Literature DB >> 31464063

Short-term fully closed-loop insulin delivery using faster insulin aspart compared with standard insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes.

Lia Bally1, David Herzig1, Yue Ruan2,3, Malgorzata E Wilinska2, Mariam Semmo4, Andreas Vogt5, Maria M Wertli6, Bruno Vogt4, Christoph Stettler1, Roman Hovorka2,7.   

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of short-term fully closed-loop insulin delivery using faster versus standard insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes. Fifteen adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes underwent 22 hours of closed-loop insulin delivery with either faster or standard insulin aspart in a double-blind randomized crossover design. Basal-bolus regimen was replaced by model predictive control algorithm-directed insulin delivery based on sensor glucose levels. The primary outcome was time with plasma glucose in target range (5.6-10.0 mmol/L) and did not differ between treatments (mean difference [95% CI] 3.3% [-8.2; 1.7], P = 0.17). Mean glucose and glucose variability were comparable, as was time spent below and above target range. Hypoglycaemia (<3.5 mmol/L) occurred once with faster insulin aspart and twice with standard insulin aspart. Mean total insulin dose was higher with faster insulin aspart (mean difference [95% CI] 3.7 U [0.7; 6.8], P = 0.021). No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia or other serious adverse events occurred. In conclusion, short-term fully closed-loop in type 2 diabetes may require higher dose of faster insulin aspart compared with standard insulin aspart to achieve comparable glucose control.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antidiabetic drug; artificial pancreas; closed-loop system; insulin analogues; insulin pump therapy; randomized trial; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2019        PMID: 31464063     DOI: 10.1111/dom.13861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  3 in total

Review 1.  [What is the current state of the artificial pancreas in diabetes care?]

Authors:  M Dimou; M Laimer; C Stettler; L Bally
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  The continuing quest for better subcutaneously administered prandial insulins: a review of recent developments and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  David R Owens; Geremia B Bolli
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 3.  Automated insulin delivery: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A Consensus Report of the Joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Jennifer L Sherr; Lutz Heinemann; G Alexander Fleming; Richard M Bergenstal; Daniela Bruttomesso; Hélène Hanaire; Reinhard W Holl; John R Petrie; Anne L Peters; Mark Evans
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 10.460

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.