Deepshikha Charan Ashana1,2,3, Craig A Umscheid4, Alisa J Stephens-Shields5, Rachel Kohn1,2,3, Vanessa Madden1, Michael O Harhay1,5, Yong Chen5, Meeta Prasad Kerlin1,2,3. 1. Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: As ICUs are increasingly a site of end-of-life care, many have adopted end-of-life care resources. We sought to determine the association of such resources with outcomes of ICU patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Pennsylvania ICUs. PATIENTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. INTERVENTIONS: Availability of any of one hospital-based resource (palliative care consultants) or four ICU-based resources (protocol for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, triggers for automated palliative care consultation, protocol for family meetings, and palliative care clinicians embedded in ICU rounds). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In mixed-effects regression analyses, admission to a hospital with end-of-life resources was not associated with mortality, length of stay, or treatment intensity (mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, artificial nutrition, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation); however, it was associated with a higher likelihood of discharge to hospice (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.11-2.24), an effect that was driven by ICU-based resources (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04-1.81) rather than hospital-based resources (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.83-1.71). Instrumental variable analysis using differential distance (defined as the additional travel distance beyond the hospital closest to a patient's home needed to reach a hospital with end-of-life resources) demonstrated that among those for whom differential distance would influence receipt of end-of-life resources, admission to a hospital with such resources was not associated with any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: ICU-based end-of-life care resources do not appear to change mortality but are associated with increased hospice utilization. Given that this finding was not confirmed by the instrumental variable analysis, future studies should attempt to verify this finding, and identify specific resources or processes of care that impact the care of ICU patients at the end of life.
OBJECTIVES: As ICUs are increasingly a site of end-of-life care, many have adopted end-of-life care resources. We sought to determine the association of such resources with outcomes of ICU patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING:Pennsylvania ICUs. PATIENTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. INTERVENTIONS: Availability of any of one hospital-based resource (palliative care consultants) or four ICU-based resources (protocol for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, triggers for automated palliative care consultation, protocol for family meetings, and palliative care clinicians embedded in ICU rounds). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In mixed-effects regression analyses, admission to a hospital with end-of-life resources was not associated with mortality, length of stay, or treatment intensity (mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, artificial nutrition, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation); however, it was associated with a higher likelihood of discharge to hospice (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.11-2.24), an effect that was driven by ICU-based resources (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04-1.81) rather than hospital-based resources (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.83-1.71). Instrumental variable analysis using differential distance (defined as the additional travel distance beyond the hospital closest to a patient's home needed to reach a hospital with end-of-life resources) demonstrated that among those for whom differential distance would influence receipt of end-of-life resources, admission to a hospital with such resources was not associated with any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: ICU-based end-of-life care resources do not appear to change mortality but are associated with increased hospice utilization. Given that this finding was not confirmed by the instrumental variable analysis, future studies should attempt to verify this finding, and identify specific resources or processes of care that impact the care of ICU patients at the end of life.
Authors: M Elizabeth Wilcox; Christopher A K Y Chong; Daniel J Niven; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Kathryn M Rowan; Hannah Wunsch; Eddy Fan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Joan M Teno; Pedro Gozalo; Amal N Trivedi; Jennifer Bunker; Julie Lima; Jessica Ogarek; Vincent Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thomas S Valley; Michael W Sjoding; Andrew M Ryan; Theodore J Iwashyna; Colin R Cooke Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Sep 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Patsy D Treece; Lois Downey; Danae Dotolo; Sarah E Shannon; Anthony L Back; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alexi A Wright; Nancy L Keating; Tracy A Balboni; Ursula A Matulonis; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Ian C Lee; Sylvia Kuo; Carol Spence; Stephen R Connor; David J Casarett Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andreas García-Bardon; Jens Kamuf; Alexander Ziebart; Tanghua Liu; Nadia Krebs; Bastian Dünges; Robert F Kelm; Svenja Morsbach; Kristin Mohr; Axel Heimann; Erik K Hartmann; Serge C Thal Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Christopher E Cox; Deepshikha Charan Ashana; Krista L Haines; David Casarett; Maren K Olsen; Alice Parish; Yasmin Ali O'Keefe; Mashael Al-Hegelan; Robert W Harrison; Colleen Naglee; Jason N Katz; Allie Frear; Elias H Pratt; Jessie Gu; Isaretta L Riley; Shirley Otis-Green; Kimberly S Johnson; Sharron L Docherty Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-01-04