo; Huanwen Mu; Enrica De Rosa; Gen He; Ennio Tasciotti; Xi Xie; Francesca Santoro; Wenting Zhao; Nicolas H Voelcker; Roey Elnathan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 17.021

2.  Mechanical Stimulation after Centrifuge-Free Nano-Electroporative Transfection Is Efficient and Maintains Long-Term T Cell Functionalities.

Authors:  Andy Tay; Nicholas Melosh
Journal:  Small       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 3.  Tumorigenicity risk of iPSCs in vivo: nip it in the bud.

Authors:  Chaoliang Zhong; Miao Liu; Xinghua Pan; Haiying Zhu
Journal:  Precis Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-03

Review 4.  Semi-Implantable Bioelectronics.

Authors:  Jiaru Fang; Shuang Huang; Fanmao Liu; Gen He; Xiangling Li; Xinshuo Huang; Hui-Jiuan Chen; Xi Xie
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2022-05-28

Review 5.  CRISPR-Cas9-Based Technology and Its Relevance to Gene Editing in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Mujeeb Ur Rahman; Muhammad Bilal; Junaid Ali Shah; Ajeet Kaushik; Pierre-Louis Teissedre; Małgorzata Kujawska
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 6.  Fabrication and use of silicon hollow-needle arrays to achieve tissue nanotransfection in mouse tissue in vivo.

Authors:  Yi Xuan; Subhadip Ghatak; Andrew Clark; Zhigang Li; Savita Khanna; Dongmin Pak; Mangilal Agarwal; Sashwati Roy; Peter Duda; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 7.  Cell-based carrier for targeted hitchhiking delivery.

Authors:  Tonggong Liu; Cheng Gao; Dayong Gu; Huanwen Tang
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.671

Review 8.  High Throughput and Highly Controllable Methods for In Vitro Intracellular Delivery.

Authors:  Justin Brooks; Grayson Minnick; Prithvijit Mukherjee; Arian Jaberi; Lingqian Chang; Horacio D Espinosa; Ruiguo Yang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Rational Design and Fabrication of ZnONPs Functionalized Sericin/PVA Antimicrobial Sponge.

Authors:  Lisha Ai; Huawei He; Peng Wang; Rui Cai; Gang Tao; Meirong Yang; Liying Liu; Hua Zuo; Ping Zhao; Yejing Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  A review of emerging physical transfection methods for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing.

Authors:  Apresio K Fajrial; Qing Qing He; Nurul I Wirusanti; Jill E Slansky; Xiaoyun Ding
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.